UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON,

Washington, D.C. 20549

SCHEDULE 14A

(RULE 14A-101)

Rule

14a-101)
INFORMATION REQUIRED IN PROXY STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION
SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION
Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) OF THE

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OFof the

Securities Exchange Act of 1934

Filed by the Registrant  x                            Filed by a Partyparty other than the Registrant  ¨

Check the appropriate box:

¨Preliminary Proxy Statement
¨
Confidential, Forfor Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule
14a-6(e)(2))
xDefinitive Proxy Statement
¨Definitive Additional Materials
¨
Soliciting Material Pursuant to Rule 14a-12
§240.14a-12

MEDICAL PROPERTIES TRUST, INC.

(Name of Registrant as Specified in Itsits Charter)

Not Applicable

applicable.

(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if Other Thanother than the Registrant)

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box)all boxes that apply):

x No fee required.
¨Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11.
(1)

Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:

(2)

Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:

(3)

Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):

(4)

Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:

(5)

Total fee paid:

¨ Fee paid previously with preliminary materials:materials.
¨ Check box if any part of the fee is offset as providedFee computed on table in exhibit required by Item 25(b) per Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) Rules
14a-6(i)(1)
and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.
0-11.


LOGO



LOGO

April 27, 2023

Dear Fellow Stockholder:

While 2022 was in some ways a challenging year, MPT’s fundamentals remained strong as the Company continued to execute its business plan to grow earnings and reallocate capital. We closed over $1 billion in new investments in 2022 and grew net income and Normalized Funds from Operations (“Normalized FFO”) by an average of 34% and 25%, respectively, since the beginning of 2020. Our 2022 Return on Equity (“ROE”) based on net income was 10.59%, and our ROE based on Normalized FFO was 11.25%.

Our commitment to strong corporate and social responsibility continues to evolve and improve. We recently published our second Corporate Responsibility Report highlighting our Environmental, Social, and Governance (“ESG”) program and initiatives. We are dedicated to reducing the environmental impact of our operations, to being socially responsible to the communities in which we operate and to fostering an inclusive culture that allows all our employees to develop. I am also very proud that MPT was recognized by Modern Healthcare as one of the best places to work.

We entered 2023 in a very strong financial position, well poised to rapidly capitalize on value-generative opportunities that are aligned with our proven strategy. We remain committed to hospitals that are critical to their local healthcare ecosystem. As the healthcare landscape changes, our hospitals will remain at the very heart of healthcare, and we will be there to support them and the communities in which they operate.

 (1)LOGO 

Amount previously paid:

(2)

Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:

(3)

Filing party:

(4)

Date filed:


LOGO

MPT
Medical Properties Trust
2016 Proxy Statement
At the Very Heart of Healthcare


LOGO


LOGO

MPT
Letter from Our Chairman
April 29, 2016
Dear Fellow Shareholder:
I am honored to have you as one of our shareholders and thank you for the trust you have placed in us by purchasing shares in our company. We take your trust seriously.
We also value your thoughts and ideas. In addition to seeking your input via your vote, we regularly seek your views, either by contacting you directly or by making it easy for you to reach me or any of my fellow directors individually. These conversations contribute to the continuous improvement we describe in this Proxy Statement.
We are providing you this proxy and Proxy Statement to enable you to give us your input by voting. We hope that you will attend our 20162023 annual shareholders meeting of stockholders, to be held on May 19, 2016.25, 2023. Details of the business to be conducted at the meeting are set forth in the accompanying Proxy Statement. In the event that you are unable to attend, however, we urge you to vote by mail, phone, or Internet, as described in the following material.
I want to call your attention especially to the compensation provisions highlighted in our Compensation Discussion and Analysis: our plans both align pay with shareholder returns and include provisions that tie executives’ pay to numeric performance hurdles. We believe our plans have produced conservative results with excellent internal and external pay parity. I hope you agree.
As a company whose founders are still on the job, we rely on much more than compensation and solid governance to drive performance — our reputations drive us too.
We work hard to keep your trust. We thank

Thank you for your investment and we encourage your input.
continued support of our company.

Best Regards,

LOGO

Edward K. Aldag, Jr.

Chairman, President, and Chief Executive Officer
Proxy Statement and Notice of 2016 Annual Meeting
i


LOGO

Notice of 2016 Annual Meeting of Shareholders

Proxy Statement and Notice of 2023 Annual Meeting    i 


LOGO

April 29, 2016
Meeting Information
Date and Time:
May 19, 2016
10:30 a.m. Central Time
Location:
The Summit Club
1901 6th Avenue North
Birmingham, Alabama
Agenda
To elect the seven director nominees described in the enclosed Proxy Statement;
To ratify the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the year ending December 31, 2016;
To hold an advisory vote to approve executive officer compensation; and
To transact any other business that properly comes before the meeting.
27, 2023

LOGO

Attached you will find a notice of annual meeting and the Proxy Statement, thatwhich contain further information about thesethe items to be voted on at the annual meeting and the annual meeting itself, including the different methods you can use to vote your proxy. Also enclosed are your proxy card, our 20152022 Annual Report on Form 10-K, and our 20152022 Annual Report to Shareholders.stockholders. Only shareholdersstockholders of record at the close of business on March 21, 2016,29, 2023 are entitled to receive notice of, to attend, and to vote at the annual meeting and any adjournment thereof.

EVEN IF YOU PLAN TO ATTEND IN PERSON, YOU ARE REQUESTED TO SIGN, DATE, AND RETURN THE ENCLOSED PROXY IN THE ACCOMPANYING POSTAGE-PAID ENVELOPE, OR VOTE YOUR PROXY BY TELEPHONE OR INTERNET, AT YOUR EARLIEST CONVENIENCE. This will not prevent you from voting your shares in person if you choose to attend the Annual Meeting.
annual meeting.

Any proxy may be revoked at any time prior to its exercise at the Annual Meeting.
annual meeting.

If any of your shares of common stock are held by a broker, bank or other nominee, please follow the instructions you receive from your broker, bank or other nominee to have your shares of common stock voted.
A list of the shareholders entitled to vote at the meeting will be open to examination by any shareholder, for any purpose germane to the meeting, during ordinary business hours, for a period of at least ten days prior to the meeting at the principal executive offices of the Company in Birmingham, Alabama.

By Order of the Board of Directors,

LOGO

Emmett E. McLean

Executive Vice President, Chief Operating Officer, Treasurer

and Secretary
ii Medical Properties Trust


LOGO

Information About the Meeting
What

 ii    Proxy Statement and Notice of 2023 Annual Meeting


LOGO

LOGO

How to Vote

Your vote is the purpose of the meeting?
At the meeting, our shareholders willimportant. You may vote on the following proposals:
1. To elect the seven director nominees described in the enclosed Proxy Statement;
2. To ratify the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the year ending December 31, 2016;
3. To hold an advisory vote to approve executive officer compensation; and
4. To transact any other business that properly comes before the meeting.
In addition, our management will report on our performance at the meeting and respond to appropriate questions from shareholders.
Who is entitled to vote?
The record date for the meeting is March 21, 2016. Only shareholders of record at the close of business on March 21, 2016, are entitled to receive notice of the meeting and to vote at the meeting theyour shares of our common stock that they heldif you were a stockholder of record on that date. Each outstanding share of common stock entitles its holder to one vote on each matter voted on at the meeting. At the close of business on March 21, 2016, there were 237,714,694 shares of common stock outstanding and entitled to vote.
Am I entitled to vote if my shares are held in “street name”?
If you are the beneficial owner of shares held in “street name” by a brokerage firm, bank, or other nominee, your nominee is required to vote the shares in accordance with your instructions. If you do not give instructions to your nominee, your nominee will be entitled to vote your shares on routine items, but will not be permitted to do so on non-routine items. Your nominee will have discretion to vote on Proposal 2 (ratification of auditors) without any instructions from you, but your nominee will not have the ability to vote your uninstructed shares on Proposal 1 (election of directors), or Proposal 3 (advisory vote to approve executive officer compensation) on a discretionary basis. Accordingly, if you hold your shares in “street name” and you do not instruct your nominee how to vote on these proposals, your nominee cannot vote these shares and will report them as “broker non-votes,” and no votes will be cast on your behalf.
How many shares must be present to conduct business at the meeting?
A quorum must be present at the meeting in order for any business to be conducted. The presence at the meeting, in person or by proxy, of the holders of a majority of the shares of common stock outstanding on the record date, or 118,857,348 shares, will constitute a quorum. Abstentions and broker non-votes will be included in the number of shares considered present at the meeting for the purpose of determining whether there is a quorum.
Proxy Statement and Notice of 2016 Annual Meeting
iii


LOGO

Information About the Meeting
What happens if a quorum is not present at the meeting?
If a quorum is not present at the scheduled time of the meeting, the holders of a majority of the shares present in person or represented by proxy at the meeting may adjourn the meeting to another place, date, or time until a quorum is present. The place, date, and time of the adjourned meeting will be announced when the adjournment is taken, and no other notice will be given unless the adjournment is to a date more than 120 days after the original record date or if, after the adjournment, a new record date is fixed for the adjourned meeting.
How do I vote my shares?
Voting by telephone or Internet. If you are a beneficial owner of shares held in “street name,” meaning your shares are held in the name of a brokerage firm, bank, or other nominee, you may be eligible to provide voting instructions to your nominee by telephone or on the Internet. A large number of brokerage firms, banks, and other nominees participate in a program provided through Broadridge Financial Solutions that offers telephone and Internet voting options. If your shares are held in “street name” by a brokerage firm, bank, or other nominee that participates in the Broadridge program, you may provide voting instructions to your nominee by telephone or on the Internet by following the instructions set forth on the voting instruction form provided to you.
Voting by mail.29, 2023. If you are a registered shareholder, meaning you hold your shares in your own name,owner you may vote by properly completing, signing, dating, and returning the accompanying proxy card. The enclosed postage-paid envelope requires no additional postage if it is mailed in the United States or Canada. If you are a beneficial owner of shares held in “street name,” you may provide voting instructions to the brokerage firm, bank, or other nominee that holds your shares by properly completing, signing, dating, and returning the voting instruction form provided to you by your nominee.
Voting in person at the meeting. If you are a registered shareholder and attend the meeting, you may deliver your completed proxy card in person. In addition, we will make written ballots available to registered shareholders who wish to vote in person at the meeting. If you are a beneficial owner of shares held in “street name” and wish to vote at the meeting, you will need to obtain a proxy form from the brokerage firm, bank, or other nominee that holds your shares that authorizes you to vote those shares.
Can I change my vote after I submit my proxy?
Yes, you may revoke your proxy and change your vote at any time before the polls are closed at the meeting inusing any of the following ways: (1) by properly completing, signing, dating,methods:

By Internet

 www.voteproxy.com

By Telephone

 1-800-PROXIES

 (1-800-776-9437)

By Mail

 Complete, sign, date, and returning anotherreturn your enclosed proxy card withcard.

In Person

 At the Annual Meeting

If you own your shares through a later date; (2) if you are a registered shareholder, by voting in person at the meeting; (3) if you are a registered shareholder, by giving written notice of such revocation to our Secretary prior to or at the meeting; or (4) if you are a beneficial owner of shares held in “street name,” by following the instructions given by the brokerage firm, bank, broker or other nominee, that holdsyou should follow the voting instructions provided by your shares. Your attendance at the meeting will not by itself revoke your proxy.
ivbank, broker or other nominee.

Proxy Statement and Notice of 2023 Annual Meeting    iii 


Proxy Summary

Performance Highlights

During 2022, Medical Properties Trust


LOGO

Information About (“MPT,” the Meeting
What happens if I do not specify on my proxy how my shares“Company” or “we”) continued to execute its business plan to grow earnings and reallocate capital despite challenging market conditions. We are the first U.S. company of its kind to be voted?
If you areinvest in hospitals globally, and we have established ourselves as a registered shareholder and submit a properly executed proxy but do not indicate any voting instructions, the proxy holders will voteglobal leader in hospital real estate finance as the Boardsecond largest non-governmental owner of Directors recommendshospitals in the world. The steady execution of our strategy and business plan continues to deliver strong financial results and long-term value creation.

Proven Execution of MPT Strategy

Value-Added Transactions  Consistent Earnings Growth
over the past three years
  Transformative Growth

$1.1 Billion

New Investments closed in 2022

 

  

34%

 

25%

 

  

26.9%

 

$13 Billion in New Investments closed

since the beginning of 2019

  

 

Net Income Compound

Annual Growth Rate

(“CAGR”) since the

beginning of 2020

 

Normalized Funds from

Operations CAGR

since the beginning of

2020(1)

  

 

Fully Funded Investment

CAGR since IPO

    

     
Continuous Tenant Diversification   Sustainable Future
         LOGO      LOGO   

17.6 Years

 

 

Weighted-Average

Lease and Loan Maturity

Stockholder Value Creation(2)

MPT has generated meaningful value for our stockholders
over the long-term

$4.32B

Dividends Paid

since our IPO

10

Consecutive Years of Annual

Dividend Increases

Total Stockholder Returns (“TSR”)(2)(4)

+288%

Outperforming the Health

Care Index by +60%

Since-IPO

+77%

Outperforming the Health

Care Index by +45%

Ten-Year

+10%

Outperforming the Health

Care Index by +3%

Five-Year

(1)

Refer to Appendix A for our definition of FFO and Normalized FFO and a reconciliation of net income to FFO and Normalized FFO.

(2)

As of December 31, 2022.

(3)

Our largest tenant concentration was 19.8% as of December 31, 2022 on a total adjusted gross asset basis. Refer to Appendix A for our definition of total adjusted gross assets and a reconciliation of total assets to total adjusted gross assets.

(4)

Healthcare Index represents the Dow Jones Real Estate Healthcare Index.

 iv    Proxy Statement and Notice of 2023 Annual Meeting


Proxy Summary

Executive Compensation Highlights

Pay-for-Performance

Our executive compensation program is designed to drive and reward performance over the long term and on each proposal.
Will any other business be conducted atan annual basis. The foundational principle of our program is to motivate our executives to achieve the meeting?
Asstrategies, operational and financial goals, that are designed by our Compensation Committee to create significant value for our stockholders. Executive compensation is directly affected by the level of achievement of these pre-established goals. The effectiveness of our executive compensation program is illustrated by the date hereof,following:

Consistent long-term growth in earnings as illustrated by our consistent growth in Normalized FFO(1) over the past several years

Even though our executives achieved important operational and financial goals, significant portions of their 2022 compensation were reduced because the Company’s TSR did not meet the goals set out by the Compensation Committee

The value to our executives of the equity awards granted as part of their compensation in 2022 was reduced based on the decrease in the market price of our shares, directly aligning our executives with our stockholders.

We believe that our executive compensation program represents a balanced, pay-for-performance approach with only 6% of our CEO’s compensation fixed in the Boardform of Directors knows of no business that will be presented atbase salary and the meeting other than the proposals described in this Proxy Statement. However, if any other proposal properly comes before the shareholders for a vote at the meeting, the proxy holders will vote the shares represented by your proxy in accordance with their best judgment.
How many votes are required for action to be taken on each proposal?
The seven director nominees will be elected to serve on the Board of Directors if they each receive a majority of the votes cast in person or represented by proxy at the meeting. This means that a director nominee will be elected only if the votes cast “for” his or her election exceed the votes cast “against” his or her election. The Board of Directors has adopted a director resignation policy whereby any director who fails to receive the required majority vote in an uncontested election is required to promptly tender his or her resignationour equity awards (66% for our CEO) tied to the Board for its consideration. Theachievement of operational goals and subject to adjustment based on absolute and relative TSR performance.

(1)

Refer to Appendix A for our definition of FFO and Normalized FFO and a reconciliation of net income to FFO and Normalized FFO.

Key Compensation Practices

In addition to our strong commitment to pay-for-performance, our compensation program and practices also include the following key features:

LOGO

Alignment with our business plan, which is built on accretive transactions and strong balance sheet management

LOGO

Majority of executive compensation tied to the achievement of rigorous performance goals

LOGO

Majority of equity compensation is performance-based

LOGO

No new employment agreements since 2003 with evergreen provisions, single-trigger change of control provisions or excise tax gross-up provisions

LOGO

Appropriate balance between short-term and long-term incentive measures

LOGO

Transparency with our stockholders on our compensation program, decisions, and practices

LOGO

Meaningful stockholder engagement and response to feedback

LOGO

Anti-hedging and anti-pledging policies

LOGO

Robust clawback policy that allows our Board of Directors (the “Board”) to recover cash and equity incentive compensation in the event of a financial restatement

LOGO

Significant share ownership requirements, including 6x base salary for the CEO and 4x base salary for other named executive officers (“NEOs”)

LOGO

Engagement of an independent compensation consultant to advise the Compensation Committee of the Board on executive compensation matters

Strong Stockholder Support for our Executive Compensation Program

Our 2022 Say-on-Pay vote received over 92% support from our stockholders, which is consistent with our historical support, which has been above 90% since 2016. Our average Say-on-Pay vote results over the past seven years is nearly 95% as compared to approximately 91% in the overall Real Estate Investment Trust (“REIT”) industry.

Our historical Say-on-Pay vote results affirm our stockholders’ consistent support for our Company’s executive compensation program. Over the past three years, we have engaged with stockholders representing a majority of our shares outstanding and, based on the feedback we received and our strong Say-on-Pay support in 2022, we maintained the core elements of our compensation program and made certain enhancements to reinforce our pay-for-performance alignment. We

LOGO
continue to monitor and review our compensation program, engage with our stockholders, and make modifications as appropriate to maintain a best-in-class compensation program.

Proxy Statement and Notice of 2023 Annual Meeting    v 


Proxy Summary

Corporate Governance Highlights

Director Qualifications, Skills, and Experience

Our Ethics, Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will then recommendhas determined that each of our director nominees possesses the qualifications, skills, and experience to effectively oversee the Company’s long-term business strategy.

In addition to the fullcore competencies noted above, our Board believes that the Company will be best served by directors with a wide array of talents and perspectives to drive innovation, promote critical thinking and enhance discussion. Each of the following additional qualifications meaningfully adds to our Board’s depth. The matrix below indicates the percentage of our director nominees who possess each qualification, skill, or experience.

 LOGO LOGO LOGO LOGO LOGO LOGO LOGO LOGO LOGO LOGO

Director Qualifications and Experience

 Strategic
Planning
 Executive
Leadership
 Risk
Management
 REIT / Real
Estate
 Health Care
Industry
 Finance &
Accounting
 Investment Legal /
Regulatory
 Cyber ESG

Percentage of Directors

 100% 78% 100% 100% 67% 67% 78% 56% 33% 33%

Board Composition

We have taken meaningful steps to refresh our Board and the Board will decide, whetherhave sought to accept or reject the resignation offer or take other action. The Boardcreate an effective mix of Directors will act on the recommendation of the Ethics, Nominatingexperience and diversity.

GenderTenureAge
LOGOLOGOLOGO

Corporate Governance Committee within 90 daysPolicies

We are committed to strong corporate governance, and our Board has adopted robust governance practices and policies, including:

Strong Board Governance

History of and commitment to Board diversity and refreshment

Proxy access

Majority voting for uncontested director elections

Lead independent director

Active and responsive stockholder engagement

Stockholders’ ability to amend Bylaws

Anti-hedging and anti-pledging policies

Executives require prior authorization to purchase or sell our shares

Unclassified Board of Directors

Opted out of the Maryland Unsolicited Takeover Act (“MUTA”)

No stockholder rights plan (“poison pill”)

Regular executive sessions of independent Board members

Mandatory director retirement age

Clawback policy

Established a political contribution policy

Strengthened our corporate policies related to Anti-Corruption and Bribery, Code of Ethics, and Business Conduct

Expanded our Code of Ethics and Business Conduct to include third parties

 vi    Proxy Statement and Notice of 2023 Annual Meeting


Proxy Summary

Corporate Responsibility Highlights

As a global leader among healthcare real estate companies, we recognize the need for strong corporate and social responsibility, and we strive to make a positive difference through our business. Our approach to corporate responsibility includes the following certification of the election results. If you vote to “abstain” with respectprinciples:

LOGO

Environmental Sustainability

Our Company-wide environmental policy confirms the value we place on sustainability.

Joined the National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts’ (“Nareit”) Real Estate Sustainability Council

Became a member of the U.S. Green Building Council (USGBC)

Completed CDP (formerly, the Carbon Disclosure Project) Climate Change Questionnaire

Executed Green Lease Provisions into 8% of our portfolio and incorporated green provisions into our standard lease

Recognized as a Green Lease Leader by the Institute for Market Transformation and the Department of Energy’s Better Buildings Alliance

Began collecting greenhouse gas emissions data from our tenant-operated hospitals

Continued and accelerated the process of collection and benchmarking our corporate emissions

Our corporate office space in London is Building Research Establishment Environmental Assessment Methodology (BREEAM) Excellent certified

Our corporate office space in New York City is WELL Gold certified and is projected to be LEED Gold certified

LOGO

Our People

We are committed to providing a dynamic and supportive workplace for our employees that encourages both personal and professional growth through significant training and continuing education opportunities.

As of April 2023, 42% of all MPT employees are female and 44% of all MPT employees report to a female manager or director

Strengthened our Company-wide policies related to human rights, and health and safety

Provided training for our employees, including anti-harassment, cybersecurity, and data security awareness

Recognized as one of Modern Healthcare’s Best Places to Work for the second year in a row

LOGO

Social Responsibility

Given our long-term focus and ownership of our properties, we believe that it is of critical importance to improve the communities in which we operate by providing financial and volunteer support for private and public non-profit programs aimed at improving communities and public health.

Joined Nareit’s Social Responsibility Council

Created a Charity and Community Support Committee through which we support health, social, educational and community organizations

Contributed to over 200 different nonprofit and community-based organizations in 2022

For additional information, please refer to the electionCorporate Responsibility section of one or more director nominees, your shares will not be voted with respect to the person or persons indicated, although they will be counted for the purpose of determining whether there is a quorum at the meeting.
The affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the shares of common stock represented in person or by proxy at the annual meeting and entitled to vote on the proposal is required for approval of each of Proposals 2 and 3.
How will abstentions and broker non-votes be treated?
Abstentions and broker non-votes will not be counted as votes for or against any proposal, and will not be included in calculating the number of votes necessary for approval of the proposal. In all cases, abstentions and broker non-votes will be considered present for the purpose of determining the presence of a quorum.
this Proxy Statement on page 16 and Notice of 2016 Annual Meeting v

the information provided on our website: https://medicalpropertiestrust.com/corporate-responsibility/


LOGOFor more information on our sustainability, please review our Corporate Responsibility Report (“CRR”), which can be found on our website: https://www.medicalpropertiestrust.com/corporate-responsibility

Information About the Meeting
How will proxies be solicited?
The costs of soliciting proxies from our shareholders will be borne by the Company. We will solicit proxies on behalf of the Board of Directors by mail, telephone, facsimile, or other electronic means or in person. Certain of our directors, officers and other employees, without additional compensation, may participate in the solicitation of proxies. We will supply copies of the proxy solicitation materials to brokerage firms, banks, and other nominees for the purpose of soliciting proxies from the beneficial owners of the shares of common stock held of record by such nominees. We will request that such brokerage firms, banks, and other nominees forward the proxy solicitation materials to the beneficial owners and reimburse them for their reasonable expenses. In addition, we anticipate using MacKenzie Partners, Inc., 105 Madison Avenue, New York, NY 10016 as a solicitor at an initial anticipated cost of $7,500.
How can I obtain additional copies of the proxy materials?
If you wish to request extra copies of our Form 10-K, Annual Report or* Throughout this Proxy Statement, free of charge, please send your requestwe include several references to Medical Properties Trust, Inc., 1000 Urban Center Drive, Suite 501, Birmingham, Alabama 35242, or visit our website at www.medicalpropertiestrust.com.
How does the Board of Directors recommend that I voteor materials available on the proposals?
FOR the election of the seven nominees to the Board of Directors;
FOR the ratification of the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the year ending December 31, 2016; and
FOR approval of the compensation ofwebsite. The information available on, or otherwise accessible through, our executive officers as disclosed inwebsite is not incorporated by reference into this Proxy Statement.
vi Medical Properties Trust


LOGO

Table of Contents
01 Proposal 1: Election of Directors
02 Director Nominees
06 Governance Information Regarding Our Board of Directors
11 Proposal 2: Ratification of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
12 Independent Auditor
13 Audit Committee Report
14 Proposal 3: Advisory Vote to Approve Executive Compensation
15 Compensation Discussion and Analysis
28 Executive Compensation
28 Other Aspects of Our Executive Compensation Program
30 Compensation Committee Report
31 Compensation of Executive Officers
33 Summary Compensation Table
34 Grants of Plan-Based Awards
35 Outstanding Equity Awards as of December 31, 2015
36 Option Exercises and Stock Vested
36 Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control
37 Compensation of Directors
39 Share Ownership of Certain Beneficial
40 Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance
41 Certain Relationships and Related Person Transactions
42 Additional Information
Proxy Statement and Notice of 2016 Annual Meeting vii

Proxy Statement and Notice of 2023 Annual Meeting    vii 


LOGOLOGO

Proposal 1: Election of Directors

1Proposal 1: Election of Directors

2Director Nominees

7Governance Information Regarding Our Board of Directors
12Proposal 2: Ratification of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

12Independent Auditor

13Audit Committee Report
14Proposal 3: Advisory Vote to Approve Named Executive Officer Compensation
15 
Proposal 4: Advisory Vote on the Frequency of Future Advisory Votes on
Executive Compensation
16Corporate Responsibility
19Compensation Discussion and Analysis

         34Other Aspects of Our Executive Compensation Program

36Compensation Committee Report
37Summary Compensation Table
38Grants of Plan-Based Awards
39Outstanding Equity Awards as of December 31, 2022
40Option Exercises and Stock Vested
40Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change of Control
41Employment Agreements with Named Executive Officers
43Other Information

43Pay Ratio Disclosure

44Pay Versus Performance

47Compensation of Directors

48Share Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners
50Information About the Meeting
53Certain Relationships and Related Person Transactions
54Additional Information
A-1Appendix A: Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Financial Measures

 viii    Proxy Statement and Notice of 2023 Annual Meeting


LOGO

Our Bylaws provide for the election of all directors at each annual meeting of shareholders.stockholders. The Board, of Directors, at the recommendation of the Ethics, Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, proposes that the sevennine nominees listed below, all of whom are currently serving on our Board, be elected to serve as directors until the 20172024 annual meeting of shareholdersstockholders or until his or her successor istheir successors are duly elected and qualified.qualify. The Board of Directors does not know of any reason why any nominee would not be able to serve as a director. However, if any nominee were to become unable to serve as a director, the Board of Directors may designate a substitute nominee, in which case the persons named as proxies will vote for such substitute nominee.nominee at the 2023 annual meeting of stockholders. Alternatively, the Board of Directors may reduce the number of directors to be elected at the Annual Meeting.
Board of Directors’ Recommendation
The Board of Directors recommends that you vote
FOR each of the seven nominees listed below for director.
1 Medical Properties Trust

annual meeting.


LOGO

Proposal 1: Election Of Directors

LOGO

Summary Information about Our Director Nominees
Edward K. Aldag, Jr.
Age 52
Mr. Aldag is our founder and has served as our Chief Executive Officer and President since August 2003 and as Chairman of our Board of Directors since March 2004.
The Board believes that Mr. Aldag’s position as the founder of our Company and his extensive experience in the healthcare and REIT industries make him highly qualified to serve as Chairman of our Board of Directors.
Mr. Aldag served as Vice Chairman of our Board of Directors from August 2003 until March 2004 and as our Secretary from August 2003 until March 2005. Prior to that, Mr. Aldag served as an executive officer and director with our predecessor from its inception in August 2002 until August 2003. From 1986 to 2001, Mr. Aldag managed two private real estate companies, Guilford Capital Corporation and Guilford Medical Properties, Inc. Mr. Aldag served as President and as member of the board of directors of Guilford Medical Properties, Inc. Mr. Aldag was the President of Guilford Capital Corporation from 1998 to 2001, served as Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer from 1990 to 1998, and was a member of the board of directors from 1990 to 2001. Mr. Aldag received his B.S. in Commerce & Business from the University of Alabama with a major in corporate finance.
G. Steven Dawson
Age 58
Mr. Dawson has served as a member of our Board of Directors and as Chairman of our Audit Committee since April 2004.
The Board believes that Mr. Dawson’s substantial experience as a board member and committee chairman at other public REITs, along with his strong skills in corporate finance, strategic planning, and public company oversight, make him a valued advisor and highly qualified to serve as a member of our Board of Directors and as Chairman of our Audit Committee.
Since 2003, Mr. Dawson has primarily been a private investor serving on the boards of numerous public and private REITs. Currently, he is a founding partner and management committee member for a private U.S./Canadian fund that owns and manages industrial distribution assets in the U.S. Previously, he served as President, Chief Executive Officer and Trustee of a privately held U.S./Canadian firm that owned and operated manufactured housing assets located in the U.S. From July 1990 to September 2003, he served as Chief Financial Officer and Senior Vice President-Finance of Camden Property Trust (and its predecessors) (NYSE:CPT), a REIT specializing in apartment communities based in Houston, Texas. Mr. Dawson serves on the board of directors and as the nominating and corporate governance committee chairman as well as a member of the audit and compensation committees for Institutional Financial Markets, Inc. (AMEX:IFMI), an investment firm specializing in credit-related fixed income investments. Mr. Dawson also serves on the board of directors and as audit committee chairman of American Campus Communities (NYSE:ACC), a developer, owner and manager of student housing communities. Mr. Dawson holds a degree in business from Texas A&M University and is a member of the Real Estate Roundtable at the Mays Graduate School of Business at Texas A&M University.
Proxy Statement and Notice of 2016 Annual Meeting 2


  

 

Director Qualifications and Experience

 

 
  LOGO  LOGO  LOGO  LOGO  LOGO  LOGO  LOGO  LOGO  LOGO  LOGO 
 Director Nominees Strategic
Planning
  Executive
Leadership
  Risk
Management
  REIT / Real
Estate
  Health Care
Industry
  Finance &
Accounting
  Investment  Legal /
Regulatory
  Cyber  ESG 

 Edward K. Aldag, Jr.

  X   X   X   X   X   X   X   X   

 G. Steven Dawson

  X   X   X   X    X   X    

 R. Steven Hamner

  X   X   X   X   X   X   X   X   

 Caterina A. Mozingo

  X    X   X   X   X      X 

 Emily W. Murphy

  X   X   X   X     X   X   X   X 

 Elizabeth N. Pitman

  X    X   X   X    X   X   X  

 D. Paul Sparks, Jr.

  X   X   X   X    X   X     X 

 Michael G. Stewart

  X   X   X   X   X     X   

 C. Reynolds Thompson, III

  X   X   X   X   X   X   X    X  

 Percentage of Directors

 

   

 

100

 

%  

 

   

 

78

 

%  

 

   

 

100

 

%  

 

   

 

100

 

%  

 

   

 

67

 

%  

 

   

 

67

 

%  

 

   

 

78

 

%  

 

   

 

56

 

%  

 

   

 

33

 

%  

 

   

 

33

 

%  

 

LOGO

Proposal 1: Election Of Directors
R. Steven Hamner
Age 59
Mr. Hamner is one of our founders and has served as our Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer since September 2003 and as a member of our Board of Directors since February 2005.
The Board believes that Mr. Hamner’s position as a co-founder of our Company and his extensive experience in the real estate and healthcare industries and in the corporate finance sector make him highly qualified to serve as a member of our Board of Directors.
In August and September 2003, Mr. Hamner served as our Executive Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer. From October 2001 through March 2004, he was the Managing

Proxy Statement and Notice of 2023 Annual Meeting    1 


Proposal 1: Election of Directors

Director of Transaction Analysis LLC, a company that provided interim and project-oriented accounting and consulting services to commercial real estate owners and their advisors. From June 1998 to September 2001, he was Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of United Investors Realty Trust, a publicly traded REIT. For the ten years prior to becoming an officer of United Investors Realty Trust, he was employed by the accounting and consulting firm Ernst & Young LLP and its predecessors. Mr. Hamner received a B.S. in Accounting from Louisiana State University.
Robert E. Holmes, Ph.D.
Age 74
Dr. Holmes has served as a member of our Board of Directors since April 2004.
The Board believes that Dr. Holmes’ position as a well-respected leader in the business community and his deep understanding of the corporate and economic challenges faced by public companies today make him a valued advisor and highly qualified to serve as a member of our Board of Directors and as Chairman of our Ethics, Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee.
Dr. Holmes, our Lead Independent Director, retired in 2009 as Professor of Management, Dean, and Wachovia Chair of Business Administration at the University of Alabama at Birmingham School of Business, positions he held since 1999. From 1995 to 1999, he was Dean of the Olin Graduate School of Business at Babson College in Wellesley, Massachusetts. Prior to that, he was Dean of the James Madison University College of Business in Harrisonburg, Virginia, for 12 years. He is the co-author of four management textbooks, numerous articles, papers, and cases, and has served as a board member or consultant to a variety of business firms and non-profit organizations. He is past president of the Southern Business Administration Association, is actively engaged in AACSB International — the Association to Advance Collegiate Schools of Business, and served on the boards of the Entrepreneurial Center, Tech Birmingham, the Alabama Council on Economic Education, and other organizations. Dr. Holmes received a bachelor’s degree from the University of Texas at Austin, an MBA from University of North Texas, and a Ph.D. with an emphasis on management strategy from the University of Arkansas.
3 Medical Properties Trust

Nominees


Edward K. Aldag, Jr.

Director since: 2004

Founder, Chairman, Chief Executive Officer, and President

Age: 59

Committees:

Investment (Chair)

Environmental and Social

Risk

The Board believes that Mr. Aldag’s position as the founder of our Company, and his extensive experience in the healthcare and REIT industries, make him highly qualified to serve as Chairman of our Board.

Mr. Aldag launched our Company in 2003 as the nation’s only REIT focusing exclusively on hospitals. Today, Medical Properties Trust is the established leader in the hospital REIT sector, with 444 facilities across the United States, Western Europe, South America, and Australia. Under Mr. Aldag’s leadership, MPT’s assets have grown to approximately $20 billion, and the Company has become the second largest U.S. based owner of hospital beds, with approximately 44,000 in its portfolio.

Mr. Aldag serves on the Board of Children’s of Alabama, one of the nation’s leading hospitals for children. He is Vice Chairman of the Alabama Children’s Hospital Foundation and Chairman of the Foundation’s Investment Committee. He also serves as a board member for Mitchell’s Place, benefitting children with autism; the Birmingham Education Foundation, dedicated to increasing the number of students in Birmingham City Schools who are on the path to college, career and life readiness; the American Sports Medicine Institute, which works to understand, prevent and treat sports-related injuries; and serves as a member of the Executive Committee of the Birmingham Business Alliance. He is a guest lecturer at both the University of Alabama and the University of Alabama at Birmingham (“UAB”) and part of the UAB President’s Campaign Leadership Cabinet for a $1 billion campaign. In November 2017, he was selected as a member of the National Advisory Board of Governors for Nareit.

Mr. Aldag was appointed as a board member of Infracore SA in May 2019 and as a board member of Générale-Beaulieu Immobilière SA in June 2020, both private foreign companies. A native of Eufaula, Alabama, Mr. Aldag is a graduate of the University of Alabama, where he majored in finance.

G. Steven

Dawson

Director since: 2004

Independent Director

Age: 65

Committees:

Audit (Chair)

Investment

The Board believes that Mr. Dawson’s substantial experience as a board member and committee chairman of other public REITs, along with his strong skills in corporate finance, strategic planning and public company oversight, make him a valued advisor and highly qualified to serve as a member of our Board and as Chairman of our Audit Committee.

Since 2003, Mr. Dawson has primarily been a private investor focused on real estate and financial services in the U.S. and Canada and has served on the boards of numerous public and private REITs and other companies. From July 1990 to September 2003, he served as Chief Financial Officer and Senior Vice President – Finance of Camden Property Trust (and its predecessors) (NYSE: CPT), a REIT specializing in apartment communities based in Houston, Texas.

Mr. Dawson currently serves on the Board of Directors and as Audit Committee chairman, as well as a member of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and Compensation Committee for Cohen & Co. (NYSE American: COHN), a broker-dealer and an investment banking firm specializing in special purpose acquisition companies and credit-related fixed income investments in the U.S. and Europe. He is also the Chairman of the Board of Trustees for Nova Net Lease REIT (CSE: NNL-U.CN), a small Canadian company investing in specialty industrial properties in the U.S. Mr. Dawson holds a degree in business from Texas A&M University and is a member of the Real Estate Roundtable at the Mays Graduate School of Business at Texas A&M University.

LOGO

Proposal 1: Election Of Directors
MPT
Sherry A. Kellett
Age 71
Ms. Kellett has served as a member of our Board of Directors since February 2007.
The Board believes that Ms. Kellett’s experience as a board member and audit committee member at other public companies, along with her extensive experience in corporate finance and the financial sector generally, make her a valued advisor and highly qualified to serve as a member of our Board of Directors.
Ms. Kellett is a certified public accountant and served as Senior Executive Vice President and Corporate Controller of BB&T Corporation (NYSE:BBT), a financial holding company, from 1995 until her retirement in August 2003. Ms. Kellett served as Corporate Controller of Southern National Corporation, a bank holding company, from 1991 until 1995, when it merged with BB&T Corporation. Ms. Kellett previously held several positions at Arthur Andersen & Co. She is currently a member of the board of directors and chair of the audit committee of Highwoods Properties, Inc., a self-administered REIT based in Raleigh, North Carolina (NYSE:HIW). Ms. Kellett also serves on the board of directors, as chair of the audit committee and on the compensation committee and the compliance committee of MidCountry Financial Corp., a privately held financial institution based in Macon, Georgia. Ms. Kellett has also served on the boards of the North Carolina School of the Arts Foundation, Piedmont Kiwanis Club, Senior Services, Inc., The Winston-Salem Foundation, the Piedmont Club, and the North Carolina Center for Character Education, and she is a member of the North Carolina Zoological Park Council, a gubernatorial appointment.
William G. McKenzie (Gil)
Age 57
Mr. McKenzie is one of our founders and has served as a director since our formation.
The Board believes that Mr. McKenzie’s position as a co-founder of our Company and his extensive experience in the healthcare industry make him a valued advisor and highly qualified to serve as a member of our Board of Directors.
From September 2003 to January 2012, Mr. McKenzie served as the Vice Chairman of our Board of Directors, and he served as the Executive Chairman of our Board of Directors in August and September 2003. From May 2003 to August 2003, he was an executive officer and director of our predecessor. From 1998 to the present, Mr. McKenzie has served as President, Chief Executive Officer, and Chairman of the Board of Gilliard Health Services, Inc., a privately held owner and operator of acute care hospitals that Mr. McKenzie currently owns and co-founded in 1981. From 1996 to 1998, he was Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer of the Mississippi Hospital Association’s for-profit subsidiary, Diversified Services, Inc. (DSI). During his brief tenure at DSI, Mr. McKenzie founded and managed The Health Insurance Exchange, a mutual company, health insurance company and HMO. From 1994 to 1996, Mr. McKenzie was Senior Vice President of Managed Care and Executive Vice President of Physician Solutions, Inc., a physician practice management subsidiary he founded for Vaughan HealthCare, a 501(c)(3) healthcare company in Alabama. From 1981 to 1994, Mr. McKenzie was Hospital Administrator and Chief Financial Officer and held other management positions with Gilliard Health Services, Inc. Mr. McKenzie received a Master of Science in Health Administration from the University of Colorado and a B.S. in Business Administration from Troy University. He has served in numerous leadership capacities with the Alabama Hospital Association and local civic organizations, including eight years of service on the Board of Directors for the Montgomery Academy.
Proxy Statement and Notice of 2016 Annual Meeting 4

 2    Proxy Statement and Notice of 2023 Annual Meeting


Proposal 1: Election of Directors

LOGO

R. Steven

Hamner

Director since: 2005

Founder, Executive Vice President, and Chief
Financial Officer

Age: 66

Committees:

Investment

Risk

The Board believes that Mr. Hamner’s position as a co-founder of our Company, and his extensive experience in the real estate and healthcare industries and in the corporate finance sector, make him highly qualified to serve as a member of our Board.

In August and September 2003, Mr. Hamner served as our Executive Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer. From October 2001 through March 2004, he was the Managing Director of Transaction Analysis LLC, a company that provided interim and project-oriented accounting and consulting services to commercial real estate owners and their advisors. From June 1998 to September 2001, he was Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of United Investors Realty Trust, a publicly traded REIT. For the 10 years prior to becoming an officer of United Investors Realty Trust, he was employed by the accounting and consulting firm of Ernst & Young LLP and its predecessors.

Mr. Hamner received a B.S. in Accounting from Louisiana State University.

Caterina A.

Mozingo

Director since: 2020

Independent Director

Age: 55

Committees:

Environmental and Social (Chair)

Risk

The Board believes that Ms. Mozingo’s experience as a certified public accountant and consultant to real estate and healthcare companies, and her experience providing tax consulting services to for profit and not-for-profit companies, including publicly traded and privately held entities, make her highly qualified to serve as a member of our Board.

Ms. Mozingo is a tax partner with Aldridge, Borden & Company, P.C., a CPA firm that she joined in 1995. Her experience at Aldridge, Borden & Company includes a broad range of tax consulting and compliance services for businesses, individuals, fiduciaries, and tax-exempt entities. She began her career in public accounting with Coopers & Lybrand, LLP.

Ms. Mozingo is a member of the American Institute of CPAs, and the Alabama Society of CPAs, where she serves on the State Taxation Committee. Ms. Mozingo graduated summa cum laude from the University of Alabama in Commerce and Business Administration before earning a Master of Tax Accounting degree. Ms. Mozingo holds the Personal Financial Specialist designation awarded by the AICPA.

D. Paul Sparks, Jr.
Age 53
Mr. Sparks has served as a member of our Board of Directors since September 2014.
The Board believes that Mr. Sparks’ substantial experience in executive positions and his ability to guide companies through periods of growth and development make him a valued advisor and qualified to serve as Chairman of the Compensation Committee and as a member of our Board of Directors.
Mr. Sparks retired in January 2016 after a 32-year career in the energy industry. He was Senior Vice President Resource Development for Energen Resources Corporation (NYSE: EGN) and served in various capacities with Energen since 1989, including Senior Vice President of Operations from 2006 until 2012. Mr. Sparks worked with Amoco Corporation, a global chemical and oil company, in Texas and Louisiana prior to joining Energen. During the last 27 years, Mr. Sparks helped Energen grow from a small regulated utility to a top 20 U.S. independent oil and gas exploration and production company. His personnel responsibilities grew during the same period from managing 40 to over 350 people while Senior Vice President of Operations. In his pre-retirement role, he was responsible for the forward-looking strategy and implementation of valuing and developing the assets of Energen Resources Corporation. Mr. Sparks is active in a number of organizations: he is the current chairman of the New Mexico Oil and Gas Association, past advisor to the Gas Research Institute, a board member of the Independent Petroleum Association of America and past officer of the Society of Petroleum Engineers. He has authored a number of peer-reviewed publications and holds a patent in oil and gas technology. Mr. Sparks is a member of the Sunrise Rotary and the Downtown Exchange Club and past chairman of Mountain Brook Athletics. He is a 1984 graduate of Mississippi State University with a degree in Petroleum Engineering. He is also a Bagley College of Engineering Distinguished Fellow.
5 Medical Properties Trust

Proxy Statement and Notice of 2023 Annual Meeting    3 


Proposal 1: Election of Directors

LOGO

Emily W.

Murphy

Director since: 2022

Independent Director

Age: 49

Committees:

Ethics, Nominating and Corporate Governance

Environmental and Social

The Board believes that Ms. Murphy’s legal background and extensive knowledge of managing the growth of large organizations make her a valued advisor and highly qualified to serve as a member of our Board.

Ms. Murphy is a leading expert in government contracting and government business. She served as Administrator of the U.S. General Services Administration (“GSA”) from 2017 to 2021, leading a workforce of more than 11,000 federal employees and overseeing 371 million square feet of office space and $75 billion in annual contracts. During her time as GSA Administrator, she had ultimate supervisory authority of the Office of High-Performance Green Buildings, as established in 42 U.S. Code § 17092. She was a member of the Federal Acquisitions Security Committee, which dealt with risk management around IT and the IT supply chain. Under her leadership, GSA significantly increased its sales and revenues, saved customer agencies more than $20 billion and recorded the highest customer, vendor, and employee satisfaction scores in the history of the agency.

Before her service as the GSA Administrator, Ms. Murphy was GSA’s first Chief Acquisition Officer during the administration of President George W. Bush, where she was responsible for more than $40 billion in acquisition programs. Prior to this, she served at the U.S. Small Business Administration as the Senior Advisor for Government Contracting and Business Development and as Acting Associate Administrator for Government Contracting. In addition to her senior roles in the Executive Branch, Ms. Murphy spent nine years serving in various procurement policy and leadership roles for the House of Representatives, including Counsel and Professional Staff Member to the Committee on Armed Services and Senior Counsel and Policy Director for the Committee on Small Business.

In the private sector, Ms. Murphy was the General Counsel and Vice President for Operations for TerreStar National Services, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of TerreStar Networks, and practiced government contracts law with the firm of Wiley, Rein & Fielding (now Wiley). She is a graduate of the University of Virginia School of Law and Smith College and is a member of the Young Presidents Organization, the Economic Club of Washington, D.C., and the Chief Executives Organization.

She currently serves as Senior Fellow with the Center for Government Contracting at George Mason University’s School of Business. She works as a coach for high growth businesses with CEO Coaching International and serves on the Board of Advisors for SkillStorm and Vita Inclinata.

Elizabeth N.

Pitman

Director since: 2018

Independent Director

Age: 59

Committees:

Ethics, Nominating and Corporate Governance (Chair)

Risk (Chair)

Environmental and Social

The Board believes that Ms. Pitman’s experience as a healthcare lawyer, and her experience providing counsel to publicly traded and privately owned hospitals and healthcare systems, make her highly qualified to serve as a member of our Board.

Ms. Pitman has been an attorney with Holland & Knight, LLP, formerly Waller, Landen, Dortch & Davis, LLP, known as leading provider of legal services to the healthcare industry, since 2015. From July 2013 to December 2013, she worked as corporate counsel for Vitera Healthcare Solutions, LLC, and prior to that, from October 2008 to July 2013, she served as general counsel at Success EHS, Inc., both providers of electronic health records and revenue cycle management solutions. Ms. Pitman has provided counsel to companies, hospitals and healthcare systems, surgery centers, physician groups and healthcare information technology companies on a variety of matters, including healthcare regulatory, privacy, data and cyber security compliance, technology licensing, and mergers and acquisitions.

Ms. Pitman earned a B.S. in Accounting from the University of Alabama and a Juris Doctorate from the University of Alabama School of Law.

Proposal 1: Election of Directors

 4    Proxy Statement and Notice of 2023 Annual Meeting


Proposal 1: Election of Directors

D. Paul

Sparks, Jr.

Director since: 2014

Independent Director

Age: 60

Committees:

Audit

Compensation

Investment

The Board believes that Mr. Sparks’ substantial experience in executive positions, and his ability to guide companies through periods of growth and development, make him a valued advisor and qualified to serve as a member of our Board.

Mr. Sparks retired in January 2016 after a 32-year career in the energy industry. Prior to his retirement, he was Senior Vice President of Resource Development for Energen Resources Corporation (NYSE: EGN), holding various positions with Energen since 1989, including Senior Vice President of Operations from 2006 until 2012. During his 27 years at Energen, Mr. Sparks helped Energen grow from a small, regulated utility to a top 20 independent oil and gas exploration and production company in the U.S. Mr. Sparks was responsible for the forward-looking strategy and implementation of valuing and developing the assets of Energen Resources Corporation. Prior to joining Energen, Mr. Sparks worked with Amoco Corporation, a global chemical and oil company in Texas and Louisiana.

Mr. Sparks has been active in a number of organizations. He is the former Chairman of the New Mexico Oil and Gas Association, past advisor to the Gas Research Institute, a former board member of the Independent Petroleum Association of America and past officer of the Society of Petroleum Engineers. He has authored a number of peer-reviewed publications and holds a patent in oil and gas technology. Mr. Sparks is a 1984 graduate of Mississippi State University with a degree in Petroleum Engineering. He is also a Bagley College of Engineering Distinguished Fellow and a member of the College’s Advisory Board.

Michael G.

Stewart

Director since: 2016

Lead Independent Director

Age: 67

Committees:

Compensation

Environmental and Social

Ethics, Nominating and Corporate Governance

The Board believes that Mr. Stewart’s legal background, and his extensive knowledge of healthcare, legal and corporate governance and addressing various healthcare issues, make him a valued advisor and highly qualified to serve as a member of our Board.

Mr. Stewart is presently a private investor. He served as Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary of the Company from 2005 – 2010. Mr. Stewart formerly worked with law firms Berkowitz, Lefkovits, Isom & Kushner (now Baker Donelson) and Constangy, Brooks & Smith, having a law practice that encompassed corporate, healthcare, litigation, employment, and labor. Mr. Stewart also served as Vice President and General Counsel of Complete Health Services, Inc. (later, United Healthcare of the South). Throughout his professional career, he has provided private consulting services to physician groups and other healthcare providers. Mr. Stewart is the author of four novels that have been published by G.P. Putnam’s Sons and Random House.

He is a graduate of Auburn University with a B.S. degree in Business Administration with an emphasis in Information Systems and received his Juris Doctorate degree from the Cumberland School of Law at Samford University.

Proxy Statement and Notice of 2023 Annual Meeting    5 


Proposal 1: Election of Directors

C. Reynolds

Thompson, III

Director since: 2016

Independent Director

Age: 60

Committees:

Compensation (Chair)

Audit

Investment

The Board believes that Mr. Thompson’s significant executive experience, and his deep understanding of all aspects of REITs, make him a valued advisor and well qualified to serve as a member of our Board.

Mr. Thompson has served as Chairman and Chief Investment Officer of Select Strategies Realty of Cincinnati (“Select”), a privately held real estate investment company that specializes in the development, acquisition, management, and leasing of retail and mixed-use real estate in Midwestern and Southeastern U.S. since 2014. Select has sponsored retail investments in excess of $400 million and has provided management and leasing services for over five million retail square feet. Founded in 2005, the firm has 7 offices along with its Cincinnati headquarters. The company manages and leases retail assets in nine states as well as office and multifamily assets in Ohio and Kentucky. Prior to joining Select, Mr. Thompson was President and Chief Financial Officer (1997 – 2013) of Colonial Properties Trust, a $4 billion publicly traded REIT with a portfolio of multifamily, office, retail, and mixed-use assets. During a 16-year career with Colonial, he also served as CEO, COO and CIO. He served on Colonial’s risk management committee and was part of reviewing and maintaining the Colonial’s business continuity plan. He has extensive public company management, operating and investment experience having raised $950 million in equity, $2.5 billion in debt and completed acquisitions totaling $3 billion. Prior to this, Mr. Thompson worked in acquisitions and due diligence for Carr America Realty Corporation, a then publicly traded REIT. Mr. Thompson began his career as a commercial lending officer at SunTrust Bank (now Truist Bank).

Mr. Thompson is a member of the Board of Visitors of the Culverhouse College of Business at the University of Alabama. He previously served on the Board of Governors of Nareit, and the board of directors of the Birmingham Business Alliance and United Way of Central Alabama. Mr. Thompson holds a B.S. degree with Special Attainments in Commerce from Washington and Lee University.

 6    Proxy Statement and Notice of 2023 Annual Meeting


Proposal 1: Election of Directors

Governance Information Regarding Our Board of Directors

Annual Election of Directors

Our Board members stand for election each year. They serve until the next annual meeting of stockholders or until their respective successors are elected and qualified,qualify, subject to their prior death, resignation, retirement, death, disqualification, or removal from office. We do not have a classified board and our charter bars us, absent the approval of our shareholders,stockholders, from adopting the Maryland Unsolicited Takeover Act, which, among other things, permits the board of directors of a Maryland corporation to classify itself without a shareholderstockholder vote.
We maintain a majority vote standard and director resignation policy for uncontested director elections.

Independent Directors
The

A majority of our Board and each of our Audit Committee, Compensation Committee and Ethics, Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee is comprised of directors who qualify as independent under the standards of the New York Stock Exchange (the “NYSE”(“NYSE”) listing standards require that a majority of our directors qualify as independent as defined by the NYSE. The NYSE listing standards also require that. Each year, we affirmatively determine that each director deemed independent by the NYSE’s definitionunder NYSE standards has no material relationship with us (either directly or as a partner, shareholderstockholder or officer of an organization that has a relationship with us). The Board of Directors has determined that five directors — seven of the director nominees—G. Steven Dawson, Robert E. Holmes, Ph.D., SherryCaterina A. Kellett, William G. McKenzie, andMozingo, Emily W. Murphy, Elizabeth N. Pitman, D. Paul Sparks, Jr., Michael G. Stewart, and C. Reynolds Thompson, III—have no relationship with us that would interfere with such person’stheir ability to exercise independent judgment as a member of our Board, and that they otherwise qualify as “independent” under the NYSE’s listingNYSE standards.

Independent Board Leadership
Three

Two of Medical Properties Trust’s fourour founders still serve as members of the Board of Directors.Board. Studies regularly show that founder-led companies outperform their peers.peers[i] We are therefore fortunate not to have to rely exclusively on governance mechanisms to ensure that our Board exercises robust, effective, and independent leadership.
. We preserve the benefits that founder-led companies enjoyhave by maintaining our founder, Mr. Aldag, as Chairman and Chief Executive officer. That dynamic is of particular importance in a founder-led company like ours, though we regularly review this structure and its alternatives.
Officer.

We supplement our Board’s independence with a Lead Independent Director, currently Mr. Stewart, to whom the Board has given substantial powers and authorities. Our Lead Independent Director presides at all meetings of the Board at which the Chairman is not present and at all executive sessions of the independent directors. He serves as principal liaison between the Chairman and the independent directors, advising the Chairman on the quality, quantity and timeliness of the information presented to the Board. He advises the Chairman on the agendas for Board meetings and calls meetings of the independent directors, if deemed necessary or appropriate. The Lead Independent Director also oversees the annual self-evaluation of the Board. The Board can also, at its discretion, add tosupplement the Lead Independent Director’s responsibilities.

We believe there are risks in relying exclusively on independent board chairs or lead independent directors for board independence. We therefore value — value—and have — have—strong independent committee chairs on our Board. We also believe that our founder-led culture enables robust and honest interactions from all of our Board members, each of whom brings important and diverse skill sets to their jobs. Finally, the Board completes an annual board evaluationself-evaluation process that is discussedinstituted by the Ethics, Nominating and Corporate Governance Committeeour Lead Independent Director and presented to the full Board.

[i]See, Chris Zook, “Founder-Led“Founder-Led Companies Outperform the Rest—Here’s Why” in Harvard Business Review, March 24, 2016.
Proxy Statement and Notice of 2016 Annual Meeting 6


LOGO

Proposal 1: Election of Directors

Proxy Statement and Notice of 2023 Annual Meeting    7 


Proposal 1: Election of Directors

Risk Oversight

Our Board of Directors plays a central role in overseeing and evaluating risk.risks pertinent to our Company. While it is management’s responsibility to identify and manage our risk exposure to risk on a day-to-day basis, the Board routinely discusses these risks with management and actively oversees our risk-management procedures and protocols. The BoardRisk Committee regularly receives reports from senior management on areas of material risk to the Company, including operational, financial, legal, regulatory, cybersecurity and strategic risks. In addition, each of the Audit Committee, the Compensation Committee and the Ethics, Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee eachvarious committees exercises oversight and provides guidance relating to the particular risks within the purview of each committee, as well as making periodic reports to the full Board. Our Board of Directors also oversees risk by means of the required approval by our Board offor significant transactions and other decisions, including material acquisitions or dispositions of property, material capital markets transactions, significant capital expendituresimprovement projects and important employment-related decisions.

Board Committees and Meetings

Our Board of Directors and our Board’s fourits six standing committees hold regular meetings. In 2015,2022, the Board of Directors met five times; the Audit Committee met fourfive times; the Ethics, Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee met two times;one time; the Compensation Committee met fivethree times; the Risk Committee met one time; and the Investment Committee met atacted by written consent in nine instances. The Environmental and Social Committee did not meet in 2022. In 2022, each of the Board of Directors. In 2015, all directorsincumbent director attended at least 75% of (i) the total number of meetings of the Board andheld during the committees onperiod for which he or she was a director and (ii) the total number of meetings of all committees of the Board on which the director served during the periods that he or she served.

The Board of Directors regularly meets in executive session without any non-independent directors present. Dr. HolmesMr. Stewart has been designated as the Lead Independent Director and in that capacity presides at these executive sessions. Dr. HolmesMr. Stewart may be contacted directly by shareholdersstockholders at rholmes@medicalpropertiestrust.com. Themstewart@mpt.net. Our directors of the Company are encouraged to attend our annual meeting of shareholdersstockholders absent cause. All directors of the Company holding their position at the time of the meeting attended our 20152022 annual meeting of shareholders.
stockholders.

Committees of the Board of Directors

The Board of Directors delegates certain of its functions to its standing committees.
The

Audit Committee
G. Steven Dawson Chairman
Sherry A. Kellett
D. Paul Sparks, Jr.
The Board of Directors has determined that each member of the Audit Committee is financially literate and satisfies the additional NYSE independence requirements for audit committee members, and that each member of the Audit Committee qualifies as an “audit committee financial expert” under current Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) regulations. The Board of Directors has also determined that service by Ms. Kellett and Mr. Dawson on other public companies’ audit committees has not impaired their abilities to effectively serve on our Audit Committee.
The Audit Committee oversees (i) our accounting and financial reporting processes, (ii) the integrity and audits of our financial statements, (iii) our compliance with legal and regulatory requirements, (iv) the qualifications and independence of our independent auditors, and (v) the performance of our internal and independent auditors. The specific functions and responsibilities of the Audit Committee are set forth in the Audit Committee Charter, a copy of which is posted on our website at www.medicalpropertiestrust.com. The information on our website is not part of this Proxy Statement. The report of the Audit Committee appears on page 13 of this Proxy Statement.
7 Medical Properties Trust


G. Steven Dawson

Chairman

D. Paul Sparks, Jr.

C. Reynolds Thompson, III

The Board has determined that each member of the Audit Committee is financially literate and satisfies the additional NYSE independence requirements for audit committee members, and that Mr. Dawson and Mr. Thompson each qualifies as an “audit committee financial expert” under current Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) regulations. The Board has also determined that service by Mr. Dawson on other public companies’ audit committees has not impaired his ability to effectively serve on our Audit Committee.

The Audit Committee oversees (i) our accounting and financial reporting processes, (ii) the integrity and audits of our financial statements, (iii) our compliance with legal and regulatory requirements, (iv) the qualifications and independence of our independent auditors, and (v) the performance of our internal and independent auditors. The specific functions and responsibilities of the Audit Committee are set forth in the Audit Committee Charter, a copy of which is posted on our website at www.medicalpropertiestrust.com. The report of the Audit Committee appears on page 13 of this Proxy Statement.

LOGO

Proposal 1: Election of Directors
The

 8    Proxy Statement and Notice of 2023 Annual Meeting


Proposal 1: Election of Directors

Compensation Committee
D. Paul Sparks, Jr. Chairman
In 2015, L. Glenn Orr, Jr. served as Chairman of the Compensation Committee. Mr. Orr retired on April 3, 2016,

C. Reynolds Thompson, III

Chairman

Michael G. Stewart

D. Paul Sparks, Jr.

Pursuant to the NYSE listing standards, in determining the independence of the directors serving on the Compensation Committee, our Board considered all factors specifically relevant to determining whether a director has a relationship to us which is material to that director’s ability to be independent from our management in connection with the duties of a Compensation Committee member, including, but not limited to, such director’s source of compensation and whether such director is affiliated with us, one of our subsidiaries, or an affiliate of one of our subsidiaries. Based on these factors, the Board determined that all of the Compensation Committee members are independent.

The principal functions of the Compensation Committee are to evaluate the performance of our executive officers, review and approve the compensation for our executive officers, and review, administer and make recommendations to the full Board regarding our incentive compensation plans and equity-based plans. The Compensation Committee also reviews and approves corporate goals and objectives relevant to the Chief Executive Officer’s compensation, evaluates the Chief Executive Officer’s performance in light of those goals and objectives, and approves the Chief Executive Officer’s compensation. The Compensation Committee makes all compensation decisions with respect to the Chief Executive Officer and all other executive officers. The Chief Executive Officer is frequently asked to provide the Compensation Committee with the information it needs to perform these functions as well as to provide input and insights regarding each executive officer’s performance other than his own. The specific functions and responsibilities of the Compensation Committee are set forth in more detail in the Compensation Committee Charter, a copy of which is posted on our website at www.medicalpropertiestrust.com. The report of the Compensation Committee appears on page 36 of this Proxy Statement.

In 2022, the Compensation Committee engaged Gressle & McGinley, a nationally recognized compensation consultant. Gressle & McGinley assisted the Compensation Committee in determining the amount and form of executive compensation. The Compensation Committee also considered information presented by Gressle & McGinley when reviewing the appropriate types and levels of compensation for the Company’s non-employee director compensation program. Information concerning the nature and scope of Gressle & McGinley’s assignments and related disclosure is included in “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” beginning on page 19 of this Proxy Statement. The Compensation Committee has assessed the independence of Gressle & McGinley, as required under the NYSE listing rules. The Compensation Committee has also considered and assessed all relevant factors including, but not limited to, those set forth in Rule 10C-1(b)(4)(i) through (vi) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), that could give rise to a potential conflict of interest. Based on this review, the Compensation Committee has determined that Gressle & McGinley is independent and that their work has not raised any conflicts of interest.

Environmental and was replaced by Mr. Sparks. Pursuant to the NYSE listing standards, in determining the independence of the directors serving on the CompensationSocial Committee our Board of Directors considered all factors specifically relevant to determining whether a director has a relationship to us which is material to that director’s ability to be independent from our management in connection with the duties of a Compensation Committee member, including, but not limited to, such director’s source of compensation and whether such director is affiliated with us, one of our subsidiaries, or an affiliate of one of our subsidiaries.
Dr. Robert E. Holmes Sherry A. Kellett
The principal functions of the Compensation Committee are to evaluate the performance of our executive officers, review and approve the compensation for our executive officers, and review, administer and make recommendations to the full Board of Directors regarding our incentive compensation plans and equity-based plans. The Compensation Committee also reviews and approves corporate goals and objectives relevant to the Chief Executive Officer’s compensation, evaluates the Chief Executive Officer’s performance in light of those goals and objectives, and establishes the Chief Executive Officer’s compensation levels. The Compensation Committee makes all compensation decisions with respect to the Chief Executive Officer and all other executive officers. The Chief Executive Officer is frequently asked to provide the Compensation Committee with the information it needs to perform these functions as well as to provide input and insights regarding each executive officer’s performance. The specific functions and responsibilities of the Compensation Committee are set forth in more detail in the Compensation Committee’s Charter, a copy of which is posted on our website at www.medicalpropertiestrust.com. The report of the Compensation Committee appears on page 30 of this Proxy Statement.
In 2015, the Compensation Committee continued its engagement of FTI Consulting, Inc., or FTI Consulting, a nationally recognized compensation consultant specializing in the real estate industry. FTI Consulting assisted the Compensation Committee in determining the amount and form of executive compensation. The Compensation Committee also considered information presented by FTI Consulting when reviewing the appropriate types and levels for the Company’s non-employee director compensation program. Information concerning the nature and scope of FTI Consulting’s assignments and related disclosure is included in “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” beginning on page 15 of this Proxy Statement. The Compensation Committee has assessed the independence of FTI Consulting, as required under the NYSE listing rules. The Compensation Committee has also considered and assessed all relevant factors, including, but not limited to, those set forth in Rule 10C-1(b)(4)(i) through (vi) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), that could give rise to a potential conflict of interest. Based on this review, we are not aware of any conflict of interest that has been raised by the work performed by FTI Consulting. To bring additional perspective to our continually evolving and improving compensation plans, in 2016 the Compensation Committee retained Semler Brossy Consulting Group LLC (“Semler Brossy”), a nationally known compensation consulting firm as its new independent advisor.
Proxy Statement and Notice of 2016 Annual Meeting 8


Caterina A. Mozingo

Chairman

Edward K. Aldag, Jr.

Elizabeth N. Pitman

Michael G. Stewart

Emily W. Murphy

The Environmental and Social Committee is tasked with assisting the Board and management in addressing the Company’s activities in the areas of environmental and social responsibility (including its responsibilities to stockholders, employees, tenants, and the communities where it operates). The responsibilities of the Environmental and Social Committee include, among others, advising management with respect to the development, implementation and continuous improvement of programs, policies and practices relating to ESG matters. The Committee oversees the Company’s responsibilities in a wide range of areas, such as environmental, health and safety matters (including, but not limited to, compliance with governmental regulations), environmental sustainability and climate risk and political activities.

LOGO

Proposal 1: Election of Directors
The

Proxy Statement and Notice of 2023 Annual Meeting    9 


Proposal 1: Election of Directors

Ethics, Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee
Dr. Robert E. Holmes
Chairman
The Ethics, Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee is responsible for, among other things, recommending the nomination of qualified individuals to become directors to the full Board of Directors; recommending the composition of the Board’s committees to the full Board of Directors; periodically reviewing the performance and effectiveness of the Board of Directors as a body; and periodically reviewing our corporate governance guidelines and policies. In 2015, Ms. Kellett served as a member of this committee. The specific functions and duties of the Committee are set forth in its charter, a copy of which is posted on our website at www.medicalpropertiestrust.com.
William G. McKenzie
D. Paul Sparks, Jr.
The Ethics, Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will consider all potential candidates for nomination for election as directors who are recommended by the Company’s shareholders, directors, officers, or employees. All director recommendations must be made during the time periods provided and must provide the information required by Article II, Section 2.03 of the Company’s Second Amended and Restated Bylaws. All director recommendations should be sent to the Ethics, Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, c/o Secretary, Medical Properties Trust, Inc., 1000 Urban Center Drive, Suite 501, Birmingham, Alabama 35242. The Committee will screen all potential director candidates in the same manner, regardless of the source of their recommendation. The Committee’s review will typically be based on the written materials provided with respect to a potential director candidate. The Committee will evaluate and determine whether a potential candidate meets the Company’s minimum qualifications and requirements, whether the candidate has the specific qualities and skills for directors, and whether requesting additional information or an interview is appropriate. While the Committee considers different perspectives and skill sets when evaluating potential director candidates, the Committee has not established a formal policy regarding diversity in identifying candidates. The Committee nevertheless regularly reviews the composition of the Board as part of the annual self-evaluation process and seeks nominees who, taken as a whole, possess the experience and skills necessary for the effective functioning of the Board.
The Board of Directors has adopted the following minimum qualifications and specific qualities and skills for the Company’s directors, which will serve as the basis upon which potential director candidates are evaluated by the Ethics, Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee: (i) directors should possess the highest personal and professional ethics, integrity, and values; (ii) directors should have, or demonstrate an ability and willingness to acquire in short order, a clear understanding of the fundamental aspects of the Company’s business; (iii) directors should be committed to representing the long-term interests of our shareholders; (iv) directors should be willing to devote sufficient time to carry out their duties and responsibilities effectively and should be committed to serving on the Board of Directors for an extended period of time; and (v) directors should not serve on more than three boards of public companies in addition to our Board of Directors. The Ethics, Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee also takes into consideration the diversity of its Board, including breadth of experience and the ability to bring new and different perspectives to the Board.
The Ethics, Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee recommended the nomination of all seven of the incumbent directors for re-election to the Board of Directors. The entire Board of Directors approved such recommendation.
9
Medical Properties Trust


LOGO

Elizabeth N. Pitman

Chairman

Emily W. Murphy

Michael G. Stewart

Proposal 1: Election of Directors
MPT
The Ethics, Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee is responsible for, among other things, recommending the nomination of qualified individuals to become directors to the full Board; recommending the composition of the Board’s committees to the full Board; periodically reviewing the performance and effectiveness of the Board as a body; and periodically reviewing our corporate governance guidelines and policies. The specific functions and duties of the Committee are set forth in its charter, a copy of which is posted on our website at www.medicalpropertiestrust.com.

The Ethics, Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will consider all potential candidates for nomination for election as directors who are recommended by the Company’s stockholders, directors, officers, or employees. All director recommendations must be made during the time periods provided and must provide the information required by Article II, Section 2.03 of the Company’s Second Amended and Restated Bylaws (our “Bylaws”). All director recommendations should be sent to the Ethics, Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, c/o Secretary, Medical Properties Trust, Inc., 1000 Urban Center Drive, Suite 501, Birmingham, Alabama 35242. The Committee will screen all potential director candidates in the same manner, regardless of the source of their recommendation. The Committee’s review will typically be based on the written materials provided with respect to a potential director candidate. The Committee will evaluate and determine whether a potential candidate meets the Company’s minimum qualifications and requirements, whether the candidate has the specific qualities and skills for directors, and whether requesting additional information or an interview is appropriate. While the Committee considers different perspectives and skill sets when evaluating potential director candidates, the Committee has not established a formal policy regarding diversity in identifying candidates. The Committee nevertheless regularly reviews the composition of the Board as part of the annual self-evaluation process and seeks nominees who, taken as a whole, possess the experience and skills necessary for the effective functioning of the Board.

The Board has adopted the following minimum qualifications and specific qualities and skills for the Company’s directors, which serve as the basis upon which potential director candidates are evaluated by the Ethics, Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee:

   directors should possess the highest personal and professional ethics, integrity, and values;

   directors should have, or demonstrate an ability and willingness to acquire in short order, a clear understanding of the fundamental aspects of the Company’s business;

   directors should be committed to representing the long-term interests of our stockholders;

   directors should be willing to devote sufficient time to carry out their duties and responsibilities effectively and should be committed to serving on the Board for an extended period of time; and

   directors should not serve on more than three boards of public companies in addition to our Board.

The Ethics, Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee also takes into consideration the diversity of its Board, including breadth of experience and the ability to bring new and different perspectives to the Board.

The Ethics, Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee recommended the nomination of all nine of the incumbent directors for re-election to the Board. The entire Board approved such recommendation.

Investment Committee
Prior to 2016, the

Edward K. Aldag, Jr.

Chairman

G. Steven Dawson

R. Steven Hamner

D. Paul Sparks, Jr.

C. Reynolds Thompson, III

The Investment Committee, among other things, considers and takes action with respect to all acquisitions, dispositions, developments, and leasing of healthcare facilities in which our aggregate investment is between $20 million and $100 million.

 10    Proxy Statement and Notice of 2023 Annual Meeting


Proposal 1: Election of Directors

Risk Committee was comprised of all of our current directors.
Edward K. Aldag, Jr.
Chairman
The Investment Committee has the authority to, among other things, consider and take action with respect to all acquisitions, dispositions, developments, and leasing of healthcare facilities in which our aggregate investment will fall between $10 million and $50 million.
G. Steven Dawson
R. Steven Hamner
William G. McKenzie

Elizabeth N. Pitman

Chairman

Edward K. Aldag, Jr.

Caterina A. Mozingo

R. Steven Hamner

The Risk Committee is tasked with assisting the Board in its risk management and risk assessment activities, including through oversight of risks related to (i) business continuity, (ii) revenue concentration and the financial health and operational status of the Company’s tenants and operators, (iii) modifications to the Company’s strategies, (iv) industry trends and general economic conditions, (v) entrance into new markets, (vi) privacy concerns and security breaches and (vii) federal and state regulations. The responsibilities of the Risk Committee also include monitoring guidelines, policies and processes for monitoring and mitigating the various risks facing the Company.

Governance, Ethics, and Stockholder Communications

Corporate Governance Guidelines.Guidelines. In furtherance of its goal of providing effective governance of the Company’s business and affairs for the long-term benefit of its shareholders,stockholders, the Board of Directors has adopted Corporate Governance Guidelines. The Corporate Governance Guidelines are posted on our website at www.medicalpropertiestrust.com.

Code of Ethics and Business Conduct. The Company has adopted a Code of Ethics and Business Conduct, as approved by the Board, of Directors, which applies to all directors, officers, employees, and agents of the Company and its subsidiaries. The Code of Ethics and Business Conduct is posted on our website at www.medicalpropertiestrust.com.
www.medicalpropertiestrust.com/ethics-and-governance. We audit compliance with our Code of Ethics and Business Conduct with each officer and employee with a questionnaire that is required to be completed annually. We intend to disclose on our website any amendment to, or waiver of, any provision of the Code of Ethics and Business Conduct applicable to our directors and executive officers that would otherwise be required to be disclosed under the rules of the SEC or the NYSE.

Proxy Access Bylaw Provisions. In 2017, we amended our Bylaws to provide for “proxy access” for our stockholders. The proxy access provision permits a stockholder (or a group of up to 20 stockholders) that has owned at least 3% of our outstanding common stock for at least three years to nominate, and include in our proxy materials, up to the greater of two directors or 20% of the directors then in office; provided that the stockholders and the nominees satisfy the requirements specified in our Bylaws.

Stockholder and Interested Party Communications with the Board. Stockholders and all interested parties may communicate with the Board of Directors or any individual director regarding any matter that is within the responsibilities of the Board of Directors.Board. Stockholders and interested parties should send their communications to the Board, of Directors, or an individual director, c/o Secretary, Medical Properties Trust, Inc., 1000 Urban Center Drive, Suite 501, Birmingham, Alabama 35242. The Secretary will review the correspondence and forward any communication to the Board, of Directors, or the individual director, if the Secretary determines that the communication deals with the functions of the Board of Directors or requires the attention of the Board of Directors or the individual director. The Secretary will maintain a log of all communications received from shareholders.
stockholders.

We will provide, free of charge, hard copies of our Annual Report to Stockholders, our Form 10-K, our quarterly reportsAnnual Report on Form 10-Q, current reports10-K, our Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K, and all amendments to these reports as soon as reasonably practicable after such material is electronically filed with, or furnished to, the SEC. Also available, free of charge, are hard copies of our Corporate Governance Guidelines and our Code of Ethics and Business Conduct along with the charters of our Ethics, Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, our Audit Committee, and our Compensation Committee, and our Code of Ethics and Business Conduct.Committee. All of these documents are also available on our website at www.medicalpropertiestrust.com.
Proxy Statement and Notice of 2016 Annual Meeting 10


LOGO

Proposal 2:
Ratification of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

Proxy Statement and Notice of 2023 Annual Meeting    11 


LOGO

The Audit Committee of our Board of Directors has appointed PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm to audit our financial statements for the year ending December 31, 2016.2023. PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP served as our independent registered public accounting firm during the year that ended December 31, 2015.
Board of Directors’ Recommendation
The Board of Directors recommends that you vote FOR the ratification of the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the year ending December 31, 2016.
11
Medical Properties Trust

2022.


LOGO

Proposal 2: Ratification of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

LOGO

Independent Auditor

The Audit Committee of the Board of Directors has selected PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (“PwC”) as the independent auditor to perform the audit of our consolidated financial statements for the year ending December 31, 2016.2023. PwC, an independent registered public accounting firm, also performed the audit of our consolidated financial statements for 20152022, 2021, and 2014.2020. The Board of Directors has approved the appointment of PwC as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for 20162023 based on the recommendation of the Audit Committee.

Representatives of PwC are expected to be present atparticipate in the Annual Meeting.2023 annual meeting of stockholders. They will have an opportunity to make a statement if they so desire and will be available to respond to appropriate questions from our shareholders.
stockholders.

The Audit Committee is directly responsible for the appointment, compensation, and oversight of our independent auditor. In addition to retaining the independent auditor to audit our consolidated financial statements, the Audit Committee may retain the independent auditor to provide other auditing services. The Audit Committee understands the need for our independent auditor to maintain objectivity and independence in its audits of our financial statements.

To help ensure the independence of the independent auditor, the Audit Committee has adopted a policy for the pre-approval ofthat all audit and non-audit services to be performed by its independent auditor. Pursuant to this policy, all audit and non-audit services to be performed by the independent auditor must be approved in advance by the Audit Committee. The Audit Committee approved all audit and audit-related services provided to us by PwC during the 20152022 and 20142021 calendar years.

The table below sets forth the aggregate fees billed by PwC for audit and non-audit services:
Fees
2015
2014
Audit Fees
$965,827
$770,000
Audit-Related Fees


Tax Fees
386,774
325,402
All Other Fees


Total
$1,352,601
$1,095,402

 

 

  2022   2021 

Audit Fees

  $1,269,500   $1,295,000 

Audit-Related Fees

   -    - 

Tax Fees

   -    - 

All Other Fees

   26,669    28,263 

Total

  $1,296,169   $1,323,263 

In the above table, in accordance with the SEC’s definitions and rules, “audit fees” are fees for professional services for the audit of a company’s financial statements included in the annual report on Form 10-K, for the review of a company’s financial statements included in the quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, and for services that are normally provided by the accountant in connection with statutory and regulatory filings or engagements; “audit-related fees” are fees for assurance and related services that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of a company’s financial statements; “tax fees” are fees for tax compliance, tax advice, and tax planning; and “all other fees” are fees for any services not included in the first three categories.
Proxy Statement and Notice of 2016 Annual Meeting 12


LOGO

Proposal 2: Ratification of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

 12    Proxy Statement and Notice of 2023 Annual Meeting


Proposal 2: Ratification of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

Audit Committee Report

The Audit Committee is composed of three independent directors and operates under a written charter adopted by the Board, of Directors, a copy of which is available on our website. The Board of Directors has determined that each committee member is independent within the meaning of the NYSE listing standards.

Management is responsible for the Company’s accounting and financial reporting processes, including its internal control over financial reporting, and for preparing the Company’s consolidated financial statements. PwC, the Company’s independent auditor, is responsible for performing an audit of our consolidated financial statements in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (“PCAOB”) and for expressing an opinion as to whether the Company’s consolidated financial statements are fairly presented in all material respects in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America (“GAAP”). In this context, the responsibility of the Audit Committee is to oversee the Company’s accounting and financial reporting processes and the audits of the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In the performance of its oversight function, the Audit Committee reviewed and discussed with management and PwC the Company’s audited consolidated financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2015.2022. Management and PwC represented to the Audit Committee that the Company’s audited consolidated financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2015,2022, were prepared in accordance with GAAP. The Audit Committee also discussed with PwC the matters required to be discussed by the Statement of Auditing Standards No. 16,1301, as amended (“AS No. 16”1301”), as adopted by the PCAOB. AS No. 161301 sets forth requirements pertaining to the independent auditor’s communications with the Audit Committee regarding the conduct of the audit.

The Audit Committee received the written disclosures and the letter from PwC required by PCAOB Ethics and Independence Rule 3526, Communication with Audit Committees Concerning Independence (“Rule 3526”). Rule 3526 requires the independent auditor to provide written and oral communications prior to accepting an initial engagement conducted pursuant to the standards of the PCAOB and at least annually thereafter regarding all relationships between the auditor and the Company that, in the auditor’s professional judgment, may reasonably be thought to bear on independence, and to confirm that they are independent of the Company within the meaning of the securities acts administered by the SEC. The Audit Committee discussed with PwC any relationships that may impact their objectivity and independence and satisfied itself as to the firm’s independence.

The members of the Audit Committee are not professionally engaged in the practice of accounting or auditing and, as such, rely without independent verification on the information provided to them and on the representations made by management and PwC. Accordingly, the Audit Committee’s oversight does not provide an independent basis to determine that management has maintained appropriate accounting and financial reporting processes, or appropriate internal controls and procedures designed to assure compliance with the accounting standards and applicable laws and regulations. Furthermore, the reviews and discussions of the Audit Committee referred to above do not assure that the audit of the Company’s financial statements has been carried out in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards, that the Company’s audited consolidated financial statements are presented in accordance with GAAP, or that PwC is, in fact, independent.

Based on the Audit Committee’s review and the discussions described above, and subject to the limitations on its role and responsibilities described above and in the Audit Committee Charter, the Audit Committee recommended to the Board of Directors that the audited financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2015,2022, be included in the Company’s 2015 Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2022, for filing with the SEC.

The foregoing report is provided by the undersigned members of the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors.
G. Steven Dawson (Chairman) Sherry A. Kellett D. Paul Sparks, Jr.
13
Medical Properties Trust

Committee.


G. Steven Dawson (Chairman)D. Paul Sparks, Jr.C. Reynolds Thompson, III

LOGO

Proposal 3:
Advisory Vote to Approve Executive Compensation

Proxy Statement and Notice of 2023 Annual Meeting    13 


LOGO

The Company asks that you indicate your support for our named executive officers’ compensation policies and practices as described in the “CompensationCompensation Discussion and Analysis” or (“CD&A,&A”) and the accompanying tables and related disclosures beginning on the next page 19 of this Proxy Statement. This proposal, commonly known as a “say-on-pay”“Say-on-Pay” proposal, is required pursuant to Section 14A of the Exchange Act. While the say-on-paySay-on-Pay vote is advisory and therefore non-binding on the Company, the Board, of Directors,or the Compensation Committee, it gives our shareholdersstockholders the opportunity to express their views on our named executive officers’ compensation. Our Board and Compensation Committee members take the views of our stockholders seriously and act upontake these views; please see the summary of these actions beginning on page 15.views into consideration when making executive compensation decisions. This vote is not intended to address any specific item of compensation but rather the overall compensation of our executive officers and the policies and practices described in this Proxy Statement. We conduct an annual, non-binding say-on-paySay-on-Pay vote consistent with the recommendation of a majority of our shareholdersstockholders expressed by vote at our 2011 Annual Meeting.
2017 annual meeting of stockholders.

The Board of Directorsand the Compensation Committee will review the voting results of this advisory say-on-paySay-on-Pay vote and take them into consideration when structuring future executive compensation arrangements. The affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the shares of common stock represented in person or by proxy at the Annual Meeting2023 annual meeting of stockholders and entitled to vote on the proposal will be required for approval.

As we describe in further detail in the CD&A, we believe that the experience, abilities, and commitment of our executive officers are unique in the business of investing in hospital real estate and are therefore critical to the long-term achievement of our investment goals. Accordingly, the primary objectives of our executive compensation program are to retain our key leaders, attract future leaders and align our executives’ long-term interest with the interests of our shareholders.stockholders. The Board of Directors encourages you to carefully review the information regarding our executive compensation program contained in this Proxy Statement.

 14    Proxy Statement and Notice of 2023 Annual Meeting


LOGO

As required by Section 14A of the Exchange Act, we are seeking a non-binding, advisory recommendation from our stockholders as to the frequency of future non-binding, advisory votes on the compensation of our named executive officers. Stockholders may vote for a frequency of one, two or three years, or abstain.

We recommend that our stockholders select a frequency of one year, or an annual vote. We believe that this frequency is appropriate because it will continue to enable our stockholders to vote, on a non-binding, advisory basis, on the most recent executive compensation information that is presented in our Proxy Statement, leading to a more meaningful and coherent communication between the Company and our stockholders on the compensation of our named executive officers. An annual advisory vote on executive compensation is consistent with our policy of seeking regular input from, and engaging in discussions with, our stockholders on corporate governance matters and our executive compensation philosophy, policies and practices.

Based on the factors noted above, the Board recommends that future votes on executive compensation occur every year until the next non-binding, advisory vote on the frequency of Directors’ Recommendation
future non-binding, advisory votes on the compensation of our named executive officers, which will occur no later than our 2029 annual meeting of stockholders. Stockholders are not being asked to approve or disapprove the Board’s recommendation, but rather to indicate their choice among the following frequency options: every year, every two years, or every three years, or to abstain from voting. The Board of Directorsunanimously recommends that you vote FORfor a frequency of every “ONE YEAR” for future advisory votes on executive compensation.

Proxy Statement and Notice of 2023 Annual Meeting    15 


LOGO

We are a leading global provider of real estate capital to hospitals, and the following resolution:
“Resolved, thatsecond-largest non-governmental owner of hospitals in the shareholders advise that they APPROVEworld. We are unique among REITs due to our exclusive focus on investing in hospital real estate. Our hospitals and our tenant operators provided high quality care to millions of patients in the compensationUnited States and abroad in 2022. Domestically, this included approximately 500,000 admissions, nearly two million emergency room visits and 300,000 surgeries.

Environmental Sustainability

We recognize the importance of the Company’s named executive officers, as disclosed pursuantenvironmental stewardship, and we demonstrate this through initiatives in our corporate operations, development projects and, to the compensation disclosure rulesextent possible, our triple-net or absolute-net lease properties. Materially, all of our leases are triple-net or absolute-net leases, which means our tenants have ultimate responsibility for deciding when and how to implement environmentally sustainable practices at the Securitieshospitals they operate. However, we communicate regularly with our tenants regarding sustainability matters and Exchange Commission, which disclosure includes the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, the compensation tables, and any related material.”
Proxy Statement and Notice of 2016 Annual Meeting 14

their importance.


LOGO

Compensation Discussion and Analysis
Executive Summary
We Are Listening
For the past three years we have made continuousTherefore, our environmental sustainability initiatives focus on environmental improvements to our executive compensation planscorporate operations, environmental risk management in our development projects, and other important governance practices. Many of these have been direct resultsdialoguing with our tenants to better understand the environmental impact of our meetingsfacilities. We recognize that our facilities generate waste and other conversationsuse energy and water, which results in greenhouse gas emissions, and that these actions have an impact on the environment. We also work closely with third parties to conduct physical inspections of our shareholders —facilities.

For more information on our sustainability, please review our CRR which can be found on our website: https://www.medicalpropertiestrust.com/corporate-responsibility

 16    Proxy Statement and Notice of 2023 Annual Meeting


Corporate Responsibility

Human Capital Management

   As of April 2023, we are a team of approximately 124 professionals, and we are committed to providing a challenging and dynamic work environment and to supporting professional and personal growth and development needs.

   Our commitment to protecting the rights of our employees, and to keeping them safe, is confirmed in our Company-wide Human Rights Policy, which can be found on our website: https://medicalpropertiestrust.com/corporate-responsibility/.

   All employees are also required to adhere to the highest ethical standards, including those confirmed in our Company-wide Code of Ethics and Business Conduct which can be found on our website: https://medicalpropertiestrust.com/corporate-responsibility/.

   We offer a competitive benefits package and equal employment opportunities designed to help recruit and retain high-quality, motivated employees, and to ensure their health and security. This includes paid parental leave and incremental coverage for fertility assistance.

Competitive Employee Benefits

Top-of-the-line insurance coverage including health, secondary health, dental, vision and life, with individual coverage at no cost to employees

401(k) Plan with employer matching

Monthly Fitness Allowance for employees with gym memberships and/or training programs

Reimbursement for concierge physician

Employee Assistance Program at no cost to employee

Open, collaborative workspaces

Paid parental leave

Personnel development through trainings and conferences, including off-site corporate retreats

Additional paid time off day annually for charitable work

Incremental coverage for fertility assistance

We provide leadership training for employees who are moving into management roles, and we offer other training and continuing education opportunities. We pay expenses when employees attend continuing education courses in order to maintain their professional certifications. We also pay expenses when employees attend seminars and workshops on topics related to their job responsibilities.

As part of our ongoing commitment to data privacy and security, we also conduct cybersecurity and security awareness trainings throughout each year. These trainings are also part of the employee onboarding process.

We engage legal experts to provide training sessions on matters pertaining to (i) harassment in the workplace, (ii) Family and Medical Leave Act basics, (iii) legal issues in interviewing, (iv) promoting diversity in the workplace and (v) discrimination, disability, and documentation.

As in the prior two years, we issued an anonymous, independent employee engagement survey and in 2022, we received a 95% response rate, that covered topics such as company culture, work environment, training and development, and overall job satisfaction. The results of the surveys are presented to management and to the Board and used to assess potential human capital risks and identify opportunities for deeper employee engagement. Such surveys are valuable indicators, and in 2023, we issued another survey and may continue to use them to help manage human capital going forward.

We were ranked among the best places to work in healthcare in Modern Healthcare’s Best Places to Work 2022, a premier award program in the top U.S. healthcare news publication.

Proxy Statement and Notice of 2023 Annual Meeting    17 


Corporate Responsibility

We are firmly committed to providing equal opportunity in all aspects of employment and absolutely forbid discrimination against any person or harassment, intimidation or hostility of any kind, including on the basis of race, ethnicity, religion, color, sex, sexual orientation, sexual or gender identity, age, disability, national origin, military or veteran status, or retaliation against any other characteristic or conduct that may be protected by applicable local, state or federal law. We provide training on anti-harassment policies.

Our commitment to a diverse and inclusive workplace is demonstrated by the following (as of April 2023):

LOGOLOGOLOGO
     LOGO                LOGO     

For more information, please go to the Responsibility section of our website: https://medicalpropertiestrust.com/corporate-responsibility/

 18    Proxy Statement and Notice of 2023 Annual Meeting


LOGO

Executive Summary

Our Unique Business Model

Medical Properties Trust is a global organization that acquires and develops healthcare facilities and leases the facilities to healthcare operating companies under long-term net leases. We are the first U.S. company of its kind to invest in hospitals globally with approximately $21 billion invested around the world on an adjusted basis(1), as of December 31, 2022. Our diversified geographic footprint spans ten countries and 31 states in the two years since our 2014 annual shareholder meeting, we contacted shareholders holding 67% and 50%U.S. We are at the forefront of our shares and met with 44% and 42%, respectively of those shareholders. Many of our meetingsindustry as the global leader in 2015 and 2016 included all three of our Compensation Committee members and none of our executive officers. We have also made additional improvements in reaction to evolving norms and best practices in compensation and governance.
This CD&A describes how our compensation plan design resulted in significantly reduced compensation for our Named Executive Officers (NEOs) in 2015, a year in which our shareholders suffered negative total shareholder return; it describes the many changes we have madehospital real estate finance, providing crucial financing to our compensationhospital operators, and governance plansunlocking significant value to fund critical growth in recent years;a vital industry. This sets us apart from most equity REITs, both in the healthcare and very importantly, reviewsbroader REIT sectors, and in order to successfully execute our strategy and effectively manage our complex operations, our executives require expertise both within the many componentsreal estate industry and the healthcare industry. Furthermore, our global operations add a unique layer of successcomplexity that we have achievedrequires specialized knowledge and understanding of distinct international markets to position your company for continued outperformance.
successfully execute transactions and operations around the world.

2022 Compensation Highlights

In 2015,2022, our executive compensation program continued to emphasize a pay-for-performance structure that rewards proved to be directlylong term and substantially linkedannual results consistent with our shareholders’ financial experience, with significantly reduced compensation matching our shareholder returns. business plan and strategy and is based on the following key principles:

Establish an appropriate level of target compensation for our NEOs that ensures the retention of our uniquely-qualified management team and is only adjusted periodically

Use incentives that are tied to rigorous performance goals that formulaically adjust payouts and realized compensation to reflect our performance results

Allocate the majority of compensation to equity-based awards to further emphasize alignment with our stockholders

We believe that when our shareholders consider this linkage, along withboth the continued other improvements in our compensation plan and the outstanding financial and operational successes we continue to create, they will vote FOR the advisory proposal regarding our executive compensation.
Our Pay for Performance Plan is Working
CEO Highlights Pay dropped 70% in 2015 . This reflects the tight alignment of our pay plans to shareholders’ returns (see page 19) No annual restricted stock awards for 2015 performance and eliminated the annual stock award plan in 2016 Reduced target total compensation opportunity for 2016 by approximately $2 million relative to 2015
77% of our CEO’s potential compensation in 2015 was tied directly to total shareholder return measures. Despite our record setting financial and operational performance in 2015, market and other conditions resulted in REITs in general and healthcare REITs (including us) in particular suffering negative shareholder returns for the year. As it has been designed over many years, this resulted in substantially lower compensation to our executives:
• CEO pay declined 70% in 2015.
• In addition, in response to shareholder feedback and our shareholder returns, the Compensation Committee used its discretion to award no annual restricted stock in 2016 for 2015 performance — this alone totaled a reduction in direct compensation for the CEO of $2.75 million as compared to 2014 direct compensation.
• We increased NEO base salaries in 2015 for the first time since 2012 to be in line with our peer group, but held them flat in 2016.
• 90% of each NEO’s annual cash bonus is tied to rigorous and objectively measured performance hurdles. Please see the table on page 22 for a description of the outstanding financial and operational performance during 2015.
15 Medical Properties Trust


LOGO

Compensation Discussion and Analysis MPT
Compensation Improvements We Have Made in 2015 and 2016 in Response to Shareholder Feedback:
Reduced the maximum multiple of base salary that the CEO is eligible to earn as annual cash incentive from 3.5 times to 2.0 times.
Streamlined the number of objective annual cash incentive measures from four to three, and designed each to be objectively measureable. Preserved the rigor of the measures and improved the description of each measure’s rationale and benefit to shareholders.
Eliminated the two-year carry forward provisions on the annual performance-based restricted stock awards granted in 2015 for 2014 performance.
The Compensation Committee eliminated altogether the annual share grant componentsuccess of our executive compensation program and our commitment to strong compensation governance was exhibited in 2022 as follows:

No Increase to Annual Target Pay

Significant Decline in Equity Value

Decrease in 2022 Cash Bonus Payouts

0%

For All NEOs Since 2020 and
No Increases for 2023

-$25 Million

-17%

During this period, our Say-on-Pay
Support Has Consistently Been
Above 92%
Reduction in our CEO’s “compensation actually paid” in
2022 as compared to the total amounts reported in our
Summary Compensation Table, driven by a significant
decline in the fair value of our CEO
s
outstanding equity awards
Year-over-year Reduction in
Cash Bonus for the CEO and
CFO (and 21% reduction for
the COO), demonstrating our
rigorous performance targets

In 2022, MPT continued to utilize the same compensation program that provided(i) has been strongly supported by our stockholders, and (ii) provides significant alignment between our NEOs’ compensation and our long-term and annual grants of restricted stock that were perceived to be duplicative of the 3-year long-term incentive plan grants of restricted stock.
The annual restricted stock awards have historically been grantedresults. These results are discussed in early January as compensation for the immediately prior year performance. The Compensation Committee awarded our executives no such awards in 2016 for 2015 performance resulting in a $2.75 million reduction in year-over-year paydetail throughout this “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” section for our CEO when measuredNEOs: Edward K. Aldag, Jr. – Chairman, President & Chief Executive Officer; R. Steven Hamner – Executive Vice President & Chief Financial Officer; and Emmett E. McLean – Executive Vice President, Chief Operating Officer & Secretary(2).

(1)

Refer to Appendix A for our definition of total adjusted gross assets and a reconciliation of total assets to total adjusted gross assets.

(2)

On February 16, 2023, Emmett E. McLean notified the Board of Directors of his intent to retire as Executive Vice President, Chief Operating Officer, and Secretary of the Company, effective September 1, 2023.

Proxy Statement and Notice of 2023 Annual Meeting    19 


Compensation Discussion and Analysis

2022 Performance Highlights

Even in 2022’s challenging global, economic and financial environments, we continued to execute our long-term and annual strategies that included selective and accretive investments in hospital real estate and steady earnings growth.

Financial Performance

Sustained outperformance building on strong financial performance in 2021 and positioning of our portfolio over the past several years, including the following achievements:

Value-Added Transactions

Steady Earnings Growth

over the Past Three Years

Sustainable Future

$1.1 Billion

new investments
closed in 2022
worldwide

$13 Billion new
investments closed since
the beginning of 2019

LOGO

17.6 Years

Weighted-Average
Lease and Loan Maturity

Double-digit year-over-year growth in net income of 37.6% in 2022, with an approximate 34% cumulative annual growth rate since the beginning of 2020

Steady growth in Normalized FFO(1) over the past three years, with an approximate 25% cumulative annual growth rate since the beginning of 2020

Continued to improve tenant diversification with no single property representing more than 3% of our overall portfolio

LOGO        LOGO

Steady dividend growth with 10 consecutive years of dividend increases that continued in 2022, with 3.6% year-over-year growth

Dividend per Share Growth

(3.8% CAGR since 2012)

LOGO

(1)

Refer to Appendix A for our definition of FFO and Normalized FFO and a reconciliation of net income to FFO and Normalized FFO.

(2)

Our largest tenant concentration was 19.8% as of December 31, 2022 on a total adjusted gross asset basis. Refer to Appendix A for our definition of total adjusted gross assets and a reconciliation of total assets to total adjusted gross assets.

(3)

As of December 31, 2022.

 20    Proxy Statement and Notice of 2023 Annual Meeting


Compensation Discussion and Analysis

Total Stockholder Return Performance

Our sustained payment of well-covered cash dividends has resulted in exceptional relative value to shareholders in the face of 2022’s global inflation and interest rate spikes

$4.32 billion in cumulative dividends paid since IPO

Cumulative TSR Growth Since-IPO

(Value of $100 invested on July 7, 2005)

LOGO

         As of December 31, 2022
 

 

   

 

   

 

  Since IPO TSR  10-Year TSR  5-Year TSR  1-Year TSR

Medical Properties Trust

  

 

  

 

  288%  77%  10%  -49%

Dow Jones U.S. Real Estate Health Care

  

 

  

 

  228%  32%  7%  -22%

S&P Global REIT

  

 

  

 

  138%  63%  10%  -24%

Proxy Statement and Notice of 2023 Annual Meeting    21 


Compensation Discussion and Analysis

Stockholder Engagement

Our stockholders have continuously and strongly approved our executive compensation plans. Over 92% of the shares present and entitled to vote at our 2022 annual meeting of stockholders were cast in favor of the 2022 Say-on-Pay proposal. Support for our Say-on-Pay proposal has exceeded 90% in each of the past seven years, with average support of nearly 95% over this period as compared 91% support for all REITs.

Proactive engagement and transparency. Our history of Say-on-Pay results is indicative of our stockholders’ support and approval of our executive compensation program. Our stockholders continue to affirm their positive support and feedback for our program and, accordingly, we maintained the core elements of our compensation program but continued to make enhancements to further improve our strong governance standards.

LOGO

We actively engage with our stockholders in person and telephonically to ensure that they are fully informed about our executive compensation policies. In the past three years, we have held discussions with stockholders representing the majority of our shares outstanding.

LOGO                 

Review:Review results from the annual meeting of stockholders to inform the framework of our annual compensation review process

Analyze:Monitor market trends and review compensation policy based on governance trends and stockholder feedback (e.g., benchmarking levels and structural considerations)

Engage:Engage with stockholders regarding the core structure and elements of our executive compensation

Implement:Implement and adjust compensation program based on feedback from stockholders and current market and governance standards

File:Publish annual proxy statement and prepare for annual meeting of stockholders

In 2022, the year earned rather thanfeedback on our executive compensation program from our stockholder engagement efforts was positive and resulted in consistently strong Say-on-Pay approval. Based on the year paid (which differs from the Summary Compensation Table presentation of executive pay).
Reduced the CEO’s target total compensation opportunity for 2016 by approximately $2 million relative to 2015 target total compensation through the restructuring of the long-term incentives going forward.
Similar reductions were made for the other NEOs.
Although we have discouraged our executives from pledging stock and our executives have not pledged any stock for at least the last five years, the Board of Directors has adopted a provision starting in 2016 that prohibits the pledgingoverwhelmingly positive support of our stock.
Our Boardprogram from our stockholders, we kept the overall structure of Directors appointed a new Compensation Committee Chairman in April 2016.
In 2016, the Compensation Committee engaged a new independent compensation consultant to replace the former consultant who had served that role for more than five years.
Compensation Improvements We Made and Steps We Took Prior to 2015:
Established executive stock ownership guidelines, including a minimum of 6 times base salary for the CEO.
Committed to maintain provisions in the compensation program that preclude post-retirement benefits, significant perquisites and executive retirement plans.
Added a two year holding period for stock vesting as partmagnitude of the Equity Incentive Plan.
Refined the peer group identification methodologiestarget compensation largely unchanged or decreased to result in peer companies closer in size and operating characteristics to those of the Company.
Reduced the discretionary portion of annual cash based incentive from 35% to 10%.
Implemented a clawback policy.
Increased the total shareholder return performance hurdle to 9.0% for earning of annual performance-based restricted stock awards.
Committed to avoidance of future employment agreements with multi-year evergreen, single trigger change in control and excise tax gross-up provisions.
There have been no such contracts since the three NEOs founded the Company in 2003.
Prohibited hedging activities by our NEOs.
Proxy Statement and Notice of 2016 Annual Meeting 16


LOGO

Compensation Discussion and Analysis
2015 Financial and Operational Successes:
While 2015 was disappointing when measured solely by temporary market conditions impacting our (and almost all other REITs’) stock prices — and our executive officers suffered for that alongfurther strengthen alignment with our shareholders,stockholders as further described below in our executives continued to executeEvolution of our Compensation Program”.

 22    Proxy Statement and Notice of 2023 Annual Meeting


Compensation Discussion and Analysis

Evolution of Our Compensation Program and Governance. We have made consistent progress in developing a compensation program that is aligned with best market and governance practices. The importance of stockholder engagement is evidenced by the long-term strategic initiatives thatmeaningful enhancements we have been long established. We believe 2015 total shareholder return results were a timing difference and we fully expect that our shareholders will benefit from the resulting successesmade over the foreseeable future; some of these successes in 2015 include:
Record profits, cash flows and normalized funds from operations (FFO) in 2015.
18.9% year-over-year increase in normalized FFO per share.
51% growth in normalized FFO.
41% growth in revenue in 2015, from $313 million to $442 million.
5% increase in our annual cash dividend, now $0.88 a share.
Maintaining an investment grade debt rating from Standard & Poors.
Continued highly and immediately accretive asset growth of 51%, including completion of the highly attractive and accretive 32 hospitals, €700 million Median portfolio in Germany and the intensely competitive 7 hospital, $900 million Capella transaction among others.
Since year-end 2015 reduced revolver balances by approximately $500 million and executed further deleveraging transactions that are expected to further reduce total debt by approximately $600 million when closed during the second quarter of 2016.
Continued to improve tenant concentration metrics to the lowest in company history with no single facility representing more than 2% of total assets.
Improved the dividend payout ratio to the lowest in company history and among the best in the healthcare REIT sector at below 70%.
17 Medical Properties Trust

years:


Compensation and Governance Evolution

2018 and Prior

LOGO

  Streamlined annual cash incentive measures and clarified rationale for metrics

  Adopted anti-hedging and anti-pledging policies for NEOs, directors and employees

  Implemented a clawback policy that applies to both cash and equity compensation

  Established executive stock ownership guidelines, including a minimum of 6x base salary for the CEO

  Committed to eliminate multi-year evergreen, single-trigger change of control and excise tax gross-up provisions from future employment agreements (no such provisions have been included in Company contracts since 2003)

2019

LOGO

  Modified performance-based equity awards to include both operational performance metrics that drive long-term stockholder value creation and TSR metrics

  Reduced the discretionary portion of annual cash incentives from 35% to 20%

  Established an employee-led Green Team

  Implemented Company-wide environmental initiatives and engaged in active dialogue with our tenants and developers on ESG-related matters

2020

LOGO

  Increased the performance-based equity portion to represent two-thirds of the target long-term incentive value

  Incorporated an absolute TSR modifier (in addition to the existing relative TSR modifier) to ensure that our executives would not be significantly rewarded during periods of low or no growth (payouts reduced up to 25% if TSR is below 3% per annum)

  Refined our executive compensation peer group to include only the most comparable REITs using a transparent selection methodology

  Added ESG performance to the annual cash bonus program consistent with our commitment to ESG initiatives

  Diversified our Board with one additional female director who is also Latina and a native of Costa Rica

2021 - 2023

LOGO

  Continued to achieve market leading Say-on-Pay support, including 92.3% in 2022 as compared to 88.7% for all other REITs

  Established two new standing Board committees including an Environmental and Social Committee and a Risk Committee

  Demonstrated our commitment to Board refreshment and diversity with the addition of one additional female director (female directors now represent 33% of the Board, up from 25%)

  No increases to target compensation for any of our NEOs despite the significant increase in our size and the complexity of our business

  Streamlined CD&A disclosure to enhance pay transparency

  Enhanced disclosure on how we determine equity awards and the Compensation Committee’s assessment of the discretionary portion of the bonus program

LOGO

Compensation Discussion and Analysis MPT
2015 Chief Executive Officer Pay Mix — Total Direct Compensation
Pay mix is based on total direct compensation, which includes base salary, annual cash incentive, approved value of annual restricted stock awards (granted in 2016 based on 2015 performances which equaled $0) and the grant date fair value of the long-term restricted stock awards based upon the probable outcome of the performance-based vesting conditions as calculated by an independent appraiser.
LTIP Plan (34%)
Base Salary (23%)
Performance-Based Compensation (77%)
Annual Cash Incentive (43%)
Proxy Statement and Notice of 2016 Annual Meeting 18

Proxy Statement and Notice of 2023 Annual Meeting    23 


Compensation Discussion and Analysis

LOGO

Compensation Discussion and Analysis
Pay for Performance Alignment
Summary Compensation Table amounts reflect the accounting value of compensation, but we believe that more important than accounting is the actual value earned in a given year for each executive.
We have demonstrated a strong correlation between shareholder returns and executive compensation. Our executive’s compensation is highly variable and dependent on both relative and absolute TSR.
In 2015, our CEO was eligible to earn up to $4.73 million in performance-based equity, all of which was unearned based on the Company’s 1-year and 3-year TSR performance.
We believe this strong correlation between earned compensation and shareholder value is essential in promoting long-term growth while having shoulder-to-shoulder alignment with shareholders’ interest.
$10
80%
$9.35M
$8.38M
70.8% 3YR TSR (2011-2014)
$8
60%
$6
39.8% 3YR TSR (2010-2013)
40%
$4
$2.76M
20%
$2
16.8% 3YR TSR (2012-2015)
$-
0%
2013
2014
2015
Base Salary
Annual Cash Incentive
Annual Time-Based Stock Award
Annual Performance-Based Restricted Stock Award
LTIP Plan
Total Compensation ($ Millions)
Three-Year Total Shareholder Return
Name and Position
Edward K. Aldag, Jr.
Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President
Steven Hamner
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Emmett E. McLean
Executive Vice President,
Chief Operating Officer,
Treasurer and Secretary
Year
2015
2014
2013
2015
2014
2013
2015
2014
2013
Salary
($)
950,000
600,000
600,000
575,000
400,000
400,000
525,000
395,000
395,000
Annual Cash Incentive
($)
1,805,000
1,857,000
1,817,250
805,000
878,500
860,250
735,000
867,519
849,497
Annual Time-Based Restricted Stock Award
($)
-
1,375,000
1,475,000
-
625,000
675,000
-
440,000
475,000
Annual Performance-Based Restricted Stock Award
($)
-
1,670,122
1,425,732
-
768,497
669,383
-
532,804
446,250
LTIP Plan
($)
-
3,850,000
3,057,456
-
2,100,000
1,651,024
-
1,750,000
1,406,433
Total Earned Compensation
($)
2,755,000
9,352,122
8,375,438
1,380,000
4,771,997
4,255,657
1,260,000
3,985,323
3,572,180
Salary represents amounts earned and paid in the year; while annual cash incentive represents amounts earned for that year although paid in the following year.
Annual Time-Based Restricted Stock: Reflects the value approved by the Compensation Committee after reviewing the respective years performance and is granted in following fiscal year. For example, the 2014 Time-Based Restricted Stock value reflects the value the Compensation Committee approved in December 2014 after reviewing annual performance and granted in January 2015.
Annual Performance-Based Restricted Stock: Reflects the value of the stock earned for the Company’s 1-year TSR performance at the stock price on the date it was earned. 2015 value reflects $0 as no performance stock was earned.
3-Year Long-Term Incentive Performance Plan: Reflects the value earned based on the 3-year TSR performance period ended at the end of the fiscal year. For example, 2014 amount includes the actual value earned under the 2012 LTIP Plan at the stock price on the date it was earned. 2015 value excludes all stock under the 2013 LTIP Plan as all stock was forfeited based on performance over the three-year performance period.
19 Medical Properties Trust


LOGO

Compensation Discussion and Analysis MPT
Compensation Philosophy, Design, and Process
Virtually every company says it uses pay to drive and reward performance. We do as well. But doing this for a public company in a broad, ever-changing sector whose shares are held by individuals and institutions with diverse time horizons and risk tolerances, requires us to balance many considerations.
We place significant value on tying

Our executive compensation to shareholders’ long-term returns. However, because we can neither wait for the long-term to arrive before compensating our people, nor incentivize a swing-for-the-fences strategy, we value stable base salaries that also play recruiting and retention roles.
We value the clarity of formulas that tie compensation to shareholder returns in the long term. However, because shareholder returns are affected by factors beyond management’s control, we also use pay elements tied to individual and business achievements. Through 2015, our annual cash and equity-based bonuses helped play this role. Starting in 2016, with the elimination of our annual equity plan, we will rely soley on our annual cash plan to play this role.
We understand that our shareholders value the simplicity of a single form of equity-based pay. So, starting in 2016, with the elimination of our annual equity plan, we will rely solely on our long-term equity plan to align our executives’ interests with those of our shareholders.
Finally, we balance an interest in compensating success only after a project is completed or a strategy is implemented with a need to deter over-focusing on shorter-term projects and strategies with shorter-term payouts.
We implement this philosophy and these considerations with pay objectives that:
Combine a mixture of short, medium, and long-term plans; some market-focused, some individually focused; some cash-based, some equity-based; to capture all the variables described above.
Put 77% of NEOs’ total annual compensation in 2015 at-risk via stock price, corporate, or individual performance measurements.
Use performance metrics to determine 90% of annual cash incentive awards. In 2015, the Compensation Committee awarded only one-half of the remaining 10%.
Encourage our executives and directors to acquire and maintain significant equity ownership in our Company.
Our CEO must acquire and hold Company equity valued at six-times base salary or more, our other NEOs (our CFO and COO) must hold four or more times base salary, and our non-employee directors must hold at least three-times their annual retainer. Our NEOs greatly exceed these requirements.
Prohibit actions that would de-link compensation from our philosophy and goals:
Our claw back policy avoids rewarding bad conduct.
We do not issue or reprice options.
We do not provide perquisites except for standard car, financial planning and insurance benefits.
We have robust anti-hedging and pledging policies.
We use rigorous, relevant, disclosed measurement goals that incentivize above-median performance without creating unacceptable risk.
Rely on the expertise of independent outside compensation consultants.
Task and empower our Compensation Committee to:
Review and approve corporate goals and objectives relative to the compensation of the executive officers, evaluate the performance of the executive officers, and determine and approve appropriate compensation levels based on these objectives;
Review and approve, on an annual basis, the corporate incentive goals and metrics relevant to the cash bonus pay and performance-based equity awards;
Evaluate the competitiveness of each executive’s compensation package in relation to other possible compensation offers the executive may receive;
Approve changes to executives’ total compensation package including base salary, cash bonus payout amounts and long-term equity incentive awards.
Proxy Statement and Notice of 2016 Annual Meeting 20


LOGO

Compensation Discussion and Analysis
Elements of Pay
Base Pay
Historically the Compensation Committee reviews salaries triennially. Consistent with this, we increased NEO base salaries in 2012 and then not again until 2015. Base salaries were increased in 2015 to be more in line with our peer group. None of our NEOs received a base salary increase in 2016. Base salary on average does not account for more than 20% of NEO total target compensation.
Our approach to base pay is to provide a fixed amount to promote recruitment and retention, reflect individual experience, performance, internal pay equity and peer-group comparisons.
Annual Cash Bonus Plan
In 2015, all executive officers were eligible for an annual incentive cash bonus subject to achieving specified performance goals.
We used the annual cash bonus plan to incentivize achievement of our annual strategic financial goals. Ninety percent of these goals’ performance criteria are linked to objective performance hurdles. The remaining 10% is linked to NEO’s individual performance.
In 2015, we reduced the number of payout levels of the annual cash bonus from four to three, and from six in 2013: each annual cash bonus is now based on Threshold, Target and Maximum percentages of base salary. In addition, in 2015, we adjusted the base salaries and maximum bonus NEOs may receive under this plan to be more in line with our peer group which resulted in a reduction in our CEO’s maximum bonus percentage to 200% from 350%.
21 Medical Properties Trust


LOGO

Compensation Discussion and Analysis MPT
We spend considerable time designing the NEOs’ annual cash bonuses to align payment with the achievement of key Company strategic financial goals important to sustainable shareholder returns:
Performance Metric Weighting Threshold Target Maximum 2015 Results
Normalized FFO Per Share Growth
Encourages focus on profitability as measured by the most frequently used assessed REIT earnings measure; to mitigate against the risk of non-profitable or other low quality growth. 36% 8% 10% 15% 18.9% Beat maximum target by 90%
We increased our assets by $800 million, or 28% in 2014, an extraordinary achievement that we thought unlikely again in 2015. Accordingly, when establishing a Target for 2015 normalized FFO per share increase, we believed 10% would be an aggressive target and would require, all other things equal, a difficult goal of approximately $600 million of average acquisitions - in other words, the $600 million would result in about a 10% normalized FFO per share increase only if such acquisitions were made very early in 2015. Primarily because we successfully competed for the $900 million Capella transaction that closed in late August, we exceeded the Target and achieved Maximum. It should be noted that the Capella opportunity was not even in our pipeline (we were not aware of it) until after our cash bonus metrics were established.
Exposure by Tenant
Ensures focus on reducing the risk that long- and short-term results are overly dependent on any single tenant; also incentivizes management to continue to develop the hospital sale/leaseback market and identify additional acquisition opportunities. 18% 25% 24% 23% 17.6% Beat maximum target by 27%
Based on our assets at year-end 2014 and signed but not closed acquisitions, our expected Exposure to One Tenant metric was 27%. In addition, we expected to add additional investments to this tenant relationship in 2015 (and we did). Accordingly, we established a high Target level of 24%, which required us to add at least $400 million of acquisitions not related to our largest tenant. Because we successfully identified Capella as a potential completely new relationship and we won a very competitive competition for Capella’s acquisition, we were able to reduce our Exposure to One Tenant to only 17.6%. To achieve this level of success, we would have had to establish a goal of adding nearly $2.0 billion of accretive assets in 2015.
Additional Acquisitions
Motivates management to execute on our long-term strategic growth plan; for management to be rewarded for this target, the acquisitions must be profitable and accretive on a per share basis in order to also meet the FFO Growth and AFFO Payout Targets 36% $400 Million $600 Million $800 Million $1.6B Beat maximum target by 100%
In 2014 we had grown our assets by 28%, and extremely challenging process that we believed was highly unlikely to repeat. Based on our pipeline of known opportunities in early 2015, and the difficulty we knew existed in achieving any level of double digit asset growth, we established a growth Target of 16%, equivalent to about $600 million in new assets in 2015. Once again, the unexpected and unknowable (in early 2015) Capella opportunity, which we successfully closed in the face of intense competition from other investors, drove our asset acquisitions to $1.6 billion, increasing our assets by a phenomenal 43%, even after the prior year’s growth of 28%.
Qualitative Performance Review
Represents indicators of the executive’s success in fulfilling his or her responsibilities to the Company and in executing its strategic business plan. 10% N/A N/A N/A N/A
Even though our executives led our company to outstanding levels of outperformance of financial and operational goals, the Committee members recommended, and our executives agreed, to reduce the Discretionary component to zero in light of our shareholders’ negative total return.
2014 Bonus 2015 Bonus % Change
Edward K. Aldag, Jr. $1,857,000 $1,805,000 -3%
R. Steven Hamner $878,500 $805,000 -8%
Emmett E. McLean $867,519 $735,000 -15%
Proxy Statement and Notice of 2016 Annual Meeting 22


LOGO

Compensation Discussion and Analysis
Results of Our 2015 Annual Cash-Bonus Plan
In 2015, our growth in revenue (79th percentile), normalized FFO/share (92nd percentile) and annual dividends declared (67th percentile) have all been well above median on both an annual and cumulative basis as compared to the constituents of the SNL US REIT Healthcare Index.[1]
In addition, our management achieved another important goal: a reduction in our exposure to our largest tenant, from 19% in 2014 to 17.6% in 2015, which, on a 3-year basis adds up to a 22% decrease in exposure to a single tenant. Moreover, we achieved this important goal even though two of our tenants merged in 2015, temporarily driving our exposure to almost 27% before we reduced it to 17.6%.
These achievements, and the others noted on the summary page of this CD&A warranted our paying out slightly less than the maximum award: approximately 95% of maximum.
Growth in Revenue
79th Percentile
Growth in Normalized FFO/share
92nd Percentile
Annual Equity Awards
In 2015 and prior years the Company had an annual equity award plan, in which the Compensation Committee would make annual grants of time-based and performance-based restricted stock with the amount of stock awarded based on a discretionary evaluation of prior year performance. As a result, the awards made in early 2015 were made based on an evaluation of 2014 performance, as discussed in last year’s CD&A. As required under SEC disclosure requirements, those grants are disclosed in this year’s Summary Compensation Table although they are intended to reflect 2014 performance.
Based on shareholder feedback, the Compensation Committee decided to discontinue the Annual Equity Award program and determined only to award long-term performance-based and time-based equity with a focus on future performance and retention. In addition, as part of this restructuring and taking our recent shareholder returns and say on pay results into account, the Committee determined not to award any annual equity awards in 2016 for 2015 performance. This resulted in a substantial decrease in year over year pay for our NEOs when measured on a consistent basis, with these annual awards shown in the year earned rather than the year paid. We believe this substantially responds to shareholder feedback and our results for 2015, although these results are not reflected in the Summary Compensation Table due to lag in disclosure for the annual equity awards.
Although our annual equity plan had important roles to play in our prior plans, we have, effective in 2016, simplified our equity award arrangements and eliminated this element. The following chart provides a comparison of the approved values of the 2014 and 2015 annual equity awards. This provides a graphic capturing of the strong alignment between our administration of our pay plans and our shareholders’ experience: the approved value of our CEO’s annual equity-based award dropped 100 percent with similar declines for the other NEOs.
2014 Annual Equity Award 2015 Annual Equity Award Percent Change
Edward K. Aldag, Jr. $2,750,000 - -100%
R. Steven Hamner $1,250,000 - -100%
Emmett E. McLean $880,000 - -100%
[1] Adjusted to exclude companies that: (i) had an IPO in 2015; and (ii) declared bankruptcy. These companies include: (i) Care Capital Properties, Inc.; (ii) Global Healthcare REIT, Inc.; and (iii) Community Healthcare Trust, Inc.
23 Medical Properties Trust


LOGO

Compensation Discussion and Analysis
MPT
2015 Three-Year, Long-Term Incentive Performance Plan (LTIP)
Our 2015 three-year, long-term incentive performance plan, which is provided through performance-based restricted stock, is designed to align NEO interestsattract and retain high caliber executives capable of managing our unique business model with ongoing, sustainable, long-term performance. Performance is based on our total shareholder return (TSR) over a three-year period.
Key features include:
• Halfexpertise in real estate, healthcare, international and financing operations. Our program was designed to motivate and reward executives for successful execution of our LTIP plan usesbusiness strategy that is tied to rigorous absolute TSR hurdles.performance goals. In recent years, we have made several enhancements but maintained these core elements of our program. The other half uses relative TSR hurdles. Eacheffectiveness of our executive compensation program is a rigorous measurement of shareholder value created over the three-year performance period.
• Our stock must attain more than a 27% TSR over the three-year performance period in order for any shares to be earned under the absolute portion of the plan. Participants earn 50% of the total award (which is the target number of shares) with a 31% three-year TSR return. They earn the full award with a 35% three-year TSR.
• Our stock must produce a TSR higher than the MSCI US REIT index over the three-year performance period in order for any shares to be earned under the relative portion of the plan. Participants earn 50% of the total award (which is the target number of shares) ifillustrated by our TSR is more than 3% above this index for the performance period. They earn the full award if our TSR is more than 6% above this index for the performance period. Wesignificant achievements, including:

Accretive new investments of over $13 billion since the beginning of 2019

Net income of $902.6 million, representing 37.6% year-over-year growth in 2022

10 consecutive years of dividend growth per share

Additionally, we believe that our current executive compensation program represents a balanced and strategically aligned pay-for-performance program as demonstrated by the relative award performance goals are exceptionally rigorous and, in fact, the most rigorous in our peer group.
• Any shares earned under the LTIP plan at the end of three-year performance period are subject to two additional years of time-based vesting. Participants in the 2015 LTIP plan must be employed on December 31, 2019 to be eligible for full payout, subject to vesting upon certain qualifying terminations of employment.
• The LTIP award made to our CEO in January 2013, which had 275,000 target number of shares, was forfeited as of December 31, 2015 because we did not meet the challenging minimum absolute or relative TSR thresholds.
• The maximum number of shares subject to each LTIP award is determined at the date of grant on the basis of a fixed notional maximum value of each award.
For 2015 Mr. Aldag was granted 252,525 notional LTIP Units (nLTIPUs) with a maximum grant date value of $3,520,199. Mr. Hamner was granted 144,300 nLTIPUs with a maximum grant date value of $2,011,542. And Mr. McLean was granted 108,225 nLTIPUs with a maximum grant date value of $1,508,657.
For 2015 the measurement period for the LTIP plan is January 1, 2015, through December 31, 2017. The number of LTIP units earned if performance is above the minimum thresholds but below the maximum thresholds is determined based on linear interpolation between the percentages earned at the minimum and maximum thresholds.
Proxy Statement and Notice of 2016 Annual Meeting 24

following:


LOGO

LOGO

Approximately 66% of our CEO’s compensation is variable and at-risk, tied directly to the achievement of operational and financial performance, because we value the clarity of formulas that tie compensation to stockholder returns in the long-term.

The variable components of our compensation program specifically include rigorous performance goals meant to motivate management to execute our business plan tied to accretive growth, strategic financing and raising efficient capital. In our long-term program, our 2022 goals required meaningful growth in terms of FFO per share, EBITDA and acquisitions while also decreasing compensation based on the relative and absolute TSR performance in 2022.

The majority of our equity awards (approximately two-thirds for all NEOs) are at-risk performance-based stock awards earned based on the achievement of operational goals and subject to adjustment based on both absolute and relative TSR, with the remainder in the form of time-based stock awards that are subject to the same stock price fluctuations as our stockholders. This approach reflects our understanding that our investors value equity-based compensation to align our executives’ interests with those of our stockholders. In 2022, because of the one-year TSR performance that negatively impacted our stockholders, our NEOs’ compensation was also adjusted negatively.

Less than 10% of our CEO’s compensation is fixed in the form of base salary, which plays a recruiting and retention role, because we can neither wait for the long-term to arrive before compensating our people nor incentivize a risky swing-for-the-fences strategy.

 24    Proxy Statement and Notice of 2023 Annual Meeting


Compensation Discussion and Analysis

Our Executive Compensation Discussion and Analysis
Compensation Review Process

Compensation Committee

Compensation Consultant

Management

Provides independent oversight and approval with respect to executive compensation matters

Provides guidance to the Compensation Committee throughout the year on compensation matters, including benchmarking for pay levels, pay practices and governance trends

Provide additional information as requested by the Compensation Committee

Assesses corporate and individual performance as it relates to actual compensation for our NEOs

Assists with peer group selection and analysis

CEO provides input on individual performance for other NEOs and achievements relating to strategic non-financial business goals

Administers our equity incentive programs, including reviewing and approving equity grants to our NEOs

Reviews and advises on recommendations, plan design and measures

Role of the Compensation Committee

Pursuant to its charter, the Compensation Committee is responsible for designing our executive compensation plans,program, establishing compensation levels, and measuring the performance of our NEOs. The Compensation Committee, which consists of three independent directors, is responsible for the design, review, and approval of all aspects of our executive compensation program. Among other duties, the Compensation Committee is responsible for the following:
• Reviewing and approving, on an annual basis, the corporate incentive goals and objectives relevant to the annual cash bonus plan and performance-based equity awards;
• Evaluating the performance of our executive officers in light of these goals and objectives;
• Evaluating the competitiveness of each executive officer’s total compensation package relative to what other publicly traded and private equity-backed real estate investors may offer; and
• Approving any changes to our executives’ total compensation package, including, but not limited to, base salary, annual and long-term incentive award opportunities and payouts, and retention programs.

Reviewing and approving, on an annual basis, the corporate incentive goals and objectives relevant to the annual cash bonus plan and performance-based shares

Evaluating the performance of our executive officers in light of these goals and objectives

Evaluating the competitiveness of each executive officer’s total compensation package relative to what other publicly traded and private equity-backed real estate investors may offer

Approving any changes to each of our executive’s total compensation package, including, but not limited to, base salary, annual and long-term incentive award opportunities and payouts, and retention programs

In order to assist the Compensation Committee to design, establishin designing, establishing and monitormonitoring our executive compensation plans, the Compensation Committee has engaged an independent executive compensation consultant, as described below.

Role of the Compensation Consultant
In 2015,

The Compensation Committee recognizes that it is essential to receive objective advice from its outside compensation consultant and, in 2022, the Compensation Committee retained FTI Consulting, Inc.,Gressle & McGinley, LLC, a nationally recognized compensation consulting firm specializing in the real estate industry (the “Compensation Consultant” or “FTI Consulting”“Gressle & McGinley”). The Compensation Consultant was engaged by and reports directly to the Compensation Committee. Upon the request of the Compensation Committee, a representative of FTI Consulting attendsGressle & McGinley attended meetings of the Compensation Committee and communicatescommunicated with the Chairman of the Compensation Committee between meetings; however, the Compensation Committee makes all decisions regarding the compensation of our executive officers.

The Compensation Consultant provides various executive compensation services to the Compensation Committee pursuant to a written consulting agreement between the Compensation Committee and the Compensation Consultant.Committee. Generally, these services include, among others, (i) advising the Compensation Committee on the principal aspects of our executive compensation program and director compensation program and evolving industry practices; (ii) presenting information to assist the Compensation Committee in determining the appropriate peer group to be used to evaluate the competitiveness of our compensation program; (iii) providing market information and analysis regarding the competitiveness of our program design and our award values in relationship to our performance; and (iv) preparing recommendations based on the Company’s performance, current market trends and corporate governance matters. The Compensation Committee recognizes that it is essential to receive objective advice from its outside compensation consultant.developments. The Compensation Committee has determined, based on a review of relevant factors, that

Proxy Statement and Notice of 2023 Annual Meeting    25 


Compensation Discussion and Analysis

Gressle & McGinley is independent and that FTI Consulting advice is objective and free from the influencetheir work has not raised any conflict of management.interests. The Compensation Committee also closely examines the safeguards and steps that FTI ConsultingGressle & McGinley takes to ensure that its executive compensation consulting services are objective. The Compensation Committee takes the following factors into consideration:
• The Compensation Committee directly hired and has the authority to terminate FTI Consulting engagement for executive compensation related services.
• The Compensation Committee solely determined the terms and conditions of FTI Consulting’s engagement for compensation related services, including the fees charged.
25 Medical Properties Trust


LOGO

Compensation Discussion and Analysis
• FTI Consulting is engaged by and reports directly toOther than advising the Compensation Committee for allas described above, Gressle & McGinley did not provide any other services to the Company in 2022.

Role of the Chief Executive Officer

Although executive compensation services.
• FTI Consulting has direct access to members ofdeterminations are ultimately made by the Compensation Committee, duringthe CEO provides additional information to assist the Committee in evaluating and between meetings.
During 2015, we paid FTI Consulting $215,562 in consulting fees directly related to executive, Board and other compensation-related services performed for the Compensation Committee.
To bring additional perspective to our continually evolving and improving compensation plans, in 2016 the Compensation Committee retained Semler Brossy as its new independent advisor.
Say-On-Pay Results
At our 2015 annual meeting, 52.6% of shares cast were voted in favor of our Say-on-Pay vote, an increase from our 2014 annual meeting when only 50.6% of shares cast were voted in favor of our Say-on-Pay vote. In the two years since our 2014 annual shareholder meeting, we have contacted shareholders holding 67% and 50% of our shares and met with 44% and 42%, respectively of those shareholders. The great majority of our meetings in 2015 and 2016 included all three of our Compensation Committee members and none of our executive officers. As a direct result of our meetings and conversations with our shareholders we have we have made improvements to ourdetermining executive compensation plans and provides input on each executive officer’s performance, other important governance practices.
Proxy Statement and Noticethan his own.

Use of 2016 Annual Meeting 26

Peer Group Data


LOGO

Compensation Discussion and Analysis
Peer Groups
In additionWe use peer group data to its roles in aligning executives’ interests with achieving our strategic goals and providing returns to shareholders, we use compensation to promote important recruiting, promotion and retention goals. To help us further these goals we compare each element ofensure that our compensation program remains both appropriate and competitive in relation to a carefully assembled peer group from whose membersthose companies with whom we most directly compete for talent and business opportunities, among other things, but dothings. Constructing an appropriate peer group requires various considerations as no single company or industry fully captures the scope of our operations. In particular, the complexities faced by our Company as a result of our global operations and the expertise required of our executives given our specialized assets presents a unique challenge in developing an appropriate peer group.

Beginning in 2020, we refined our peer group identification methodology to include only REITs, with a focus on strategic peers that better reflect the uniqueness of our business, growth initiatives and global operations. On an annual basis, we review our peer group to ensure the overall composition reflects an appropriate competitor set. Accordingly, we reviewed our peer group based on the following criteria:

Continuity: Sensitivity to peer group continuity to ensure that peer group results are comparable year-over-year and are not arbitrarily adjusted for short-term changes in peer dynamics

Size: REITs within an appropriate size range relative to our Company, in terms of total capitalization and ensuring the Company is at the approximate median or above the overall peer set. For 2022, the size range was slightly expanded to account for significant market volatility in the REIT sector and ranged from 0.3x to 3.0x (as compared to 0.4x to 2.5x in 2021). No new companies were added as a result of this change, but it allowed for peer group continuity

Global: Companies with a global presence that reflect the same complexities faced by our global operations and challenges associated with operating on an international scale

Healthcare Expertise: REITs that primarily invest in medical properties and/or healthcare assets whose executives require expertise in the healthcare/medical sector

Specialized REITs: REITs with specialized assets that require executives to have knowledge of the underlying assets

Net Lease REITs: REITs with a significant portion of properties leased on a triple-net basis

During 2022, the Compensation Committee utilized peer group compensation data to understand the Company’s pay levels and structure as compared to the market. Although the Compensation Committee does not aimadhere to meet a particularspecific formula nor does it target a certain percentile of compensation, we believe it is important to understand the competitive landscape to effectively assess each NEO’s total compensation opportunity, pay mix and overall governance and market trends. We strive to ensure that our compensation program and opportunities remain equitable and competitive, while also considering factors such as size, scope of operations and our relative performance, as appropriate.

 26    Proxy Statement and Notice of 2023 Annual Meeting


Compensation Discussion and Analysis

2022 Executive Compensation Peer Group

The approved peer group for 2022 includes the following companies (ranked by total capitalization) with MPT slightly above median of the peer group. In 2015,group based on total capitalization:

CompanyTotal
Capitalization
(1)
Industry    Size      Global  Healthcare
Expertise
Specialized
REIT
Net Lease
REIT

Welltower Inc.

$47,373

Health Care REIT

SBA Communications Corporation (REIT)

$46,466

Specialty REIT

Alexandria Real Estate Equities, Inc.

$38,477

Office REIT

Ventas, Inc.

$30,746

Health Care REIT

Boston Properties, Inc.

$27,669

Office REIT

Iron Mountain Incorporated

$27,577

Specialty REIT

Healthpeak Properties, Inc.

$20,910

Health Care REIT

Gaming and Leisure Properties, Inc.

$20,160

Casino REIT

    Medical Properties Trust, Inc.

$16,139

Health Care REIT

Vornado Realty Trust

$15,004

Office REIT

Healthcare Realty Trust Incorporated(2)

$13,245

Health Care REIT

Omega Healthcare Investors, Inc.

$12,028

Health Care REIT

SL Green Realty Corp.

$9,282

Office REIT

Kilroy Realty Corporation

$8,944

Office REIT

Douglas Emmett, Inc.

$8,441

Office REIT

Hudson Pacific Properties, Inc.

$7,244

Office REIT

��

JBG SMITH Properties

$4,882

Diversified REIT

(1)

All financial data in $ millions per S&P Capital IQ Pro as of December 31, 2022.

(2)

Based on the selection criteria above, Healthcare Trust of America, Inc. was removed and replaced with Healthcare Realty Trust Incorporated (the post-Merger entity).

Proxy Statement and Notice of 2023 Annual Meeting    27 


Compensation Discussion and Analysis

Compensation Program Features

The following chart provides an overview of the components of our 2022 executive compensation consultant recommended,program, including the objective of each component and how it ties to our overall compensation philosophy, which can be summarized in the following key categories:

LOGO

Retention

LOGO

Provide Competitive Pay Opportunities

LOGO

Motivate Execution of Business Strategy

LOGO

Balance Short-Term and Long-Term Performance

LOGOAlignment with StockholdersLOGODrive Performance Through Rigorous Performance Goals

ElementDescriptionObjectivePay Philosophy
Element
Base SalaryBased on duties, experience and internal pay equityProvides a fixed level of cash compensation to attract and retain talented executivesLOGO    LOGO
Annual
Cash Bonus
50% Normalized FFO per Share

Aligns our executives with near-term financial goals and strategic priorities, which for 2022 included Normalized FFO growth and managing leverage

LOGO    LOGO

LOGO    LOGO    LOGO

20% EBITDA/Interest Expense
10% ESG Initiatives

For 2022 as we remain focused on the importance of ESG for both internal and external stakeholders, we continued to include the achievement of ESG initiatives in our annual cash bonus program as standalone assessment criteria

20% Qualitative PerformanceGiven that the majority of our compensation is based on pre-established metrics and goals, allows for a subjective assessment of performance on a more holistic basis and considers factors that may not be quantifiable

Time-Based Shares

Vest ratably over 3 yearsPromotes retention and aligns executives with stockholdersLOGO    LOGO    LOGO
Performance-Based Shares

30% FFO per Share Growth

Rewards executives for meaningful FFO per share growth in both the short- and long-term. Achievement of these goals requires significant accretive growth on an annual and cumulative basis


LOGO    LOGO

LOGO    LOGO    LOGO

40% EBITDA

Ensures that executives are focused on profitability and stockholder value creation through EBITDA growth in both the short-term and long-term periods

30% Acquisitions

Motivates our executives to execute our growth strategy that involves making accretive acquisitions to achieve portfolio growth that would not be achieved through a simpler organic growth model focused only on leasing spreads

Absolute and Relative

TSR Modifier

Adjusts payouts to align with long-term stockholder returns on both an absolute and relative basis

LOGO

 28    Proxy Statement and Notice of 2023 Annual Meeting


Compensation Discussion and Analysis

Elements of Pay

Base Pay

Base pay represents fixed cash compensation intended to attract and retain talent and is generally determined based on a review of individual experience, performance, internal pay equity considerations and peer group base pay levels. Although base pay levels are only adjusted periodically, the Compensation Committee reviews levels annually.

The following chart sets forth 2022 base salaries for our NEOs, which remained unchanged from 2021 amounts.

Named Executive Officer

2022 Base Salary

($)

Edward K. Aldag, Jr.

1,000,000

R. Steven Hamner

   675,000

Emmett E. McLean

   550,000

Most Recent Action by the Compensation Committee

No 2023 salary increases were provided to our NEOs based on the Compensation Committee’s review at year-end 2022. Our CEO and COO’s salary have not been increased since 2018 and our CFO’s salary has not been increased since 2020.

Annual Cash Bonus Plan

Annual Cash Bonus Opportunities

For 2022, cash bonus opportunities for our NEOs as a percent of base salary were as follows:

Named Executive Officer

  Threshold    Target    Maximum  

 

Edward K. Aldag, Jr.

    100%       200%       300%    

 

 

 

 

 

R. Steven Hamner

    100%       150%       225%    

 

 

 

 

 

Emmett E. McLean

    50%       100%       175%    

 

 

 

 

 

Most Recent Action by the Compensation Committee

We make periodic adjustments to target bonus opportunities, which were last adjusted in 2020 in an effort to bring more balance to our compensation pay mix with minimal increases to base salaries. For 2023, annual cash bonus opportunities will continue to remain unchanged for the CEO and CFO. For our COO, Mr. McLean, the maximum payout decreased to 125% (from 175%).

Annual Cash Bonus Plan Metrics

The cash bonus plan metrics are reviewed annually by the Compensation Committee to ensure continued alignment with our strategic goals for the upcoming year. These goals are critical to our long-term success and are designed to be challenging and rigorous to ensure that we remain focused on differentiated growth and our overall business strategy.

Proxy Statement and Notice of 2023 Annual Meeting    29 


Compensation Discussion and Analysis

The 2022 cash bonus plan metrics are set forth in the following chart:

Performance Metric

 Weighting  Threshold  Target  Maximum     2022 Achievement   

 

Normalized FFO Per Share

Encourages focus on profitability as measured by the most frequently used REIT earnings measurement on a per share basis; mitigates the risk of non-profitable acquisitions or other low-quality growth

 

 50%

 

  $1.79

 

  $1.82

 

  $1.85

 

   

 

$1.82

 

 

 

Target Normalized FFO per share represents an approximate 11% increase over the 2021 cash bonus target and a 4.0% increase over 2021 results as compared to 2.76% for US Healthcare REITs.(1)(2)

 

     

 

EBITDA/Interest Expense Ratio

Motivates management to maintain financial health and a low cost of capital

 

 20%

 

  3.5x

 

  3.7x

 

  3.9x

 

   

 

4.3x

 

 

 

The 3.4x target ratio was established based on our historical strategies and debt levels as publicly disclosed during recent years.

 

     

 

Environmental, Social and Corporate Governance

Encourages management to prioritize and execute on annual ESG initiatives

 

 10%

 

  Compensation Committee’s Assessment

 

  

 

Achieved
Annual ESG
Initiatives

 

 
 
 

 

ESG accomplishments include (i) improved MSCI rating to BBB, (ii) ranked by Modern Healthcare as one of the best places to work for millennials, (iii) engaged multiple advisors to assist in our ESG strategy and environmental data collection and (iv) hired a dedicated ESG professional.

 

     

 

Qualitative Performance Review

Represents indicators of the executive’s success in fulfilling his responsibilities to the Company and in executing its strategic business plan

 

 

 

20%

  

 

Compensation Committee’s Assessment

 

 

 

 

See Below

 

 

See below for additional detail on the Compensation Committee’s review of qualitative performance.

 

     

How We Determined Qualitative Performance for the Annual Cash Bonus Plan

The Compensation Committee approved, a peer group comprising:
• REITs that primarily invest in healthcare and/or medical property assets (Alexandria, Healthcare Realty Trust, Healthcare Trustassessed qualitative performance of America, LTC, Omega and Sabra)
• Specialty REITs that require management to have knowledge of tenant operations (CyrusOne, DuPont Fabros, EPR)
• Hospital companies that are comparable to MPW in terms of knowledge and skills necessary for the executive team to effectively manage the Company and its facilities (HealthSouth, Lifepoint); and triple-net lease REITs that enter into long-term leases with operators (Hudson Pacific, National Retail)
The 2015 peer group is composedof each NEO, which accounts for only 20% of the same companiesoverall bonus. Our NEOs’ performance is most directly tied to the Company’s overall financial and operational accomplishments and accordingly, the Committee assessed the qualitative component based on the following key considerations:

LOGO

Year-over year growth in Normalized FFO per share(1) of 4.0% as compared to 2.76% median growth at U.S. Healthcare REITs(2)

LOGO

Closed on $1.1 billion in new investments during 2022

LOGO

Ten consecutive years of annual dividend growth, with a 3.8% compound annual growth rate

LOGO

Continued to improve tenant diversification by expanding the number of operators to 55 (from 53 in 2021)

LOGO

Continued to expand our global footprint with the acquisition of four hospitals in Finland and the acquisition of six additional Priory assets

(1)

Refer to Appendix A for our definition of FFO and Normalized FFO and a reconciliation of net income to FFO and Normalized FFO.

(2)

Information based on KeyBanc Equity REIT Leaderboard, published December 31, 2022.

 30    Proxy Statement and Notice of 2023 Annual Meeting


Compensation Discussion and Analysis

Based on the above and the 2022 performance highlights previously discussed under “2022 Performance Highlights”, the Compensation Committee determined that were in our 2014 peer group,the qualitative component of the 2022 cash bonus program was earned at the full 20%, with overall cash bonus amounts as follows:

Named Executive Officer

  2022 Earned Bonus
($)
  2021 Earned Bonus
($)
  % Change

Edward K. Aldag, Jr.

  2,500,000  3,000,000  -17%

R. Steven Hamner

  1,265,625  1,518,750  -17%

Emmett E. McLean

     756,250     962,500  -21%

2022 Annual Equity Awards

We use a balanced approach to equity compensation and grant a combination of both time-based shares and performance-based shares, with the exceptionmajority of the removalawards (approximately 66%) vesting contingent on performance and 100% at-risk. The time-based portion of the award is intended to promote retention, while also subjecting our executives to the same market fluctuations faced by our stockholders.

In 2022, our NEOs were granted time-based shares that vest in 2015equal quarterly installments over three years as follows:

 

 

 

    Target Value of Time-Based Shares ($)    

 

 

Named Executive Officer

2022(1)2021% Change

Edward K. Aldag, Jr.

4,250,0004,250,0000%

R. Steven Hamner

2,125,0002,125,0000%

Emmett E. McLean

   950,0001,300,000-27%

NEO Total

7,325,0007,675,000-5%

(1)

The grant date fair values, computed in accordance with ASC 718, were $4,109,811, $2,054,916, and $918,681 for Messrs. Aldag, Hamner and McLean, respectively.

The performance-based shares are designed to incentivize performance in both the long-run and short-run. Awards are earned subject to the achievement of Chamber Street Properties duethree-year goals, while also allowing a portion of the award to its pending merger with Gramercy Property Trust and BioMed Realty Trust duebe earned subject to its recent acquisition by Blackstone Mortgage.the achievement of one-year goals (maximum of 1/3 of the shares). The following tablechart provides key information about the peer group market astarget value of December 31, 2015.
Company
Implied Equity Market Cap(1)
Total Enterprise Value(2)
Total Assets(3)
Sector
Properties Outsideperformance-based shares granted to our NEOs in 2022.

 

 

    

 

    Target Value of Performance-Based Shares ($)    

     

 

Named Executive Officer

    2022(1)    2021    % Change

Edward K. Aldag, Jr.

      8,250,000      8,250,000    0%

R. Steven Hamner

      4,125,000      4,125,000    0%

Emmett E. McLean

      1,950,000      2,600,000    -25%

NEO Total

    14,325,000    14,975,000    -4%

(1)

The grant date fair values, computed in accordance with ASC 718, were $8,270,489, $4,135,256, and $1,954,860 for Messrs. Aldag, Hamner and McLean, respectively.

Proxy Statement and Notice of 2023 Annual Meeting    31 


Compensation Discussion and Analysis

The 2022 performance shares can be earned based on the following goals set by the Compensation Committee, which include both long-term and annual goals to align with our strategic business plan and our commitment to sustained growth that will ultimately drive long-term value creation. The 2022 performance metrics were selected in accordance with our strategic business plan and include goals for FFO per share growth, EBITDA and acquisitions.

 

 

  FFO per Share Growth   EBITDA (in millions)
($)
   Acquisitions (in millions)
($)
 
 

 

    2022       2024       2022       2024       2022       2024   

Threshold (50%)

   2.00   4.00  $1,475.0   $1,550.0   $500.0   $1,500.0 

Target (100%)

   4.00   8.00  $1,487.5   $1,575.0   $750.0   $2,250.0 

Maximum (200%)(1)

   6.00   12.00  $1,500.0   $1,600.0   $1,000.0   $3,000.0 

(1)

Mr. McLean’s maximum is 150% of target.

Performance is measured over the three-year performance period and shares are earned based on the three-year performance goals listed above. To further strengthen alignment with our stockholders, any earned shares are subject to both an absolute and relative TSR modifier. One-half of the U.S.
Triple Net-Leased Properties
Alexandria Real Estate Equities, Inc.
$6,555.5
$11,082.2
$8,911.1
Office/Specialty
Yes
Yes
CyrusOne, Inc.
2,717.2
3,861.6
2,195.6
Diversified
Yes
Yes
DuPont Fabros Technology, Inc.
2,574.6
4,098.9
2,815.5
Specialty
No
Yes
EPR Properties
3,555.2
5,879.0
4,217.3
Specialty
Yes
Yes
Healthcare Realty Trust, Inc.
2,875.0
4,302.4
2,816.7
Health Care
No
No
Healthcare Trust of America, Inc.
3,475.4
4,695.5
3,310.5
Health Care
No
Yes
HealthSouth Corp.
3,136.4
5,479.6
4,606.1
Specialty Hospitals
No
No
Hudson Pacific Properties, Inc.
4,093.0
6,572.9
6,254.0
Office
No
Yes
Lifepoint Hospitals, Inc.
2,697.3
5,231.8
5,996.8
Hospitals
No
No
LTC Properties, Inc.
1,619.8
2,178.8
1,275.4
Health Care
No
Yes
National Retail Properties, Inc.
5,647.4
8,184.3
5,460.0
Free Standing
No
Yes
Omega Healthcare Investors, Inc.
6,866.5
10,432.1
8,019.0
Health Care
No
Yes
Sabra Health Care REIT, Inc.
1,318.6
2,852.2
2,486.2
Health Care
No
Yes
Medical Properties Trust, Inc.
2,728.0
5,860.0
5,609.4
Health Care
Yes
Yes
Peer Group Median
3,136.4
5,231.8
4,217.3
[1] Includes outstanding commonearned shares will be adjusted between 75% to 125% based on relative TSR performance between the 25th percentile to the 75th percentile, and OP units.
[2] Represents the market capitalization of ongoing operations, including common capitalization at market value and all non-common equity, debt and mezzanine at book value, less cash and cash equivalents at book value as reported by SNL Financial LC.
[3] Total assets as reported by SNL Financial are asone-half of the mostearned shares will be adjusted between 75% to 125% based on absolute TSR performance between 0% and 6% per annum.

To track the recently available quarterly data.
27 Medical Properties Trust

milestone progress during the performance period and to incentivize the consistent execution of our strategy and business plan, up to one-third of the target award may be earned at the end of 2022. The Compensation Committee believes that using one-year and three-year goals creates a balanced program that ensures that management remains focused in both the short-term and the long-term to drive consistent market-leading growth.


LOGOHow We Determine Annual Equity Awards

Executive Compensation
Other AspectsEquity compensation is a critical component of Our Executive Compensation Program
our executive compensation program that directly aligns our NEOs’ long-term interests with our stockholders and provides additional retention for our executives. Grants were approved in January 2022 based on the following considerations:

Our consistent and significant performance achievements over both the short- and long-term periods:

Strong earnings growth including an approximate 34% cumulative annual growth in net income since the beginning of 2020

Year-over year growth in Normalized FFO per share(1) of 4.0% as compared to 2.76% median growth at U.S. Healthcare REITs(2)

Closed on $1.1 billion in new investments during 2022 and $13 billion since the beginning of 2019

Ten consecutive years of annual dividend growth, with a 3.8% compound annual growth rate

A significant portion of our annual equity awards are tied to significant performance achievements that align and reward our executives for successfully executing on our strategic growth plan and only earn value to the extent that these significant performance hurdles are achieved

The Compensation Committee’s assessment of our NEOs’ overall compensation relative to our peer group and the confirmation that the value realized by NEOs was materially impacted by lost equity value in 2022 (consistent with the intent of our pay-for-performance compensation structure).

 32    Proxy Statement and Notice of 2023 Annual Meeting


Compensation Discussion and Analysis

Based on this review, our Compensation Committee made the following decisions related to grants made in January 2022 and 2023:

Most Recent Action by the
Compensation Committee

No increases to target equity values for the CEO and CFO in 2022 or 2023. For our COO, Mr. McLean, his target equity values decreased in 2022 and 2023.

Additionally, the pay mix of the equity awards was designed so that the majority of the awards vest contingent on achievement of rigorous performance goals (reflects approximately 66% of the market value on the date of grant).

(1)

Refer to Appendix A for our definition of FFO and Normalized FFO and a reconciliation of net income to FFO and Normalized FFO.

(2)

Information based on KeyBanc Equity REIT Leaderboard, published December 31, 2022

Other Benefits

We maintain a 401(k) Retirement Savingsretirement savings plan and annually match 100% of the first three percent (3%)3% of pay contributed, plus fifty percent (50%)50% of the next two percent (2%)2% of pay contributed, to such plan by any employee (subject to certain tax limitations). We offer medical, dental, and vision plans, and pay the coverage cost under these plans for all employees.the NEOs and their eligible dependents. Each of our NEOs has an employment agreementsagreement with us pursuant to which certain other benefits are provided to them. The material terms of each such employment agreement are set forth indescribed under “Employment Agreements with Named Executive Officers” below.
Practices with Regard to Dates and Pricing

Proxy Statement and Notice of 2023 Annual Meeting    33 


Compensation Discussion and Analysis

Other Aspects of Stock and Option Grants
TheOur Executive Compensation Committee determines the number of shares underlying grants of restricted stock awards and the executive officers who will receive such awards. All NEOs must receive prior authorization for any purchase or sale of our common stock.
We have never granted stock options to our executive officers, and we have not granted any options since those granted to our initial directors in 2004.
Program

Equity Ownership Guidelines

We believe that equity ownership by our directors and officers can help further align their interests with our shareholders’stockholders’ interests. To that end, we have adopted equity ownership guidelines applicable to our directors and to key executive officers. While there are no penalties for failure to meet the ownership levels discussed below, we will report ownership status to our Compensation Committee on an annual basis. Failure to meet the ownership levels or show sustained progress towards meeting them, may result in payment to the directors and the key executive officers of future compensation in the form of equity rather than cash.

With respect to our key executive officers and non-employee directors, the guidelines require ownership of shares of our common stock, including vested and unvested common stock within five years of becoming an executive officer or from promotion tothree years after a new executive officer position,non-employee director initially joins the Board, with a value equal to the following multiple of his or her base salary:
Title
Multiple of Base Salary
Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President
6x
Executive Vice Presidents (including CFO and COO)
4x
Our ownership guidelines also require ownership by each non-employee director of shares of our common stock, including vested and unvested common stock, in an amount equal to at least three times thesalary (or annual fee paid to such director. Non-employee directors must comply withfor the ownership requirement within a period of three years after he or she initially joins the Board, and must come back into compliance within three years in the event that he or she should fall short of this ownership requirement at any time. All of our non-employee directors and NEOs met the equity ownership guidelines as of December 31, 2015.
Proxy Statement and Notice of 2016 Annual Meeting 28

directors):


Title

Multiple
of Base
Salary /
Annual Fee
Compliance
with
Guidelines

Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President

6xYes

Executive Vice Presidents (including CFO and COO)

4xYes

Non-Employee Directors

3x*

LOGO

*

All of our non-employee directors and NEOs as of March 29, 2023 met the equity ownership guidelines, except for Ms. Mozingo, Ms. Murphy, Ms. Pitman and Mr. Thompson. Ms. Murphy has three years from her initial election to the Board to reach compliance. Ms. Mozingo, Ms. Pitman and Mr. Thompson are not in compliance with the equity ownership guidelines as a result of the decrease in the price of our common stock. We anticipate that they will be back in compliance with the guidelines within the next 12 months.

Executive Compensation

Clawback Policy

In February 2013, the Board adopted a clawback policy applicable to our executive officers. The policy allows for the recoupment of incentive awards (including awards made under our annual cash bonus plan and long-term incentive plans) in the event the Company is required to restate its financial statements due to the material noncompliance of the Company with financial reporting requirements under the securities laws, as a result of intentional misconduct, fraud or gross negligence.

Each executive officer who is directly responsible for the intentional misconduct, fraud or gross negligence shall reimburse the Company for incentive awards made to that executive officer after January 1, 2013, that would not have been made if the restated financial measures had been reported initially.
Prohibited Transactions

In light of the SEC’s adoption of final clawback rules in October 2022 and the NYSE’s issuance of its proposed rule in February 2023, we intend to update our clawback policy to comply with applicable NYSE listing rules when effective.

No Hedging or Pledging

The Company maintains an internal “Insider Trading Policy” that is applicable to our executive officers and directors. TheAmong other things, the policy prohibits any director or executive officeremployee of the Company (including directors or executive officers) from (i) engaging in short sales of the Company’s securities and from trading in puts, calls, options or other derivative securities based on the Company’s securities. The policy also prohibits directors and executive officers of the Company fromsecurities, (ii) engaging in certain forms of hedging or monetization transactions which(which allow the shareholdera stockholder to continue to own the covered securities, but without the full risks and rewards of ownership.
Through 2015ownership) and (iii) pledging the policy also discouraged the holding of Company securities in a margin account or pledging Company securities as collateral for a loan. No NEO has pledged any shares under any circumstances in more than five years. However, beginning in 2016, the policy now prohibits the pledging of CompanyCompany’s securities as loan collateral.

Other Practices with Regard to Equity Awards and Purchases and Sales of Shares

The Compensation Committee determines the number of shares underlying grants of restricted stock awards and the executive officers who will receive such awards. All NEOs must receive prior authorization for any purchase or sale of our common stock.

We have never granted stock options to our executive officers, and we have not granted any stock options since those granted to our initial directors in 2004.

 34    Proxy Statement and Notice of 2023 Annual Meeting


Compensation Discussion and Analysis

Compensation Risk Assessment

During 2015,2022, the Compensation Committee reviewed the potential risks in the Company’s compensation program to ensure that compensation methods do not incentivize our executives to make decisions that, while creating apparent short-term financial and operating success, may in the longer termlonger-term result in future losses and other value depreciation.

After reviewing the analysis, the Compensation Committee concluded that the Company’s compensation program doespolicies and practices do not encourage excessive risk taking nor create any risks that would be reasonably likely to have a materially adverse effect on the Company, and it believes that the following risk oversight and compensation design features assist in guarding against excessive risk taking:
• Review and approval of corporate objectives by the Compensation Committee to ensure that these goals are aligned with the Company’s annual operating and strategic plans, achieve the proper risk/reward balance, and do not encourage excessive risk taking.
• Base salaries consistent with each executive’s responsibilities so that they are not motivated to take excessive risks to achieve a reasonable level of financial security.
• A significant portion of each executive’s compensation that is tied to the future stock performance of the Company.
• Stock compensation and vesting periods for stock awards that encourage executives to focus on sustained stock price appreciation.
• A mix between cash and equity compensation that is designed to encourage strategies and actions that are in the long-term best interests of the Company and its shareholders.
29 Medical Properties Trust


Review and approval of corporate objectives by the Compensation Committee to ensure that these goals are aligned with the Company’s annual operating and strategic plans, achieve the proper risk/reward balance, and do not encourage excessive risk taking

LOGO

Base salaries consistent with each executive’s responsibilities so that they are not motivated to take excessive risks to achieve a reasonable level of financial security

Executive Compensation
MPT

A significant portion of each executive’s compensation is tied to the future stock performance of the Company

Stock compensation and vesting periods for stock awards designed to encourage executives to focus on sustained stock price appreciation

A mix between cash and equity compensation designed to encourage strategies and actions that are in the long-term best interests of the Company and its stockholders.

Section 162(m) Policy

The SEC requires that this report comment uponCompensation Committee’s policy is to consider the Company’s policytax treatment of compensation paid to our executive officers while simultaneously seeking to provide our executives with respect toappropriate rewards for their performance. Under Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code, a publicly-held corporation may not deduct compensation of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), which limits the deductibility on the Company’s tax return of compensation overmore than $1 million paid to any of the NEOs of the Company other than the Chief Financial Officer unless, in general, the compensation is paid pursuant to a plan which is performance-related, non-discretionary, and has been approved by the Company’s shareholders.“covered employee.” The CompanyCompensation Committee believes that because it qualifies as a REIT understockholder interests are best served if they retain maximum flexibility to design executive compensation programs that meet stated business objectives. For that reason, while our Board and Compensation Committee have considered the Code and pays dividends sufficient to minimize federal income taxes, the payment of compensation that does not satisfy the requirementspotential effects of Section 162(m) will generally not affectof the Company’s net income. ToCode on the extent that compensation does not qualify for a deduction under Section 162(m), a larger portion of shareholder distributions may be subjectpaid to federal income taxation as dividend income rather than return of capital. The Company does not believe that Section 162(m) will materially affect the taxability of shareholder distributions, although no assurance can be given in this regard due to the variety of factors that affect the tax position of each shareholder. For these reasons,our named executive officers, the Compensation Committee’s compensation policy and practices are not directly guided by considerations relating to Section 162(m).
of the Code. In addition, because we qualify as a REIT under the Code, we generally distribute at least 100% of our net taxable income each year and therefore do not pay federal income tax. As a result, the possible loss of a federal tax deduction would not be expected to have a material impact on us.

Proxy Statement and Notice of 2023 Annual Meeting    35 


Compensation Discussion and Analysis

Compensation Committee Report

The Compensation Committee has reviewed and discussed with management the Compensation Discussion and Analysis beginning on page 1819 of this Proxy Statement. Based on such review and discussions, the Compensation Committee recommended to the Board of Directors that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this Proxy Statement.
D. Paul Sparks, Jr. (Chairman) Robert E. Holmes, Ph.D. Sherry A. Kellett

C. Reynolds Thompson, III. (Chairman)Michael G. StewartD. Paul Sparks, Jr.

 36    Proxy Statement and Notice of 2023 Annual Meeting


Compensation Discussion and Analysis

Summary Compensation Table

The amounts in the table below are a summary of the components of compensation our NEOs received in the last three years:

Name

  Year   

Salary

($)

   

Bonus(1)

($)

   

Stock
Awards
(2)

($)

   

Non-Equity
Incentive Plan
Compensation
(3)

($)

   

All Other
Compensation

($)

  

Total

($)

 

Edward K. Aldag, Jr.

   2022    1,000,000    600,000    12,380,300    1,900,000    145,213  (4)   16,025,513     

Chairman, Chief Executive

   2021    1,000,000    600,000    12,928,532    2,400,000    108,097   17,036,629     

Officer and President

   2020    1,000,000    600,000    12,732,033    2,400,000    125,604   16,857,637     

R. Steven Hamner

   2022    675,000    303,750    6,190,172    961,875    32,974  (5)   8,163,771     

Director, Executive

   2021    675,000    303,750    6,464,266    1,215,000    27,313   8,685,329     

Vice President,

Chief Financial Officer

   2020    675,000    303,750    6,366,029    1,215,000    61,643   8,621,422     

Emmett E. McLean

   2022    550,000    192,500    2,873,541    563,750    40,690  (6)   4,220,481     

Executive Vice President,

   2021    550,000    192,500    4,034,826    770,000    64,625   5,611,951     

Chief Operating Officer

and Secretary

   2020    550,000    192,500    4,738,268    770,000    65,251   6,316,019     

(1)

Reflects the cash bonus earned by our named executive officers for the applicable year based on a qualitative review of individual performance by the Compensation Committee.

(2)

Represents the aggregate grant date fair value of restricted stock awards, calculated in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. For awards subject to performance-based vesting conditions, the value reported reflects the fair value of the award at the grant date based upon the probable outcome of the performance conditions. The reported value for performance awards granted in 2022 was $8,270,489; $4,135,256; and $1,954,860 for Messrs. Aldag, Hamner, and McLean, respectively. The value of the award at the grant date, assuming that the highest level of performance conditions will be achieved, would be $20,676,223; $10,338,140; and $3,665,364 for Messrs. Aldag, Hamner, and McLean, respectively. Assumptions used in the calculation of these amounts are included in Note 7 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in our 2022 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

(3)

Reflects the cash bonus earned by our named executive officers for the applicable year based on the achievement of specified corporate goals.

(4)

Represents $12,200 in Company 401(k) match, $7,877 for health insurance, a $12,000 automobile allowance, $52,248 for the cost of tax preparation and financial planning services, $51,888 for the cost of life insurance, $3,312 for disability insurance and $5,688 for annual physical. These amounts are inclusive of $46,863 to reimburse Mr. Aldag for his tax liabilities associated with such payments.

(5)

Represents $12,200 in Company 401(k) match, $7,877 for health insurance, $3,897 for the cost of tax preparation and a $9,000 automobile allowance. These amounts are inclusive of $1,456 to reimburse Mr. Hamner for his tax liabilities associated with such payments.

(6)

Represents $12,200 in Company 401(k) match, $7,877 for health insurance, a $9,000 automobile allowance, $9,540 for the cost of tax preparation, $873 for the cost of disability insurance and $1,200 for fitness reimbursement. These amounts are inclusive of $4,076 to reimburse Mr. McLean for his tax liabilities associated with such payments.

Proxy Statement and Notice of 2023 Annual Meeting    37 


Compensation Discussion and Analysis

Grants of Plan-Based Awards

The following table provides information about plan-based awards granted to our NEOs during 2022. For further detail regarding each of these awards, see “Compensation Discussion and NoticeAnalysis—Elements of 2016Pay.”

Name

 

 

Grant Date

 

  

 

Estimated Future Payouts
Under Non-Equity

Incentive Plan Awards(1)

 

  

Estimated Future Payouts
Under Equity Incentive

Plan Awards(2)

 

  All Other
Stock
Awards:
Number of
Shares of
Stock
or Units
(#)
  

Grant
Date Fair
Value of
Stock
and

Option
Awards
($)

 
 Threshold
($)
  

Target

($)

 

  Maximum
($)
  Threshold
(#)
  

Target

(#)

 

  Maximum
(#)
 

Edward K. Aldag, Jr.

  1/28/2022   800,000   1,600,000   2,400,000   –     –     –     –     –   

 

  1/28/2022   –     –     –     –     –     –     188,437(3)   4,109,811 
 

 

  1/28/2022   –     –     –     137,171(4)   365,789(4)   914,473(4)   –     8,270,489 

R. Steven Hamner

  1/28/2022   540,000   810,00   1,215,000   –     –     –     –     –   

 

  1/28/2022   –     –     –     –     –     –     94,219(3)   2,054,916 
 

 

  1/28/2022   –     –     –     68,586(4)   182,895(4)   457,238(4)   –     4,135,256 

Emmett E. McLean

  1/28/2022   220,000   440,000   770,000   –     –     –     –     –   

 

  1/28/2022   –     –     –     –     –     –     42,122(3)   918,681 
 

 

  1/28/2022   –     –     –     32,423(4)   86,460(4)   162,113(4)   –     1,954,860 

(1)

Represents cash incentive compensation opportunity, which can be earned based upon the achievement of formulaic corporate goals in the annual cash bonus program.

(2)

Represents awards of performance-based restricted stock. Dividends are not paid on performance-based awards until the award is earned.

(3)

Represents the annual time-based restricted stock awards that will vest quarterly over a period of three years. The grant date fair value of the time-based restricted stock is $21.81 per share. Eligibility to receive dividends on the time-based stock awards starts on the date of grant.

(4)

Represents 2022 FFO per share growth, EBITDA and acquisitions awards, which are earned based on the Company’s achievement of specific one-year and three-year goals for the periods of January 1, 2022 to December 31, 2022 and January 1, 2022 to December 31, 2024. The awards are also subject to an absolute and relative TSR modifier for the respective performance periods which can increase/decrease the number of shares earned by up to 25%. The grant date fair value of these awards is $22.61 per share.

 38    Proxy Statement and Notice of 2023 Annual Meeting


Compensation Discussion and Analysis

Outstanding Equity Awards as of December 31, 2022

The table below shows the outstanding equity awards held by our NEOs as of December 31, 2022. Market values are based on a price of $11.14 per share, the closing price of our common stock on December 30,

2022, the last trading day of 2022.


  

 

Option Awards

 

  

 

Stock Awards

 

 

Name

 

 

Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options (#)
Exercisable

 

  

Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options (#)
Unexercisable

 

  

Equity
Incentive Plan
Awards:
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unearned
Options
(#)

 

  

Option
Exercise
Price
($)

 

  

Option
Expiration
Date

 

  

Number of
Shares or
Units of
Stock
That Have
Not Vested
(#)

 

  

Market
Value of
Shares or
Units of
Stock
That Have
Not Vested
($)

 

  

Equity
Incentive Plan
Awards:
Number of
Unearned
Shares, Units
or Other
Rights That
Have Not
Vested (#)

 

  

 

Equity  
Incentive Plan  
Awards:  
Market or  
Payout Value  
of Unearned  
Shares, Units  
or Other   
Rights That  
Have Not  
Vested ($)

 

 

Edward K. Aldag, Jr.

  –     –     –     –     –     253,001(1)   2,818,431   858,737(4)   9,566,330 

R. Steven Hamner

  –     –     –     –     –     126,507(2)   1,409,288   429,367(5)   4,783,148 

Emmett E. McLean

  –     –     –     –     –     65,925(3)   734,405   255,786(6)   2,849,456 

LOGO

(1)

For Mr. Aldag includes (i) 59,800 shares that vested on January 1, 2023, (ii) 67,580 shares that vest in equal quarterly installments from April 1, 2023 through January 1, 2024 and (iii) 125,621 shares vest in equal quarterly installments from April 1, 2023 through January 1, 2025.

(2)

For Mr. Hamner includes (i) 29,906 shares that vested on January 1, 2023, (ii) 33,790 shares that vest in equal quarterly installments from April 1, 2023 through January 1, 2024 and (iii) 62,811 shares that vest in equal quarterly installments from April 1, 2023 through January 1, 2025.

(3)

For Mr. McLean includes (i) 17,182 shares that vested on January 1, 2023, (ii) 20,665 shares vest in equal quarterly installments from April 1, 2023 through January 1, 2024 and (iii) 28,078 shares vest in equal quarterly installments from April 1, 2023 through January 1, 2025.

(4)

For Mr. Aldag includes (i) 230,568 shares underlying the 2020 Performance Award†, (ii) 262,380 shares underlying the 2021 Performance Award‡ and (iii) 365,789 shares underlying the 2022 Performance Award* remain unearned.

(5)

For Mr. Hamner includes (i) 115,284 shares underlying the 2020 Performance Award†, (ii) 131,188 shares underlying the 2021 Performance Award‡ and (iii) 182,895 shares underlying the 2022 Performance Award* remain unearned.

(6)

For Mr. McLean includes (i) 86,638 shares underlying the 2020 Performance Award†, (ii) 82,688 shares underlying the 2021 Performance Award‡ and (iii) 86,460 shares underlying the 2022 Performance Award* remain unearned.

The 2020 Performance Award is earned based on the achievement of FFO per Share Growth, EBITDA and acquisitions goals over a three-year period with the ability to earn up to one-third of the award in 2020 based on one-year goals. Any earned shares are subject to an absolute TSR and relative TSR modifier (based on one-year TSR for any shares earned based on one-year goals and three-year TSR for the majority of the award based on three-year goals) that can increase or decrease the award up to 25%. Up to one-third of the shares subject to the EBITDA award were eligible to be earned if EBITDA was $850 million for 2020 and 100% of shares were eligible to earned if EBITDA was $940 million in the third year of the performance period. Up to one-third of the shares subject to the FFO per Share Growth award were eligible to be earned if FFO per Share Growth was 4% for 2020 and 100% of shares were eligible to be earned if FFO per Share Growth was 12% for the three-year performance period. Up to one-third of the shares subject to the acquisitions award were eligible to be earned if acquisitions were $750 million for 2020 and 100% of shares were eligible to be earned if acquisitions were $2.25 billion for the three-year performance period. Any earned shares vest on the January 1 immediately following the date on which the shares are earned.

The 2021 Performance Award is earned based on the achievement of FFO per Share Growth, EBITDA and acquisitions goals over a three-year period with the ability to earn up to one-third of the award in 2021 based on one-year goals. Any earned shares are subject to an absolute TSR and relative TSR modifier (based on one-year TSR for any shares earned based on one-year goals and three-year TSR for the majority of the award based on three-year goals) that can increase or decrease the award up to 25%. Up to one-third of the shares subject to the EBITDA award were eligible to be earned if EBITDA was $1.3 billion for 2021 and 100% of shares are eligible to be earned if EBITDA is $1.4 billion in the third year of the performance period. Up to one-third of the shares subject to the FFO per Share Growth award were eligible to be earned if FFO per Share Growth was 3.75% for 2021 and 100% of shares are eligible to be earned if FFO per Share Growth is 11.25% for the three-year performance period. Up to one-third of the shares subject to the acquisitions award were eligible be earned if acquisitions were $750 million for 2021 and 100% of shares were eligible to be earned if acquisitions were $2.25 billion for the three-year performance period. Any earned shares vest on the January 1 immediately following the date on which the shares are earned.

*

The 2022 Performance Award is earned based on the achievement of FFO per Share Growth, EBITDA and acquisitions goals over a three-year period with the ability to earn up to one-third of the award in 2022 based on one-year goals. Any earned shares are subject to an absolute TSR and relative TSR modifier (based on one-year TSR for any shares earned based on one-year goals and three-year TSR for the majority of the award based on three-year goals) that can increase or decrease the award up to 25%. Up to one-third of the shares subject to the EBITDA award were eligible to be earned if EBITDA was $1.4875 billion for 2022 and 100% of shares are eligible to be earned if EBITDA is $1.575 billion in the third year of the performance period. Up to one-third of the shares subject to the FFO per Share Growth award were eligible to be earned if FFO per Share Growth was 4.0% for 2022 and 100% of shares are eligible to be earned if FFO per Share Growth is 8.0% for the three-year performance period. Up to one-third of the shares subject to the acquisitions award were eligible to be earned if acquisitions were $750 million for 2022 and 100% of shares are eligible to be earned if acquisitions are $2.25 billion for the three-year performance period. Any earned shares vest on the January 1 immediately following the date on which the shares are earned.

Proxy Statement and Notice of 2023 Annual Meeting    39 


Compensation Discussion and Analysis

Option Exercises and Stock Vested

The following table sets forth the aggregate number and value of shares of restricted common stock held by our NEOs that vested in 2022. The “Value Realized on Vesting” set forth below is the product of the fair market value of a share of common stock on the vesting date multiplied by the number of shares vesting. We have never issued stock options to our NEOs.

   

 

Option Awards

 

   

 

Stock Awards

 

 

Name

 

  

Number of Shares
Acquired on
Exercise

(#)

 

   

Value Realized
on
Exercise

($)

 

   

Number of Shares
Acquired on
Vesting
(#)

 

   

 

Value Realized
on Vesting

($)

 

 

Edward K. Aldag, Jr.

   –      –      1,655,159    37,752,981 

R. Steven Hamner

   –      –      827,573    18,876,348 

Emmett E. McLean

   –      –      648,370    14,927,196 

Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change of Control

The following table shows potential payments and benefits that will be provided to our NEOs upon the occurrence of certain termination triggering events. The change-of-control provisions in the employment agreements are designed to align management’s interests with those of our stockholders. See the discussion below under “Employment Agreements with Named Executive Compensation
CompensationOfficers” for information about payments upon termination or a change of Executive Officers
control. All equity interests included in the termination and change of control calculations represent previously granted restricted stock awards and are valued based on the closing price of our common stock on December 30, 2022, the last trading day of 2022, and an assumed termination of employment on December 31, 2022.

Name

  

Termination and
Change of
Control

($)

   

Death

($)

   

Termination
Not for Cause;
By Executive for
Good Reason;
Permanent Disability

($)

   

Termination for     
Cause; By Executive     
without Good Reason     

($)

Edward K. Aldag, Jr.

  

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

  

 

Cash Severance

   12,315,384(2)    39,386    12,315,384(3)   –  

Equity-Award Acceleration(1)

   27,202,159    27,202,159    27,202,159    

 

R. Steven Hamner

  

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

  

 

Cash Severance

   6,631,882(2)    23,632    6,378,757   –  

Equity-Award Acceleration(1)

   13,601,077    13,601,077    13,601,077    

 

Emmett, E. McLean

  

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

  

 

Cash Severance

   4,590,751(2)    23,632    4,384,501   –  

Equity-Award Acceleration(1)

   6,790,947    6,790,947    6,790,947    

 

(1)

As of January 1, 2023, the amount that would accelerate upon a change of control CoC would be reduced to $18,845,379 for Mr. Aldag, $9,422,613 for Mr. Hamner and $4,332,956 for Mr. McLean as a result of shares that vested on January 1, 2023.

(2)

Amounts exclude tax related payments including any tax gross-ups in connection with a CoC. While the precise amount of any tax-related payments is difficult to calculate and may be mitigated based on a number of considerations, the estimated tax gross-up payments are $0 for Mr. Aldag, Mr. Hamner and Mr. McLean as of December 31, 2022.

(3)

Amount excludes an estimated tax payment of $5,442,000.

 40    Proxy Statement and Notice of 2023 Annual Meeting


Compensation Discussion and Analysis

Employment Agreements with Named Executive Officers
Three of our

Our three founders have employment agreements that were negotiated in 2003 to market standards uponin connection with our initial equity offering in 2003.offering. Below we describe the terms of these agreements. Because certain market standards have evolved in recent years, and because onlysince our founders have these agreements, we have committed thatinitial equity offering, we will not enter into any new contracts that include a multi-year evergreen term, a single-trigger change inof control provisions, or exerciseexcise tax gross up provisions.

We have employment agreements with Edward K. Aldag, Jr., R. Steven Hamner and Emmett E. McLean. These employment agreements provided the following annual base salaries in 2015: Mr. Aldag, $950,000; Mr. Hamner, $575,000; and Mr. McLean, $525,000. For 2015, base salaries were adjusted to reflect more appropriate peer group levels; our NEOs only receive periodic increases at the discretion of the Compensation Committee. These agreements provide that each NEO agrees to devote substantially all of his business time to our operation. The employment agreement for each of the NEOs isprovides for aan initial three-year term, which is automatically extended at the end of each year within such term for an additional one year period,successive one-year periods, unless either party gives notice of non-renewal as provided in the agreement.
The employment agreements provide that the NEOs are eligible to participate in our equity incentive plan. The employment agreements also provide that the NEOs are eligible to receive annual cash bonuses based on the bonus policy adopted by the Compensation Committee.
These employment agreements permit us to terminate each executive’s employment with appropriate notice for “cause,” which includes (i) the conviction of the executive of, or the entry of a plea of guilty or nolo contendere by the executive to, a felony (exclusive of any felony relating to negligent operation of a motor vehicle and also exclusive of a conviction, plea of guilty or nolo contendere arising solely under a statutory provision imposing criminal liability upon the executive on a per se basis due to the Company offices held by the executive, so long as any act or omission of the executive with respect to such matter was not taken or omitted in contravention of any applicable policy or directive of the Board of Directors), (ii) a willful breach of his duty of loyalty which is materially detrimental to the Company, (iii) a willful failure to materially perform or materially adhere to explicitly stated duties that are consistent with the terms of his employment agreement, or the Company’s reasonable and customary guidelines of employment or reasonable and customary corporate governance guidelines or policies, including, without limitation, any business code of ethics adopted by the Board of Directors, or to follow the lawful directives of the Board of Directors (provided such directives are consistent with the terms of his employment agreement), which, in any such case, continues for thirty (30) days after written notice from the Board of Directors to the executive, or (iv) gross negligence or willful misconduct in the material performance of the executive’s duties.
Each of the NEOs has the right under his employment agreement to resign for “good reason,” which includes (i) the employment agreement is not automatically renewed by the Company; (ii) the termination of certain incentive compensation programs; (iii) the termination or diminution of certain employee benefit plans, programs, or material fringe benefits; (iv) the relocation of our principal office outside of a 100 mile radius of Birmingham, Alabama (in the case of Mr. Aldag); or (v) our breach of the employment agreement that continues uncured for 30 days. In addition, in the case of Mr. Aldag, the following constitute good reason: (i) his removal from the Board of Directors without cause or his failure to be nominated or elected to the Board of Directors; or (ii) any material reduction in duties, responsibilities, or reporting requirements, or the assignment of any duties, responsibilities, or reporting requirements that are inconsistent with his positions with us.

The executive employment agreements provide for an annual physical at the Company’s expense, a monthly car allowance of $1,000 for Mr. Aldag and $750 for each of Messrs. Hamner and McLean. The NEOs are also reimbursed for the cost of tax preparation and financial planning services, up to $25,000 annually for Mr. Aldag and $10,000 annually for each of Messrs. Hamner and McLean. We also reimburse each executive for the income tax he incurs on the receipt of these tax preparation and financial planning services. In addition, the employment agreements provide for annual paid vacation of six weeks for Mr. Aldag and four weeks for Messrs. Hamner and McLean, and various other customary benefits. The employment agreements also
31 Medical Properties Trust


LOGO

Executive Compensation MPT
provide that Mr. Aldag will receive up to $20,000 per year in reimbursement for life insurance premiums, which amount is to increaseincreases annually based on the increase in CPIthe consumer price index (“CPI”) for such year, and that Messrs. Hamner and McLean will receive up to $10,000 per year in reimbursement for life insurance premiums, which amount is to increaseincreases annually based on the increase in the CPI for such year. We also reimburse each executive for the income tax he incurs on the receipt of these life insurance premium reimbursements. The NEOs are also reimbursed for the cost of their disability insurance premiums.

The employment agreements provide that the executive officers are eligible to receive the same benefits, including medical insurance coverage and retirement plan benefits in a 401(k) plan, to the same extent as other similarly situated employees, and such other benefits as are commensurate with their position. Participation in employee benefit plans is subject to the terms of said benefit plans as in effect from timetime-to-time.

The employment agreements with the NEOs provide for contractual severance benefits and accelerated vesting of equity grants in the event of a change of control, which we believe are common in the REIT industry, are designed to time.
reinforce and encourage the continued attention and dedication of our executive officers to their assigned duties without distraction or fear of job loss in the face of an actual or threatened change of control and to ensure that our management is motivated to negotiate the best merger consideration for our stockholders.

If the NEO’s employment ends for any reason, we will pay accrued salary, bonuses, and incentive payments already determined but not yet paid, and other existing obligations. If an NEO’s employment terminates as a result of his “permanent disability” (as defined in the employment agreements), we terminate an NEO’s employment without cause,for any reason other than for “cause” (as defined in the employment agreements), or if any of theman NEO terminates his employment for good reason,“good reason” (as defined in the employment agreements), we will be obligated to pay (i) a lump sum payment of severance equal to the sum of (x) the product of three and the sum of the salary in effect at the time of termination plus the average cash bonus (or the highest cash bonus, in the case of Mr. Aldag) paid to such executive during the preceding three years, grossed up for taxes in the case of Mr. Aldag, and (y) the incentive bonus prorated for the year in which the termination occurred; (ii) the cost of the executive’s continued participation in the company’sCompany’s benefit and welfare plans (other than the 401(k) plan) for a three-year period (a five-year period in the case of Mr. Aldag); following termination; and (iii) certain other benefits as providedcontinued reimbursement for life insurance premiums and the taxes payable on such amounts for three years following termination (or five years in the employment agreement.case of Mr. Aldag). Additionally, in the event of aupon such termination, by us for any reason other than cause or by the executive for good reason, all of the stock options, if any, and restricted stock granted toheld by the executive will become fully vested, and the executive will have whatever period remains under the term of stock options in which to exercise all vested stock options.
The employment agreements also provide that the NEOs and their spouses and dependents will be permitted to continue to participate in all employee benefit and welfare plans and programs of the Company other than the 401(k) plan until the earlier of age 65 or such time as the NEO obtains full-time employment with an entity not affiliated with the NEO that provides comparable benefits.

In the event of the death of any of our NEOs, in addition to the accrued salary, bonus, and incentive payments due to them, their stock options and restricted stock shall become fully vested, and their respective beneficiaries will have whatever period remains under theany outstanding stock options held by the NEO to exercise such stock options. In addition, their estates would be entitled to theirthe NEO’s prorated incentive bonuses.
bonus payable in a lump sum and the NEO’s spouse and each of his dependents shall be covered under the Company’s health insurance program until the earlier of age 65 or such time as the spouse or dependent obtains full-time

Proxy Statement and Notice of 2023 Annual Meeting    41 


Compensation Discussion and Analysis

employment with an entity not affiliated with the NEO that provides comparable benefits. The Company shall pay for such coverage for three years (or five years in the case of Mr. Aldag) following the death of the NEO.

In the event that the employment of any of our NEOs ends as a result of a termination by us for cause or by the executivesNEO without good reason, then in addition to the accrued salary, bonuses and incentive payments due to them, the executives would be entitled to exercise theirany outstanding vested stock options held by the NEO, pursuant to the terms of the grant, but all other unvested stock options and restricted stock would be forfeited.
forfeited upon termination.

Upon a change of control, the NEOs will become fully vested in their stock options and restricted stock and will have whatever period remains under the stock options in which to exercise their stock options.equity awards. In addition, if the employment of any NEO is terminated by us for cause or by the executive without good reason in connection with a change of control, the executive will be entitled to receive an amount equal to the largest cash compensation paid to the executive for any twelve-month12-month period during his tenure multiplied by three. The contractual severance benefits and accelerated vesting of equity grants in the event of a change of control, which we believe are common in the REIT industry, are designed to reinforce and encourage the continued attention and dedication of our executive officers to their assigned duties without distraction or fear of job loss in the face of an actual or threatened change of control and to ensure that our management is motivated to negotiate the best merger consideration for our shareholders.

If payments become due as a result of a change inof control and the excise tax imposed by Code Section 4999 applies, the terms of the employment agreements require us to gross up the amount payable to the executive by the amount of this excise tax plus the amount of income and other taxes due as a result of the gross up payment.

For an 18-month period after termination of an executive’s employment for any reason other than (i) termination by us without cause or (ii) termination by the executive for good reason, each of the executives under these employment agreements has agreed not to compete with us by working with or investing in, subject to certain limited exceptions, any enterprise engaged in a business substantially similar to our business as it was conducted during the period of the executive’s employment with us.
Proxy Statementus and not to solicit our employees.

 42    Proxy Statement and Notice of 2023 Annual Meeting


LOGO

Pay Ratio Disclosure

In accordance with Item 402(u) of 2016 Annual Meeting32

Regulation S-K, promulgated by the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010, we determined the ratio of the annual total compensation of our CEO, Mr. Aldag, relative to the annual total compensation of our median employee.


LOGO

Executive Compensation
For the purposes of reporting annual total compensation and the ratio of annual total compensation of the CEO to the median employee, both the CEO and the median employee’s annual total compensation were calculated consistent with the requirements of the Summary Compensation Table
Table.

The amountsCompany’s methodology in the table below are a summary of the components of compensationdetermining our NEOs received in the last three years:
Year Salary Stock Awards Non Equity Incentive Plan Compensation(11) All Other Compensation Total Compensation
Edward K. Aldag, Jr. 2015 $950,000 $3,609,491(10) $1,805,000 $81,767(1) $6,446,258
Chairman, Chief Executive
Officer and President 2014 $600,000 $4,021,349 $1,857,000 $79,123(4) $6,557,472
2013 $600,000 $3,829,854 $1,817,250 $91,080(7) $6,338,184
Emmett E. McLean 2015 $525,000 $1,312,544(10) $735,000 $33,652(2) $2,606,196
Executive Vice President,
Chief Operating Officer, 2014 $395,000 $1,482,478 $867,519 $42,441(5) $2,787,438
Secretary and Treasurer
2013 $395,000 $1,408,192 $849,497 $41,292(8) $2,693,981
R. Steven Hamner 2015 $575,000 $1,810,249(10) $805,000 $69,052(3) $3,259,301
Director, Executive
Vice President, 2014 $400,000 $1,952,207 $878,500 $26,105(6) $3,256,812
Chief Financial Officer
2013 $400,000 $1,892,618 $860,250 $39,428(9) $3,192,296
(1) Represents $10,600 in company 401(k) match, $12,000 automobile allowance, $10,522 for the cost of tax preparation and financial planning services, $3,312 for the cost of disability insurance, and $45,333 for the cost of life insurance. These additional benefits include $23,655 to reimburse Mr. Aldag for his tax liabilities associated with such payments.
(2) Represents $10,600 in company 401(k) match, $9,000 automobile allowance, $1,665 for the cost of tax preparation, $4,479 for the cost of disability insurance, and $7,908 for the cost of life insurance. These additional benefits include $4,054 to reimburse Mr. McLean for his tax liabilities associated with such payments.
(3) Represents $10,600 in company 401(k) match, $9,000 automobile allowance, $8,959 for the cost of tax preparation, and $40,493 for the cost of life insurance. These additional benefits include $18,470 to reimburse Mr. Hamner for his tax liabilities associated with such payments.
(4) Represents $10,400 in company 401(k) match, $12,000 automobile allowance, $8,802 for the cost of tax preparation and financial planning services, $3,312 for the cost of disability insurance, and $44,609 for the cost of life insurance. These additional benefits include $22,620 to reimburse Mr. Aldag for his tax liabilities associated with such payments.
(5) Represents $10,400 in company 401(k) match, $9,000 automobile allowance, $7,762 for the cost of tax preparation, $536 for the cost of disability insurance, and $14,743 for the cost of life insurance. These additional benefits include $9,531 to reimburse Mr. McLean for his tax liabilities associated with such payments.
(6) Represents $10,400 in company 401(k) match, $9,000 automobile allowance, $5,816 for the cost of tax preparation, and $889 for the cost of life insurance. These additional benefits include $2,504 to reimburse Mr. Hamner for his tax liabilities associated with such payments.
(7) Represents $10,200 in company 401(k) match, $12,000 automobile allowance, $15,172 for the cost of tax preparation and financial planning services, $3,312 for the cost of disability insurance, and $50,396 for the cost of life insurance. These additional benefits include $27,768 to reimburse Mr. Aldag for his tax liabilities associated with such payments.
(8) Represents $10,200 in company 401(k) match, $9,000 automobile allowance, $7,285 for the cost of tax preparation, $65 for the cost of disability insurance, and $14,742 for the cost of life insurance. These additional benefits include $9,329 to reimburse Mr. McLean for his tax liabilities associated with such payments.
(9) Represents $10,200 in company 401(k) match, $9,000 automobile allowance, and $20,228 for the cost of life insurance. These additional benefits include $7,555 to reimburse Mr. Hamner for his tax liabilities associated with such payments.
(10) A portion of this stock award contains performance-based vesting conditions and the value reported reflects the value of the award at the grant date based upon the probable outcome of the performance conditions. The reported value for these performance awards was $2,226,546; $870,005; and $1,181,639 for Messers. Aldag, McLean, and Hamner, respectively. The value of the award at the grant date, assuming that the highest level of performance conditions will be achieved, would be $4,903,130; $1,951,196; and $2,640,152 for Messrs. Aldag, McLean, and Hamner, respectively. Assumptions used in the calculation of these amounts are included in Note 7 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in our 2015 Annual Report on Form 10-K.
(11) Reflects the annual cash bonus earned by our named executive officers for the applicable year, which are earned if specified corporate goals are reached.
33 Medical Properties Trust


LOGO

Executive Compensation
MPT
Grants of Plan-Based Awards
The following table provides information about plan-based awards granted to our NEOs during 2015. For further detail regarding each of these awards, see “Compensation Discussion and Analysis — Elements of Pay.”
Estimated Future Payouts Under Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards(1) Estimated Future Payouts
Threshold Target Maximum Under Equity Incentive Plan Awards(2) Threshold Target Maximum All Other Stock Awards: Number of Shares of Stock or Grant Date Fair Value of Stock and Option
Name Grant Date ($) ($) ($) (#) (#) (#) Units (#)(3) Awards
Edward K. Aldag, Jr. 1/2/2015 $950,000 $1,425,000 $1,900,000 — — — — —
1/2/2015 — — — 33,069(4) 66,137(4) 99,206(4) 99,207 —
1/2/2015 — — — 25,253(5) 50,505(5) 126,263(5) — —
1/2/2015 — — — 31,566(6) 63,131(6) 126,262(6) — $3,609,491
Emmett E. McLean 1/2/2015 $262,500 $525,000 $787,500 — — — — —
1/2/2015 — — — 10,582(4) 21,164(4) 31,746(4) 31,746 —
1/2/2015 — — — 10,823(5) 21,645(5) 54,113(5) — —
1/2/2015 — — — 13,528(6) 27,056(6) 54,112(6) — $1,312,544
R. Steven Hamner 1/2/2015 $287,500 $575,000 $862,500 — — — — —
1/2/2015 — — — 15,031(4) 30,063(4) 45,094(4) 45,094 —
1/2/2015 — — — 14,430(5) 28,860(5) 72,150(5) — —
1/2/2015 — — — 18,038(6) 36,075(6) 72,150(6) — $1,810,249
(1) Represents cash compensation which may be earned if specified corporate goals are reached.
(2) Represents awards of performance-based restricted stock. Dividends are not paid on performance-based awards until the award is earned.
(3) Represents awards of time-based restricted stock that will vest quarterly over a period of three years. The grant date fair value of the time-based restricted stock was calculated using a value of $13.94 per share, which was the average price of our common stock on January 2, 2015, the date on which these grants were made. Dividends are paid on the time-based stock awards starting on the date of grant.
(4) Represents 2015 Annual Performance - Based Restricted Stock Awards which will be earned if the Company achieves a simple 9.0% annual TSR over a three-year period, with carry back and carry forward provisions through December 31, 2017. The grant date fair value of the performance-based awardsmedian employee is based upon $7.82 per share usingon 2022 base salaries (annualized for employees hired mid-year or who had a leave of absence during the Monte Carlo valuation method, as more fully described in Note 7 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included inyear) plus incentive bonus for all individuals, excluding our 2015 Annual Report on Form 10-K.
(5) Represents 2015 Absolute TSR Awards which will be earned if the Company achieves specific cumulative TSR from January 1, 2015, to December 31, 2017. The grant date fair value of the performance-based awards is based upon $4.37 per share using the Monte Carlo valuation method, as more fully described in Note 7 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in our 2015 Annual Report on Form 10-K.
(6) Represents 2015 Relative TSR Awards which will be earned if the Company outperforms the MSCI U.S. REIT Index over the cumulative period from January 1, 2015 to December 31, 2017. The grant date fair value of the performance-based awards is based upon $7.12 per share using the Monte Carlo valuation method, as more fully described in Note 7 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in our 2015 Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Proxy Statement and Notice of 2016 Annual Meeting 34


LOGO

Executive Compensation
Outstanding Equity AwardsCEO, who were employed by us as of December 31, 2015
2022. In accordance with Item 402(u) and instructions thereto, we included all full-time, part-time, temporary and seasonal employees.

After applying the methodology described above, our median employee’s total compensation using the Summary Compensation Table requirements was $197,738. Our CEO’s total compensation as reported in the Summary Compensation Table was $16,025,513.Therefore, our CEO to median employee pay ratio is approximately 81:1.

The table below shows the outstanding equity awards held by our NEOs as of December 31, 2015. Market values arepay ratio reported above is a reasonable estimate calculated in a manner consistent with SEC rules, based on a price of $11.51 per share, the closing price of our common stock on December 31, 2015.
Option Awards
Stock Awards
Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options (#)
Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options (#)
Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Unearned Options
Option Exercise Price
Option Expiration
Number of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested
Market Value of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested
Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not
Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Market or Payout Value of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not
Name Exercisable Unexercisable (#) ($) Date (#) ($) Vested (#)(4) Vested ($)
Edward K. Aldag, Jr. — — — — — 398,992(1) 4,592,398 719,202 8,278,015
Emmett E. McLean — — — — — 163,902(2) 1,886,512 292,524 3,366,951
R. Steven Hamner — — — — — 205,276(3) 2,362,727 378,356 4,354,878
(1) 9,580 shares vested on January 1, 2016. 49,481 shares vest in quarterly installments from January 1, 2016 through January 1, 2017. 74,406 shares vest in quarterly installments from January 1, 2016 through January 1, 2018. 82,191 shares were earned based on meeting certain performance metrics and vested on January 1, 2016. 183,334 shares were earned based on meeting certain performance metrics and vest annually from January 1, 2016 to January 1, 2017.
(2) 3,016 shares vested on January 1, 2016. 15,936 shares vest in quarterly installments from January 1, 2016 through January 1, 2017. 23,808 shares vest in quarterly installments from January 1, 2016 through January 1, 2018. 37,808 shares were earned based on meeting certain performance metrics and vested on January 1, 2016. 83,334 shares were earned based on meeting certain performance metrics and vest annually from January 1, 2016 to January 1, 2017.
(3) 4,428 shares vested on January 1, 2016. 22,645 shares vest in quarterly installments from January 1, 2016 through January 1, 2017. 33,820��shares vest in quarterly installments from January 1, 2016 through January 1, 2018. 44,383 shares were earned based on meeting certain performance metrics and vested on January 1, 2016. 100,000 shares were earned based on meeting certain performance metrics and vest annually from January 1, 2016 to January 1, 2017.
(4) Represents various performance-based awards including the following:
• 2013 Annual Performance-Based Restricted Awards — 38,298; 12,056; and 17,730 shares remain unearned for Messrs. Aldag, McLean and Hamner, respectively.
• 2014 Annual Performance-Based Restricted Awards — 79,173; 25,497; and 36,232 shares remain unearned for Messrs. Aldag, McLean and Hamner, respectively.
• 2014 Absolute TSR Awards — 125,000; 57,500; and 67,500 shares remain unearned for Messrs. Aldag, McLean and Hamner, respectively.
• 2014 Relative TSR Awards — 125,000; 57,500; and 67,500 shares remain unearned for Messrs Aldag, McLean and Hamner, respectively.
• 2015 Annual Performance-Based Restricted Awards — 99,206; 31,746; and 45,094 shares remain unearned for Messrs. Aldag, McLean and Hamner, respectively.
• 2015 Absolute TSR Awards — 126,263; 54,113; and 72,150 shares remain unearned for Messrs. Aldag, McLean and Hamner, respectively.
• 2015 Relative TSR Awards — 126,262; 54,112; and 72,150 shares remain unearned for Messrs Aldag, McLean and Hamner, respectively.
The earn-out and vesting provisions, as applicable, of the 2015 Long-Term Incentive Awards, the 2015 Absolute TSR Awards,internal records and the 2015 Relative TSR Awards are fullymethodology described above. The SEC rules for identifying the median employee allow companies to adopt a variety of methodologies, to apply certain exclusions and to make reasonable estimates and assumptions that reflect their employee populations and compensation practices. Accordingly, the pay ratio reported by other companies may not be comparable to the pay ratio reported above, as other companies have different employee populations and compensation practices and may use different methodologies, exclusions, estimates and assumptions in “Compensation Discussion and Analysis — Elements of Pay.”
35 Medical Properties Trust

calculating their own pay ratios.


LOGO

Executive Compensation
MPT
Option Exercises and Stock Vested
The following table sets forth the aggregate number and value of shares of restricted common stock held by our NEOs that vested in 2015. The “Value Realized Upon Vesting” set forth below is the product of the fair market value of a share of common stock on the vesting date multiplied by the number of shares vesting. We have never issued stock options to our NEOs.
Option Awards
Stock Awards
Name
Number of Shares Acquired on Exercise (#)
Value Realized on Exercise ($)
Number of Shares Acquired on Vesting (#)
Value Realized on Vesting ($)
Edward K. Aldag, Jr. — — 287,370 3,943,294
Emmett E. McLean — — 115,680 1,594,041
R. Steven Hamner — — 146,484 2,014,142
Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control
The following table shows potential payments and benefits that will be provided to our NEOs upon the occurrence of certain termination triggering events. The change-in-control provisions in the employment agreements are designed to align management’s interests with those of our shareholders. See the discussion above under “Compensation of Executive Officers — Employment Agreements with Named Executive Officers” for information about payments upon termination or a change in control. All equity interests included in the termination and change in control calculations represent previously granted restricted stock awards and are valued based on the closing price of our common stock on December 31, 2015, and an assumed termination of employment on that date.
Name
Termination and Change in Control (1)
Death
Termination Not for Cause; By Executive for Good Reason; Permanent Disability
Termination for Cause; By Executive without Good Reason
Edward K. Aldag, Jr. $24,563,836 $12,930,413 $24,563,836 —
Emmett E. McLean 9,388,479 5,289,463 9,388,479 —
R. Steven Hamner 11,094,354 6,753,604 11,094,354 —
(1) Amounts exclude any gross up for potential Excise Tax that may be due pursuant to Code Section 4999G.
Proxy Statement and Notice of 2016 Annual Meeting36


LOGO

Executive Compensation
Compensation of Directors
The Compensation Committee has engaged FTI Consulting each year since 2007 to assist it in conducting a competitive review of our non-employee director compensation program. In late 2011, FTI Consulting conducted a survey of director compensation trends within the REIT industry, which survey included 108 publicly traded REIT filings. More specifically, FTI Consulting reviewed how the use of each component of total compensation (e.g., cash retainers and equity awards) compared to market practice, and how the total compensation for Board of Director and committee members compared to market practice. FTI Consulting’s report presented data comparing our director compensation to market levels, and the Compensation Committee took into consideration all of FTI Consulting’s findings and recommendations in determining the compensation structure for our non-employee directors for 2015.
As compensation for serving on our Board of Directors during 2015, each non-employee director received a cash retainer of $95,000. In addition, the Lead Independent Director received $30,000; the Audit Committee chairman received $25,000; the Compensation Committee chairman received $20,000; and the Ethics, Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee chairman received $20,000. Each non-employee director has annually been awarded restricted stock including 7,234 shares, 7,246 shares, and 6,855 shares in 2013, 2014 and 2015, respectively. These awards vest over three years in equal quarterly amounts. We also reimburse our directors for reasonable expenses incurred in attending Board of Director and committee meetings. Our Compensation Committee may change the compensation of our non-employee directors at its discretion. Directors who are also officers or employees receive no additional compensation for their service as directors.
The following table summarizes the compensation paid to our non-employee directors for their services during 2015. The grant date fair value of the restricted stock awards is based on $13.94 per share, the average price of our common stock on January 2, 2015, the date on which these grants were made.
Name
G. Steven Dawson
Robert E. Holmes
Sherry A. Kellett
William G. McKenzie
L. Glenn Orr, Jr. (2)
D. Paul Sparks, Jr.
Fees earned or paid in cash
$120,000
145,000
95,000
95,000
115,000
95,000
Stock Awards(1)
$95,559
95,559
95,559
95,559
95,559
95,559
Option Awards






Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation






Change in Pension Value and Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Earnings






Change in Pension Value and Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Earnings






All Other Compensation






Total
240,559
190,559
190,559
(1) Based on fair value at January 2, 2015 grant date of: $13.94
(2) Mr. Orr retired from the Board on April 3, 2016.
37 Medical Properties Trust


LOGO

Executive Compensation
The following table shows outstanding equity awards for each of our non-employee directors at December 31, 2015.
Unvested Stock
G. Steven Dawson 8,761
Robert E. Holmes 8,761
Sherry A. Kellett 8,761
William G. McKenzie 8,761
L. Glenn Orr, Jr. (1) 8,761
D. Paul Sparks, Jr. 5,142
Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

During 2015,2022, the following directors served on the Compensation Committee consisted of Dr. Holmes, Ms. KellettCommittee: C. Reynolds Thompson, III (Chair), Michael G. Stewart and Mr. Orr (chair)(1).D. Paul Sparks, Jr. No member of the Compensation Committee during 2015, or any prior year, was an officer or employee of our Company or had any relationships requiring disclosure by us under applicable SEC regulations.regulations during 2022. Mr. Stewart served as our Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary from 2005 to 2010. In addition, no executive officer served during 20152022 as a director or a member of the Compensation Committee of any entity that had an executive officer serving as a director or a member of the Compensation Committee of our Board.

Equity Compensation Plan Information

The following table provides information as of December 31, 2022, regarding shares of common stock that may be issued under our equity compensation plans, consisting of the Amended and Restated 2019 Equity Incentive Plan (the “2019 Plan”).

Plan Category

 

 Number of
securities to be
issued upon
exercise of
outstanding
options,
warrants and
rights
(a)
 Weighted
average exercise
price of
outstanding
options, warrants
and rights
(b)
 Number of
securities
remaining available
for future
issuance under
equity
compensation
plan (excluding
securities
referenced
in column
(a)(c)

Equity compensation plan approved by security holders

 –   –   19,346,557

Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders

 –   –   –  

Total

 –   –   19,346,557

We have only issued restricted stock and not issued any options, warrants or rights under the 2019 Plan.

Proxy Statement and Notice of 2023 Annual Meeting    43 


Other Information
Pay Vers
u
s Perfor
ma
nce
Pay Versus Performance Table
As required by Section 953(a) of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act and Item 402(v) of Regulation
S-K,
we are providing information about the relationship between “compensation actually paid” to our principal executive officer (“PEO”) and the other NEOs, calculated in accordance with Item 402(v) of Regulation
S-K,
and certain financial performance measures. For additional information on our compensation programs and philosophy and how we design our compensation programs to align pay with performance, see the section titled “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” beginning on page 19.
              
Value of Initial Fixed $100
Investment Based On:
       
         
Year
 
Summary
Compensation
Table Total for
PEO ($)
(1)
  
Compensation
Actually Paid to
PEO
(1)(2)
  
Average
Summary
Compensation
Table Total for
non-PEO

Named
Executive
Officers ($)
(1)
  
Average
Compensation
Actually Paid to
non-PEO

Named
Executive
Officers
(1)(2)
($)
  
Company
TSR
(3) 
($)
  
Dow Jones
Health Care
REIT TSR
(4)

($)
  
Net
Income
(5)

($mm)
  
Normalized
FFO per
Share
(6)
 ($)
 
         
  2022
  16,025,513   (8,729,616  6,192,126   (4,100,450  63.54   81.93   902.6   1.82 
         
  2021
  17,036,629   33,684,966   7,148,640   13,836,026   124.60   104.84   656.0   1.75 
         
  2020
  16,857,637   28,218,059   7,468,721   12,540,993   109.05   90.20   431.5   1.57 
(1)For fiscal years 2020, 2021 and 2022, our PEO was Edward K. Aldag, Jr. Chairman, CEO and President, and our other NEOs were R. Steven Hamner, EVP and CFO and Emmett E. McLean, EVP, COO and Secretary
(2)
The amounts reported represent the “compensation actually paid”, computed in accordance with Item 402(v) of Regulation
S-K,
but do not reflect the actual amount of compensation earned by or paid in the applicable year. In accordance with Item 402(v) of Regulation
S-K,
the following adjustments were made to the amount reported in the “Total” column of the Summary Compensation Table for each year to calculate compensation actually paid:
Adjustments to Determine Compensation “Actually Paid” for PEO (a)
  
2022
   
2021
   
2020
 
    
  SCT Total Compensation ($)   16,025,513    17,036,629    16,857,637 
    
  Grant Date Fair Value of Stock Awards Granted in Fiscal Year   (12,380,300   (12,928,532   (12,732,033
    
  Fair Value at Fiscal
Year-End
of Outstanding and Unvested Stock
  Awards Granted in Fiscal Year
   8,396,220    24,565,926    20,856,417 
    
  Change in Fair Value of Outstanding and Unvested Stock Awards
  Granted in Prior Fiscal Years
   (20,548,139   4,166,464    3,013,007 
    
  Fair Value at Vesting of Stock Awards Granted in Fiscal Year That
  Vested During Fiscal Year
   762,900    1,047,721    793,180 
    
  Change in Fair Value as of Vesting Date of Stock Awards Granted in
  Prior Fiscal Years For Which Applicable Vesting Conditions Were Met During Fiscal Year
   (985,810   (203,242   (570,149
    
  
Compensation Actually Paid
   
(8,729,616
)
 
   
33,684,966
    
28,218,059
 
 44    Proxy Statement and Notice of 2023 Annual Meeting

Other Information
Adjustments to Determine Compensation “Actually Paid” for
Non-PEOs
Named Executive
Officers (Average)
  
2022
   
2021
   
2020
 
    
  SCT Total Compensation ($)   6,192,126    7,148,640    7,468,721 
    
  Grant Date Fair Value of Stock Awards Granted in Fiscal Year   (4,531,857   (5,249,546   (5,552,149
    
  Fair Value at Fiscal
Year-End
of Outstanding and Unvested Stock Awards
  Granted in Fiscal Year
   3,039,094    9,729,908    9,116,553 
    
  Change in Fair Value of Outstanding and Unvested Stock Awards
  Granted in Prior Fiscal Years
   (8,678,809   1,874,864    1,423,515 
    
  Fair Value at Vesting of Stock Awards Granted in Fiscal Year That Vested
  During Fiscal Year
   276,519    422,195    342,930 
    
  Change in Fair Value as of Vesting Date of Stock Awards Granted in Prior
  Fiscal Years For Which Applicable Vesting Conditions Were Met During Fiscal Year
   (397,523   (90,035   (258,577
    
  
Compensation Actually Paid
   
(4,100,450
)
 
   
13,836,026
    
12,540,993
 
(a)
In making each of the adjustments, the “value” of a stock award is the fair value of the award on the applicable date determined in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718 using the valuation assumptions we then used to calculate the fair value of our equity awards. The valuation methodology used to calculate fair values did not materially differ from that disclosed at the time of grant. For more information on the valuation of our equity awards, please see the notes to our financial statements that appear in our Annual Report on Form
10-K
each fiscal year and the footnotes to the Summary Compensation Table that appears in our annual Proxy Statement.
(3)Company TSR is calculated by dividing the sum of the cumulative amount of dividends for the measurement period, assuming dividend reinvestment, and the difference between the price of our common stock at the end and the beginning of the measurement period.
(4)Represents the weighted peer group TSR, weighted according to the respective companies’ stock market capitalization at the beginning of each period for which a return is indicated. The peer group used for this purpose is the Dow Jones Health Care REIT Index, a published industry index.
(5)The dollar amounts reported represent the amount of net income reflected in the Company’s audited financial statements for the applicable year.
(6)
Refer to Appendix A for our definition of FFO and Normalized FFO and a reconciliation of net income to FFO and Normalized FFO. While the Company uses numerous financial and
non-financial
performance measures for the purpose of evaluating performance for the Company’s compensation programs, the Company has determined that Normalized FFO is the financial performance measure that, in the Company’s assessment, represents the most important financial performance measure that is not otherwise required to be disclosed in the Pay Versus Performance table used by the Company to link compensation actually paid to the Company’s NEOs, computed in accordance with Item 402(v) of Regulation
S-K,
for the most recently completed fiscal year, to Company performance. The Company utilizes Normalized FFO as a performance metric in the Company’s performance-vesting restricted shares that are awarded to the NEOs.
Tabular List of Important Financial Measures
The following are the measures that we have determined represent the most important performance measures used to link compensation actually paid to Company performance for 2022:
Most Important Measures for 2022
  Normalized FFO per Share
  EBITDA/Interest Expense Ratio
  EBITDA
  Acquisitions
  1YR and 3 YR TSR (Absolute and Relative)
Relationship between Compensation Actually Paid and Financial Measures
As described in more detail in the section “Compensation Discussion and Analysis”, our executive compensation program reflects a variable
pay-for-performance
philosophy. Our compensation program is designed to support our strategic business plan and motivate management to drive long-term value creation for our stockholders. The majority of our NEOs’ compensation is comprised of equity awards for which the value is directly tied to changes in stock price. Furthermore 66% of our equity awards are earned based on the achievement of rigorous performance hurdles. As illustrated in the table and charts below, compensation actually paid to our NEOs generally aligns with our stock price performance and financial results as follows:
In 2022, we continued to execute on our strategy including strong financial results and accretive acquisitions, but given the more challenging operating environment, our TSR declined year-over-year
Our 2022 compensation actually paid to our CEO reflects a $25 million decline from Summary Compensation Table amounts, driven by the decline in fair value of outstanding equity awards
Proxy Statement and Notice of 2023 Annual Meeting    45 

Other Information
The following graphs further illustrate the alignment of our NEOs’ compensation actually paid relative to (i) our absolute TSR and the TSR of the Dow Jones Health Care REIT Index, (ii) net income and (iii) Normalized FFO per share:
LOGO
LOGO
LOGO
 46    Proxy Statement and Notice of 2023 Annual Meeting


Other Information

Compensation of Directors

In 2022, the Compensation Committee engaged Gressle & McGinley to assist it in conducting a competitive review of our non-employee director compensation program. The Compensation Committee took into consideration Gressle & McGinley’s findings and recommendations in determining the compensation structure for our non-employee directors for 2022.

As compensation for serving on our Board during 2022, each non-employee director received a cash retainer of Directors.
(1) Mr. Orr retired from$115,000. In addition, the Lead Independent Director received a cash retainer of $50,000; the Audit Committee chair received a cash retainer of $35,000; the Compensation Committee chair received a cash retainer of $30,000; the Ethics, Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee chair received a cash retainer of $30,000; the Environmental and Social Committee chair received a cash retainer of $30,000; and the Risk Committee chair received a cash retainer of $30,000. Each non-employee director was awarded restricted stock awards of 5,241 shares, 5,928 shares and 5,552 shares in 2020, 2021 and 2022, respectively, with the exception of Ms. Murphy, who was awarded a restricted stock award of 6,101 shares in 2022. These awards vest over three years in equal quarterly amounts. We also reimburse our directors for reasonable expenses incurred in attending Board and committee meetings. Our Compensation Committee may change the compensation of our non-employee directors at its discretion. Directors who are also officers or employees receive no additional compensation for their service as directors.

In addition, pursuant to the Director Retirement Policy adopted by the Compensation Committee in February 2017, each non-employee director receives a single lump sum payment upon retirement equal to the director’s final annual retainer divided by 12 and multiplied by the director’s years of service on April 3, 2016.
Proxy Statement and Noticethe Board.

The following Director Compensation Table summarizes the compensation paid to our non-employee directors for their services during 2022:

Name

  

Fees
Earned or
Paid in Cash

($)

  Stock
Awards
(1)
($)
  All Other
Compensation
($)
  Total
($)

G. Steven Dawson

  150,000  125,475  –    275,475

Caterina A. Mozingo

  145,000  125,475  –    270,475

Emily W. Murphy(2)

  86,250  121,288  –    207,538

Elizabeth N. Pitman

  160,000  125,475  –    285,475

D. Paul Sparks, Jr.

  130,000  125,475  –    255,475

Michael G. Stewart

  165,000  125,475  –    290,475

C. Reynolds Thompson, III

  145,000  125,475  –    270,475

(1)

Based on the grant date fair value of our common stock on February 3, 2022 of $22.60. Ms. Murphy’s restricted stock award was based on the grant date fair value of our common stock on February 24, 2022 of $19.88.

(2)

Emily Murphy joined our Board on February 17, 2022.

The following table shows outstanding equity awards held by each of 2016 Annual Meeting38

our non-employee directors on December 31, 2022:


Name

Unvested Stock
(#)

G. Steven Dawson

7,067

Caterina A. Mozingo

7,067

Emily W. Murphy

4,574

Elizabeth N. Pitman

7,067

D. Paul Sparks, Jr.

7,067

Michael G. Stewart

7,067

C. Reynolds Thompson, III

7,067

LOGO

Executive Compensation

Proxy Statement and Notice of 2023 Annual Meeting    47 


Other Information

Share Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners

The following table provides information about the beneficial ownership of our common stock as of March 21, 2016, unless otherwise indicated,29, 2023, by (i) each director of the Company, (ii) each named executive officer,NEO of the Company who is not a director, (iii) all directors and executive officers as a group, and (iv) each person known to the Company to be the beneficial owner of more than 5% of the outstanding shares of common stock.
Name

The SEC defines “beneficial ownership” of Beneficial Owner*
Numbera security to mean the possession, directly or indirectly, of Shares Beneficially Owned
Percentage of Shares Outstanding(1)
Edward K. Aldag, Jr. 1,503,738(2) **
Emmett E. McLean 623,870(3) **
R. Steven Hamner 910,202(4) **
William G. McKenzie 135,871(5) **
G. Steven Dawson 70,141(6) **
Robert E. Holmes, Ph.D. 105,129(7) **
Sherry A. Kellett 74,029(7) **
D. Paul Sparks, Jr. 7,855(8) **
All directors and executive officers as a group (8 persons) 3,430,835(9) 1.44%
Other Shareholders:
The Vanguard Group, Inc. 34,948,354(10) 14.68%
100 Vanguard Blvd.
Malvern, PA 19355
BlackRock Inc. 26,882,420(11) 11.29%
55 East 52nd Street
New York, NY 10055
Vanguard Specialized Funds 16,849,034(12) 7.08%
100 Vanguard Blvd.
Malvern, PA 19355
* Unless otherwise indicated, the addressvoting power and/or investment power over such security. A stockholder is c/o Medical Properties Trust, Inc., 1000 Urban Center Drive, Suite 501, Birmingham, Alabama 35242.
** Less than 1% of the outstanding shares of common stock.
(1) Based on 238,031,836 shares of common stock outstandingalso deemed to be, as of March 21, 2016.
Includes 292,142 vested operating partnership units (convertible into an equalany date, the beneficial owner of all securities that such stockholder has the right to acquire within 60 days after that date through (i) the exercise of any option, warrant or right, (ii) the conversion of a security, (iii) the power to revoke a trust, discretionary account or similar arrangement, or (iv) the automatic termination of a trust, discretionary account or similar arrangement. In computing the number of shares of common stock). Shares of common stock that are deemed to be beneficially owned by a shareholderperson and the percentage ownership of that person, shares of common stock subject to options or other rights (as set forth above) held by that person that are exercisable as of March 29, 2023 or will become exercisable within 60 days after March 21, 2016thereafter, are deemed outstanding; however, such shares are not deemed outstanding for purposes of computing such shareholder’sthe percentage ownership but are not deemed outstanding for the purpose of computing the percentage outstanding of any other shareholder. Exceptperson. Each person named in the table has sole voting and/or investment power with respect to all of the shares of common stock shown as beneficially owned by such person, except as otherwise indicatedset forth in the notes to this table, beneficial ownership includes sole voting and investment power.
(2) Includes 197,391 shares of unvested restricted common stock, which the named officer has no right to sell or pledge.
(3) Includes 75,579 shares of unvested restricted common stock, which the named officer has no right to sell or pledge.
(4) Includes 124,581 shares of unvested restricted common stock, which the named officer has no right to sell or pledge.
(5) Includes 6,985 shares of unvested restricted common stock, which the named director has no right to sell or pledge. Shares totaling 68,886 are held in an account with margin privileges.
(6) Includes 6,985 shares of unvested restricted common stock, which the named director has no right to sell or pledge. Also includes 63,156 shares owned by Corriente Private Trust, an irrevocable Nevada Spendthrift Trust for which Mr. Dawson is the sole trustee and beneficiary.
(7) Includes 6,985 shares of unvested restricted common stock, which the named director has no right to sell or pledge.
(8) Includes 4,571 shares of unvested restricted common stock, which the named director has no right to sell or pledge.
(9) See notes (1)-(8) above.
(10) Share and beneficial ownership information was obtained from a Schedule 13G/A filed February 10, 2016 with the SEC. The Schedule 13G/A indicates that the reporting entity holds sole voting power with respect to 652,109 shares, sole dispositive power with respect to 34,455,585 shares, shared voting power with respect to 190,700 shares and shared dispositive power with respect to 492,769 shares. The Schedule 13G/A also indicates that Vanguard Fiduciary Trust Company and Vanguard Investments Australia Ltd, wholly-owned subsidiaries of The Vanguard Group, Inc., is the beneficial owner and directs the voting of 283,969 and 576,940 shares, respectively.
(11) Share and beneficial ownership information was obtained from a Schedule 13G/A filed January 8, 2016 with the SEC. According to the Schedule 13G/A, BlackRock has sole voting power over 26,298,670 shares and sole dispositive power over 26,882,420 shares.
The Schedule 13G/A states that various persons have the right to receive or the power to direct the receipt of dividends from or the proceeds from the sale of the Company’s common stock but that no one person’s interest in the Company’s common stock is more than five percent of the total outstanding common shares.
(12) Share and beneficial ownership information was obtained from a Schedule 13G/A filed February 9, 2016 with the SEC. According to the Schedule 13G, Vanguard Specialized Funds has sole voting power over 16,849,034 shares but not dispositive power over the shares.
39 Medical Properties Trust

table.


Name of Beneficial Owner*

Number of Shares
Beneficially Owned
Percentage of Shares
Outstanding
(1)

Edward K. Aldag, Jr.

3,116,010**(2)

R. Steven Hamner

1,795,283**(3)

Emmett E. McLean

1,896,228**(4)

G. Steven Dawson

123,336**(5)

Caterina A. Mozingo

26,396**(6)

Emily W. Murphy

15,776**(7)

Elizabeth N. Pitman

46,984**(8)

D. Paul Sparks, Jr.

66,474**(6)

Michael G. Stewart

224,111**(6)

C. Reynolds Thompson, III

45,253**(6)

All directors and executive officers as a group (10 persons)

7,355,8511.22%(9)

Other Stockholders:

The Vanguard Group, Inc.

100 Vanguard Blvd.

Malvern, Pennsylvania 19355

88,056,19814.60%(10)

BlackRock Inc.

55 East 52nd Street

New York, New York 10055

73,409,02112.17%(11)

State Street Corp.

1 Lincoln Street

Boston, Massachusetts 02111

36,409,7326.04%(12)

LOGO

*

Unless otherwise indicated, the address of each named person is c/o Medical Properties Trust, Inc., 1000 Urban Center Drive, Suite 501, Birmingham, Alabama 35242

**

Less than 1% of outstanding shares of common stock.

Executive Compensation MPT

 48    Proxy Statement and Notice of 2023 Annual Meeting


Other Information

(1)

Based on 602,951,259 common stock outstanding as of March 29, 2022. Shares of common stock that are deemed to be beneficially owned by a stockholder within 60 days after March 29, 2022 are deemed outstanding for purposes of computing such stockholder’s percentage ownership but are not deemed outstanding for the purpose of computing the percentage outstanding of any other stockholder. Except as otherwise indicated in the notes to this table, beneficial ownership includes sole voting and investment power.

(2)

Includes 513,956 shares of unvested restricted common stock, which the named officer has no right to sell or pledge.

(3)

Includes 256,979 shares of unvested restricted common stock, which the named officer has no right to sell or pledge.

(4)

Includes 110,253 shares of unvested restricted common stock, which the named officer has no right to sell or pledge.

(5)

Includes 15,351 shares of unvested restricted common stock, which the named director has no right to sell or pledge. Also, includes 84,847 shares owned by Corriente Private Trust, an irrevocable Nevada Spendthrift Trust for which Mr. Dawson is the sole trustee and beneficiary.

(6)

Includes 15,351 shares of unvested restricted common stock, which the named director has no right to sell or pledge.

(7)

Includes 13,740 shares of unvested restricted common stock, which the named officer has no right to sell or pledge.

(8)

Includes 15,351 shares of unvested restricted common stock, which the named officer has no right to sell or pledge. Includes 5,923 shares of common stock held in the director’s spouse’s name.

(9)

See notes (1) – (8) above.

(10)

Share and beneficial ownership information was obtained from a Schedule 13G/A filed February 9, 2023 with the SEC. The Schedule 13G/A indicates that the reporting entity holds sole dispositive power with respect to 86,749,227 shares, shared voting power with respect to 860,203 shares and shared dispositive power with respect to 1,306,971 shares.

(11)

Share and beneficial ownership information was obtained from a Schedule 13G/A filed January 20, 2023 with the SEC. According to the Schedule 13G/A, BlackRock has sole voting power over 0 shares and sole dipositive power over 0 shares. The Schedule 13G/A states that various persons have the right to receive or the power to direct the receipt of dividends from or the proceeds from the sale of the Company’s common stock but that no one person’s interest in the Company’s common stock is more than five percent of the total outstanding common shares.

(12)

Share and beneficial ownership information was obtained from a Schedule 13G/A filed February 3, 2023 with the SEC. The Schedule 13G/A indicates that the reporting entity holds shared voting power with respect to 26,557,878 shares and shared dispositive power with respect to 36,409,732 shares

Delinquent Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance
Reports

Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires that our executive officers, directors and executive officers and the beneficial owners ofpersons who own more than 10% of our equity securities,common stock to file reports of ownership and changes in ownership with the SEC. SEC rules require us to identify anyone who failed to file on a timely basis reports required by Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act during the most recent fiscal year or collectively, theprior fiscal years. Based on our review of Forms 3, 4 and 5, or written representations from reporting persons file with the SEC and the NYSE initial reports of, and subsequent reports of changes in, their beneficial ownership of our equity securities. Based solely on a review of the reports furnished to us,that no Form 5 was required for such persons, we believe that allour executive officers, directors and 10% stockholders complied with Section 16(a) filing requirements applicable to them with the exceptions noted below.

Ms. Murphy filed a late report on Form 3 upon her appointment to our Board in February 2022 due to a brief delay in obtaining the necessary filing codes. Messrs. Aldag, Hamner, McLean and Hanna each failed to file one Form 4 in April 2022 pertaining to shares withheld upon vesting of the reporting persons timelyrestricted stock to satisfy tax withholding obligations but subsequently reported this share reduction via a Form 5 filing in February 2023. Mr. Dawson filed all of the applicable SEC reports required for 2015,a late report on Form 4 in March 2023 pertaining to shares acquired and an assumen termination of employment on that date.
held indirectly through a 401(k) plan by his spouse in September 2022.

Executive Officers

For information regarding Messrs. Aldag and Hamner, please see “Proposal 1 — 1—Election of Directors” above.
Emmett E. McLean.
Age 60
Mr. McLean is one of our founders and has served as our Executive Vice President, Chief Operating Officer and Treasurer since September 2003.
Mr. McLean has served as our Secretary since June 2010, and served as our Assistant Secretary from April 2004 to June 2010. In August and September 2003, Mr. McLean also served as our Chief Financial Officer. Mr. McLean was one of our directors from September 2003 until April 2004. From June to September 2003, Mr. McLean served as Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer and as a director of our predecessor. From 2000

Emmett E. McLean

Age: 67

Founder, Executive Vice President, Chief Operating Officer (since September 2003) and Secretary (since 2010)

  Mr. McLean has served the Company in a number of positions, including Chief Financial Officer (August—September 2003) and Director (September 2003—April 2004). Prior to joining the Company, from 2000—2003, Mr. McLean was a private investor and, for part of that period, served as a consultant to a privately held company. From 1992 to 2000, Mr. McLean worked in the healthcare services industry with two different companies serving in senior positions, including Chief Financial Officer at one of the companies.

  Prior to 1992, Mr. McLean worked in the investment banking field with Dean Witter Reynolds (now Morgan Stanley) and Smith Barney (now Citigroup), and in the commercial banking field with Trust Company Bank (now Truist Bank).

  Mr. McLean has been active in a number of organizations: Mr. McLean is on the healthcare services industry with two different companies serving in senior positions, including chief financial officer at one of the companies. Prior to 1992, Mr. McLean worked in the investment banking field with Dean Witter Reynolds (now Morgan Stanley) and Smith Barney (now Citigroup), and in the commercial banking field with Trust Company Bank (now SunTrust Banks). Mr. McLean received an MBA from the University of Virginia and a B.A. in Economics from The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
Proxy Statement and Notice of 2016 Annual Meeting 40


LOGO

Certain Relationships and Related Person Transactions
The Board of Directors of the Alabama Symphony Orchestra, Ronald McDonald House Charities of Alabama, Smile-A-Mile, the Greater Alabama Council Boy Scouts of America, the Mike Slive Foundation, United Way of Central Alabama, the Rotary Club of Birmingham Foundation, UAB Athletics Foundation and the World Games 2022 Birmingham USA.

  Mr. McLean received an MBA from the University of Virginia and a B.A. in Economics from The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.

Proxy Statement and Notice of 2023 Annual Meeting    49 


LOGO

What is the purpose

of the meeting?            

At the meeting, our stockholders will vote on the following proposals:

1.  To elect the nine director nominees described in the enclosed Proxy Statement

2.  To ratify the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the year ending December 31, 2023

3.  To hold a non-binding, advisory vote to approve named executive officer compensation

4.  To hold a non-binding, advisory vote on the frequency of future advisory votes on executive compensation

In addition, our management will report on our performance at the meeting and respond to appropriate questions from stockholders.

Who is entitled to
vote?

The record date for the meeting is March 29, 2023. Only stockholders of record at the close of business on March 29, 2023, are entitled to receive notice of the meeting and to vote at the meeting the shares of our common stock that they held of record on that date. Each outstanding share of common stock entitles its holder to one vote on each matter voted on at the meeting. At the close of business on March 29, 2023, there were 599,516,410 shares of common stock outstanding and entitled to vote.

Am I entitled to vote if
my shares are held in
“street name”?

If you are the beneficial owner of shares held in “street name” by a brokerage firm, bank, or other nominee, your nominee is required to vote the shares in accordance with your instructions. If you do not give instructions to your nominee, your nominee will be entitled to vote your shares on routine items but will not be permitted to do so on non-routine items. Your nominee will have discretion to vote on Proposal 2 (ratification of auditors) without any instructions from you, but your nominee will not have the ability to vote your uninstructed shares on Proposal 1 (election of directors), Proposal 3 (non-binding, advisory vote to approve named executive officer compensation) or Proposal 4 (non-binding, advisory vote on the frequency of future advisory votes on executive compensation). Accordingly, if you hold your shares in “street name” and you do not instruct your nominee how to vote on these proposals, your nominee cannot vote these shares and will report them as “broker non-votes,” and no votes will be cast on your behalf.

How many shares
must be present to
conduct business at
the meeting?

A quorum must be present at the meeting in order for any business to be conducted. The presence at the meeting, in person or by proxy, of the holders of a majority of the shares of common stock outstanding on the record date, or 299,758,206 shares, will constitute a quorum. Abstentions and broker non-votes will be included in the number of shares considered present at the meeting for the purpose of determining whether there is a quorum.

What happens if a
quorum is not present
at the meeting?

If a quorum is not present at the scheduled time of the meeting, the holders of a majority of the shares present in person or represented by proxy at the meeting may adjourn the meeting to another place, date, or time until a quorum is present. The place, date, and time of the adjourned meeting will be announced when the adjournment is taken, and no other notice will be given unless the adjournment is to a date more than 120 days after the original record date or if, after the adjournment, a new record date is fixed for the adjourned meeting.

 50    Proxy Statement and Notice of 2023 Annual Meeting


Information About the Meeting

How do I vote my
shares?

Voting by telephone or Internet. If you are a registered holder, meaning you hold your shares in your name, you may follow the instructions on the enclosed voting instructions: By telephone 1-800-776-9437 or by internet www.voteproxy.com.

If you are a beneficial owner of shares held in “street name,” meaning your shares are held in the name of a brokerage firm, bank, or other nominee, you may be eligible to provide voting instructions to your nominee by telephone or on the Internet. A large number of brokerage firms, banks, and other nominees participate in a program provided through Broadridge Financial Solutions that offers telephone and Internet voting options. If your shares are held in “street name” by a brokerage firm, bank, or other nominee that participates in the Broadridge program, you may provide voting instructions to your nominee by telephone or on the Internet by following the instructions set forth on the voting instruction form provided to you.

Voting by mail. If you are a registered stockholder, you may vote by properly completing, signing, dating, and returning the accompanying proxy card. The enclosed postage-paid envelope requires no additional postage if it is mailed in the United States or Canada. If you are a beneficial owner of shares held in “street name,” you may provide voting instructions to the brokerage firm, bank, or other nominee that holds your shares by properly completing, signing, dating, and returning the voting instruction form provided to you by your nominee.

Voting in person at the meeting. If you are a registered stockholder and attend the meeting, you may deliver your completed proxy card in person. In addition, we will make written ballots available to registered stockholders who wish to vote in person at the meeting. If you are a beneficial owner of shares held in “street name” and wish to vote at the meeting, you will need to obtain a proxy form from the brokerage firm, bank, or other nominee that holds your shares that authorizes you to vote those shares.

Can I change my
vote after I submit
my proxy?

Yes, you may revoke your proxy and change your vote at any time before the polls are closed at the meeting in any of the following ways: (1) by properly completing, signing, dating, and returning another proxy card with a later date; (2) if you are a registered stockholder, by voting in person at the meeting; (3) if you are a registered stockholder, by giving written notice of such revocation to our Secretary prior to or at the meeting; or (4) if you are a beneficial owner of shares held in “street name,” by following the instructions given by the brokerage firm, bank or other nominee that holds your shares. Your attendance at the meeting will not by itself revoke your proxy.

What happens if I do
not specify on my
proxy how my shares
are to be voted?

If you are a registered stockholder and submit a properly executed proxy but do not indicate any voting instructions, the proxy holders will vote as the Board recommends on each proposal.

Will any other
business be
conducted at the
meeting?

As of the date hereof, the Board knows of no business that will be presented at the meeting other than the proposals described in this Proxy Statement. However, if any other proposal properly comes before the stockholders for a vote at the meeting, the proxy holders will vote the shares represented by your proxy in accordance with their best judgment.

How many votes are
required for action
to be taken on
each proposal?

The nine director nominees will be elected to serve on the Board if they each receive a majority of the votes cast in person or represented by proxy at the meeting. This means that a director nominee will be elected only if the votes cast “for” his or her election exceed the votes cast “against” his or her election. The Board has adopted a director resignation policy whereby any director who fails to receive the required majority vote in an uncontested election is required to

Proxy Statement and Notice of 2023 Annual Meeting    51 


Information About the Meeting

promptly tender his or her resignation to the Board for its consideration. The Ethics, Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will then recommend to the full Board, and the Board will decide, whether to accept or reject the resignation offer or take other action. The Board will act on the recommendation of the Ethics, Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee within 90 days following certification of the election results. If you vote to “abstain” with respect to the election of one or more director nominees, your shares will not be voted with respect to the person or persons indicated, although they will be counted for the purpose of determining whether there is a quorum at the meeting.

The affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the shares of common stock represented in person or by proxy at the annual meeting and entitled to vote on the proposal is required for approval of each of Proposals 2, 3 and 4. In respect of Proposal 4, in the event that no option receives the approval of the holders of a majority of the shares of common stock represented in person or by proxy at the annual meeting and entitled to vote on the proposal, we will consider the option that receives the most votes to be the option selected by the stockholders. Furthermore, the votes for Proposals 3 and 4 are advisory and not binding on the Board or the Company in any way.

How will abstentions
and broker
non-votes
be treated?

Abstentions and broker non-votes will not be counted as votes for or against any proposal and will not be included in calculating the number of votes necessary for approval of the proposal. In all cases, abstentions and broker non-votes will be considered present for the purpose of determining the presence of a quorum.

How will proxies
be solicited?

The costs of soliciting proxies from our stockholders will be borne by the Company. We will solicit proxies on behalf of the Board by mail, telephone, facsimile, or other electronic means or in person. Certain of our directors, officers and other employees, without additional compensation, may participate in the solicitation of proxies. We will supply copies of the proxy solicitation materials to brokerage firms, banks, and other nominees for the purpose of soliciting proxies from the beneficial owners of the shares of common stock held of record by such nominees. We will request that such brokerage firms, banks, and other nominees forward the proxy solicitation materials to the beneficial owners and reimburse them for their reasonable expenses. In addition, we anticipate using MacKenzie Partners, Inc., 105 Madison Avenue, New York, NY 10016 as a solicitor at an initial anticipated cost of $12,500.

What is “householding”
and how does it affect
me?

We have adopted a procedure, approved by the SEC, called “householding.” Under this procedure, stockholders of record who have the same address might receive only one copy of this Notice of Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement and the 2022 Annual Report to Stockholders, unless we are notified that one or more of these stockholders wishes to continue receiving individual copies. To request individual copies of the annual report and proxy statement for each stockholder in your household, please contact Investor Relations, Medical Properties Trust Inc., 1000 Urban Center Drive, Suite 501, Birmingham, Alabama 35242 (telephone: 205-969-3755). We will deliver copies of the annual report and proxy statement promptly following your written or oral request. To ask that only one set of the documents be mailed to your household, please contact your broker.

How can I obtain
additional copies of
the proxy materials?

If you wish to request extra copies of our Form 10-K, Annual Report or Proxy Statement free of charge, please send your request to Medical Properties Trust, Inc., 1000 Urban Center Drive, Suite 501, Birmingham, Alabama 35242, or visit our website at www.medicalpropertiestrust.com.

 52    Proxy Statement and Notice of 2023 Annual Meeting


LOGO

The Board has adopted a written related person transaction approval and disclosure policy for the review, approval or ratification of any related person transaction. ThisThe policy which was adopted by resolution of the full Board of Directors as reflected in our corporate records, provides that all related person transactions must be reviewed and approved by a majority of the disinterested directors on our Board of Directors in advance of us or any of our subsidiaries entering into the transaction; provided that, if we or any of our subsidiaries enter into a transaction without recognizing that such transaction constitutes a related party transaction, the approval requirement will be satisfied if such transaction is ratified by a majority of the disinterested directors serving on the Board of Directors promptly after we recognize that such transaction constituted a related person transaction. Disinterested directors are directors who do not have a personal financial interest in the transaction that is adverse to our financial interest or that of our shareholders.stockholders. The term “related person transaction” refers to a transaction required to be disclosed by us pursuant to Item 404 of Regulation S-K (or any successor provision) promulgated by the SEC. For purposes of determining whether such disclosure is required, a related person will not be deemed to have a direct or indirect material interest in any transaction that is deemed not to be material (or would be deemed not material if such related person was a director) for purposes of determining director independence pursuant to standards of director independence under the NYSE’s listing standards.
On April 3, 2016, Mr. L. Glenn Orr, Jr., age 75, retired

From time to time, including in 2022, we may have employees who are related to our executive officers or directors and whose current annualized compensation (including benefits) exceeds the SEC disclosure threshold of $120,000. The Company evaluates any such employment relationships as a member of the Board. Mr. Orr had been a member of the Board and its various committees since February 2005, and the Company expresses its appreciation and thanks to Mr. Orr for his 11 years of service and for his many contributions. Mr. Orr had been serving on two standing committees of the Board, the Compensation Committee and the Investments Committee, and the Board has determined to fill Mr. Orr’s prior position on the Compensation Committee with director D. Paul Sparks, age 53, and not to replace Mr. Orr on the Investments Committee. In order to have continued access, following Mr. Orr’s retirement, to his knowledge and expertise regarding the Company and its businesses, customers and the communities it serves, the Company and Mr. Orr have entered into a consulting agreement pursuant to which Mr. Orr has agreed to provide consulting services to the Board andrelated party transactions subject to the Company’s Chief Executive Officer for at least three years following his retirement forapproval and disclosure policies described above. During 2022, Mr. Aldag had two family members employed by the Company; and Mr. Hamner had two family members employed by the Company. Such family members were employed in non-executive positions, and each received total compensation between $120,000 and $455,000. Total compensation was comparable to that of other employees in similar positions, and family member employees were eligible to participate in benefit programs only on the same basis as other eligible employees.

From time to time, we may also engage in ordinary course commercial dealings with unaffiliated companies who may employ in a non-executive capacity, or may have employed in the past, individuals related to one or more of our executive officers or directors. We enter into any such transactions on an aggregate fee of $630,000.
41 Medical Properties Trust

arms-length basis on terms that are consistent with similar transactions with other similarly situated customers and vendors. During the year ended December 31, 2022, the Company paid Johnson Healthcare Real Estate (“Johnson”), a hospital development management company, approximately $1.7 million primarily related to construction project management and facility review oversight. Mr. Aldag has a family member currently employed by Johnson in a non-executive capacity.


LOGO

Additional Information

Proxy Statement and Notice of 2023 Annual Meeting    53 


LOGO

Stockholder Proposals for Inclusion in Proxy Statement for 20172024 Annual Meeting of Stockholders

To be considered for inclusion in our proxy statement for the 20172024 annual meeting of shareholders,stockholders, a shareholderstockholder proposal submitted pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 14a-8 must be received by us no later than the close of business on December 30, 2016.29, 2023. Stockholder proposals must be sent to the Company c/o Secretary, Medical Properties Trust, Inc., 1000 Urban Center Drive, Suite 501, Birmingham, Alabama 35242. We will not be required to include in our proxy statement any shareholderstockholder proposal that does not meet all the requirements for such inclusion established by the SEC’s proxy rules and Maryland corporate law.

Other Stockholder Proposals

Our Second Amended and Restated Bylaws provide that a shareholderstockholder who desires to propose any business at an annual meeting of shareholders,stockholders, other than proposals submitted pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 14a-8, must give us written notice of such shareholder’sstockholder’s intent to bring such business before such meeting. Such notice is to be delivered to, or mailed postage prepaid, and received by our Secretary at Medical Properties Trust, Inc., 1000 Urban Center Drive, Suite 501, Birmingham, Alabama 35242 not earlier than December 30, 2016,29, 2023, nor later than January 29, 2017,28, 2024, unless our 20172024 annual meeting of shareholdersstockholders is scheduled to take place before April 19, 201725, 2024 or after July 18, 2017. Our Second Amended and Restated Bylaws state that such shareholder’s notice must be delivered to, or mailed and received at, our principal executive office not less than 90 days nor more than 120 days prior to the first anniversary of the date of the mailing of the notice for the preceding year’s annual meeting. However,24, 2024, in the event that the date of the annual meeting is more than 30 days before or more than 60 days after the anniversary date of the preceding year’s annual meeting,which case a timely notice by the shareholder to be timelystockholders must be so delivered not earlier than 120 days prior to such annual meeting date and not later than the later of 60 days prior to such annual meeting date and 10 days following the issuance of a press release announcing the meeting date. The shareholder’sstockholder’s written notice must set forth a brief description of the business desired to be brought before the meeting and certain other information as set forth in Section 1.02 of our Second Amended and Restated Bylaws. Stockholders may obtain a copy of our Second Amended and Restated Bylaws by writing to the Company c/o Secretary at the address shown above.
Proxy Statement and Notice of 2016 Annual Meeting 42


LOGO

Additonal Information
Stockholder Nominations of Directors

In order for an eligible stockholder or group of stockholders to nominate a director nominee for election at our Company’s 2024 annual meeting pursuant to the proxy access provision of our Bylaws, notice of such nomination and other required information must be received by our Secretary at Medical Properties Trust, Inc., 1000 Urban Center Drive, Suite 501, Birmingham, Alabama 35242 not earlier than December 29, 2023, nor later than January 28, 2024, unless our 2024 annual meeting of stockholders is scheduled to take place before April 25, 2024 or after July 24, 2024, in which case a timely notice by stockholders must be delivered not earlier than 120 days prior to such annual meeting date and not later than the later of 60 days prior to such annual meeting date and 10 days following the issuance of a press release announcing the meeting date. In addition, our Bylaws require the eligible stockholder or group of stockholders to update and supplement such information (or provide notice stating that there are no updates or supplements) as of specified dates.

In order to be eligible to utilize these proxy access provisions, a stockholder, or group of no more than 20 stockholders, must, among other requirements:

Have owned shares of common stock equal to at least 3% of the aggregate of the issued and outstanding shares of common stock of the Company continuously for at least the prior three (3) years; and

Represent that such shares were acquired in the ordinary course of business and not with the intent to change or influence control at the Company and that such stockholder or group does not presently have such intent.

Additionally, all director nominees submitted through these provisions must be independent and meet specified additional criteria set forth in Section 2.17 of our Bylaws. Stockholders will not be entitled to utilize this proxy access right at an annual meeting if the Company receives notice through its traditional advanced notice by-law provisions described below that a stockholder intends to nominate a director at such meeting. The maximum number of director nominees that may be submitted pursuant to these provisions may not exceed 20% of the number of directors then in office. The foregoing proxy access right is subject to additional eligibility, procedural and disclosure requirements set forth in our Bylaws.

Our Second Amended and Restated Bylaws also provide that a shareholderstockholder who desires to nominate directors at a meeting of shareholdersstockholders but not submit such nomination for inclusion in our proxy statement must give us written notice of such proposed nomination. For our 20172024 annual meeting of shareholders,stockholders, such notice is to be delivered to, or mailed postage prepaid, and received by our Secretary at Medical Properties Trust, Inc., 1000 Urban Center Drive, Suite 501, Birmingham, Alabama 35242 not earlier than December 30, 2016,29, 2023, nor

 54    Proxy Statement and Notice of 2023 Annual Meeting


Additional Information

later than January 29, 2017,28, 2024, unless our 20172024 annual meeting of shareholdersstockholders is scheduled to take place before April 19, 201725, 2024 or after July 18, 2017. As24, 2024, in which case a timely notice by stockholders must be delivered not earlier than 120 days prior to such annual meeting date and 10 days following the issuance of a press release announcing the meeting date. The stockholder’s written notice must include the information set forth in Section 2.03 of our Second AmendedBylaws.

Universal Proxy Nominations of Directors

To comply with the universal proxy rules, and Restated Bylaws, the notice mustin addition to meeting any deadlines as set forth the following information:
asin our Bylaws, stockholders who intend to each person whom the shareholder proposes to nominate for election or re-election as a director:
the name, age, business address, residence address and principal occupation or employmentsolicit proxies in support of such person;
the class or series and number of shares ofdirector nominees other than the Company’s capital stock which are beneficially ownednominees must provide notice that sets forth the information required by Rule 14a-19 under the Exchange Act no later than March 26, 2024 (or such person onearlier date as may be set forth in our Bylaws); provided, however, that in the event that the date of such shareholder’s notice andthe annual meeting is advanced or delayed by more than 30 days from the first anniversary of the date such shares were acquired and the investment intent of such acquisition;
the consent of each nominee to serve as a director of the Company if so elected;
any other information relating to such person that would have been required topreceding year’s annual meeting, notice must be included in a proxy statement filed pursuantprovided by the later of 60 days prior to the proxy rulesdate of the SEC; and
as toannual meeting or the shareholder giving notice and certain parties associated with such shareholder:
a brief description10th day following the day on which public announcement of the nominations desired to be brought before the meeting and the reasons for making such nominations at the meeting;
their names and addresses;
a representation that each is a holder of record of sharesdate of the Company entitled to vote at suchannual meeting and that the shareholder intends to appear in person or by proxy at such meeting to make such nominations;
a description of all arrangements or understandings among the shareholder and/or certain parties associated with the shareholder and each nominee and any other person (naming such person(s)) pursuant to which the nominations are to be made by the shareholder; and
to the extent known by the shareholder giving the notice, the name and address of any other shareholder supporting the nominee for election or reelection as a director, and the class or series and number of shares of the Company’s capital stock beneficially owned by such other shareholder(s).
is first made.

By Order of the Board of Directors,

LOGO

Emmett E. McLean

Executive Vice President, Chief Operating Officer
Treasurer

and Secretary

Birmingham, Alabama

April 29, 2016


LOGO


LOGO

MPT
Medical Properties Trust


LOGO

27, 2023

 

ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS OF

MEDICAL PROPERTIES TRUST, INC.

Proxy Statement and Notice of 2023 Annual Meeting    55 


May 19, 2016Appendix A: Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Financial Measures

GO GREEN e-ConsentWe consider non-GAAP financial measures to be useful supplemental measures of our operating performance. A non-GAAP financial measure is a measure of financial performance, financial position, or cash flows that excludes or includes amounts that are not so excluded or included in the most directly comparable measure calculated and presented in accordance with GAAP. Described below are the non-GAAP financial measures used by management to evaluate our operating performance and that we consider most useful to investors, together with reconciliations of these measures to the most directly comparable GAAP measures.

Funds From Operations and Normalized Funds From Operations

Investors and analysts following the real estate industry utilize funds from operations (“FFO”) as a supplemental performance measure. FFO, reflecting the assumption that real estate asset values rise or fall with market conditions, principally adjusts for the effects of GAAP depreciation and amortization of real estate assets, which assumes that the value of real estate diminishes predictably over time. We compute FFO in accordance with the definition provided by the National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts, or Nareit, which represents net income (loss) (computed in accordance with GAAP), excluding gains (losses) on sales of real estate and impairment charges on real estate assets, plus real estate depreciation and amortization and after adjustments for unconsolidated partnerships and joint ventures.

In addition to presenting FFO in accordance with the Nareit definition, we disclose Normalized FFO, which adjusts FFO for items that relate to unanticipated or non-core events or activities or accounting changes that, if not noted, would make comparison to prior period results and market expectations less meaningful to investors and analysts.

We believe that the use of FFO, combined with the required GAAP presentations, improves the understanding of our operating results among investors and the use of Normalized FFO makes it easy to go paperless. With e-Consent, you can quickly access your proxy material, statementscomparisons of our operating results with prior periods and other eligible documents online, while reducingcompanies more meaningful. While FFO and Normalized FFO are relevant and widely used supplemental measures of operating and financial performance of REITs, they should not be viewed as a substitute measure of our operating performance since the measures do not reflect either depreciation and amortization costs clutteror the level of capital expenditures and paper waste. Enroll today via www.amstock.comleasing costs (if any not paid by tenant) to enjoy online access.maintain the operating performance of our properties, which can be significant economic costs that could materially impact our results of operations. FFO and Normalized FFO should not be considered an alternative to net income (loss) (computed in accordance with GAAP) as indicators of our financial performance or to cash flow from operating activities (computed in accordance with GAAP) as an indicator of our liquidity.

Important Notice Regarding Internet Availability

Proxy Statement and Notice of 2023 Annual Meeting    A-1 


APPENDIX A

The following table presents a reconciliation of Proxy Materialsnet income attributable to MPT common stockholders to FFO and Normalized FFO for the Annual Meeting:years ended December 31, 2022, 2021, 2020 and 2019 (amounts in thousands except per share data):

   For the Years Ended December 31,
   2022 2021 2020 2019

FFO Information

     

Net income attributable to MPT common stockholders

  

$

902,597

 

 

$

656,021

 

 

$

431,450

 

 

$

374,684

 

Participating securities’ share in earnings

  

 

(1,602

 

 

(2,161

 

 

(2,105

 

 

(2,308

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income, less participating securities’ share in earnings

  

$

900,995

 

 

$

653,860

 

 

$

429,345

 

 

$

372,376

 

Depreciation and amortization

  

 

399,622

 

 

 

374,599

 

 

 

306,493

 

 

 

183,921

 

(Gain) loss on sale of real estate

  

 

(536,887

 

 

(52,471

 

 

2,833

 

 

 

(41,560

Real estate impairment charges

  

 

170,582

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

19,006

 

 

 

21,031

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Funds from operations

  

$

934,312

 

 

$

975,988

 

 

$

757,677

 

 

$

535,768

 

Write-off (recovery) of unbilled rent and other

  

 

37,682

 

 

 

7,213

 

 

 

26,415

 

 

 

(1,713

Gain on sale of equity investments

  

 

-

 

 

 

(40,945

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

Other impairment charges, net

  

 

97,793

 

 

 

39,411

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

28,089

 

Non-cash fair value adjustments

  

 

(2,333

 

 

(8,193

 

 

9,642

 

 

 

(6,908

Tax rate changes and other

  

 

10,697

 

 

 

34,796

 

 

 

9,295

 

 

 

(3,929

Debt refinancing and unutilized financing costs

  

 

9,452

 

 

 

27,650

 

 

 

28,180

 

 

 

6,106

 

Acquisition and other transaction costs, net

  

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Normalized funds from operations

  

$

1,087,603

 

 

$

1,035,920

 

 

$

831,209

 

 

$

557,413

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Per diluted share data

     

Net income, less participating securities’ share in earnings

  

$

1.50

 

 

$

1.11

 

 

$

0.81

 

 

$

0.87

 

Depreciation and amortization

  

 

0.67

 

 

 

0.63

 

 

 

0.57

 

 

 

0.43

 

(Gain) loss on sale of real estate

  

 

(0.90

 

 

(0.09

 

 

0.01

 

 

 

(0.10

Real estate impairment charges

  

 

0.29

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

0.04

 

 

 

0.05

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Funds from operations

  

$

1.56

 

 

$

1.65

 

 

$

1.43

 

 

$

1.25

 

Write-off (recovery) of unbilled rent and other

  

 

0.07

 

 

 

0.01

 

 

 

0.05

 

 

 

(0.01

Gain on sale of equity investments

  

 

-

 

 

 

(0.07

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

Other impairment charges, net

  

 

0.16

 

 

 

0.07

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

0.07

 

Non-cash fair value adjustments

  

 

-

 

 

 

(0.01

 

 

0.02

 

 

 

(0.01

Tax rate changes and other

  

 

0.02

 

 

 

0.06

 

 

 

0.02

 

 

 

(0.01

Debt refinancing and unutilized financing costs

  

 

0.01

 

 

 

0.04

 

 

 

0.05

 

 

 

0.01

 

Acquisition and other transaction costs, net

  

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

-

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Normalized funds from operations

  

$

1.82

 

 

$

1.75

 

 

$

1.57

 

 

$

1.30

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 A-2    Proxy Statement and Notice of 2023 Annual Meeting


APPENDIX A

Total Adjusted Gross Assets

Total adjusted gross assets is total assets before accumulated depreciation/amortization (adjusted for our investments in unconsolidated real estate joint ventures), assumes material transaction commitments are completed, and assumes cash on hand at period-end and cash generated from or to be generated from transaction commitments or financing activities subsequent to period-end are either used in these transactions or used to reduce debt. We believe total adjusted gross assets is useful to investors as it provides a more current view of our portfolio and allows for a better understanding of our concentration levels as our commitments close. The Notice and Proxy Statement, Annual Report and 2015 Form 10-K are available at www.medicalpropertiestrust.comfollowing table presents a reconciliation of total assets to total adjusted gross assets (in thousands):

Please sign, date and mail your proxy card

   As of December 31,
   2022

Total assets

  

$

19,658,000

 

Add:

  

Accumulated depreciation and amortization

  

 

1,193,312

 

Incremental gross assets of our Investments in Unconsolidated Real Estate Joint Ventures (1)

  

 

1,698,917

 

Net:

  

Reclassification between operators (2)

  

 

-

 

Gross book value of the transactions, net (3)

  

 

(1,074,024

Decrease in cash from the transactions (4)

  

 

(235,668

  

 

 

 

Total adjusted gross assets

  

$

21,240,537

 

  

 

 

 

(1)

Reflects an addition to total assets to present our total share of each joint venture’s gross assets. See below for details of the calculation. While we do not control any of our unconsolidated real estate joint venture arrangements and do not have direct legal claim to the underlying assets of the unconsolidated real estate joint ventures, we believe this adjustment allows investors to view certain concentration information on a basis comparable to the remainder of our real estate portfolio. This presentation is also consistent with how our management team reviews our portfolio (dollar amounts in thousands):

   As of December 31,
   2022

Real estate joint venture total gross real estate and other assets

  

$

5,921,188

 

Weighted-average equity ownership percentage

  

 

55

  

 

 

 

  

 

3,261,727

 

Investments in Unconsolidated Real Estate Joint Ventures (A)

  

 

(1,562,810

  

 

 

 

Incremental gross assets of our Investments in Unconsolidated Real Estate Joint Ventures

  

$

1,698,917

 

  

 

 

 

(A) Includes amount shown on the “Investments in unconsolidated real estate joint ventures” line on our consolidated balance sheets, along with a CHF 60 million mortgage loan included in the envelope provided“Mortgage loans” line on our consolidated balance sheet.

(2)

Reflects a reclass of $0.8 billion of gross assets between Springstone and Lifepoint along with a $0.9 billion reclass of gross assets between Steward and Common Spirit Health as part of the transactions described in Note 13 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Proxy Statement and Notice of 2023 Annual Meeting    A-3 


APPENDIX A

(3)

Represents the gross book value of assets sold or written off due to the committed transactions, partially offset by the addition of new gross assets from the committed transactions. See detail below (in thousands):

   As of December 31,
   2022

Gross book value of assets in transactions

  

$

(655,354

Non-cash write-offs related to transactions

  

 

(418,670

  

 

 

 

Gross book value of the transactions, net

  

$

(1,074,024

  

 

 

 

(4)

Represents cash expected from the proceeds generated by the transactions along with cash on hand to fund the transactions or reduce debt as detailed below (in thousands):

   As of December 31,
   2022

Expected cash proceeds generated by (used for) the transactions

  

$

659,000

 

Reduction of revolver balance

  

 

(894,668

  

 

 

 

Net decrease in cash from the transactions

  

$

(235,668

  

 

 

 

 A-4    Proxy Statement and Notice of 2023 Annual Meeting


APPENDIX A

Return on Equity

Return on equity as soonmeasured by Normalized FFO is derived from amounts included in our U.S. GAAP financial statements. We use Normalized FFO as possible.

Please detach along perforated linethe numerator for the same reasons we present Normalized FFO, as discussed on page A-1. We use average total equity excluding the effect of accumulated depreciation and mail in the envelope provided.

00033333333030000000 1 051916

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE “FOR” ALL NOMINEES AND “FOR” PROPOSALS 2 AND 3.

PLEASE SIGN, DATE AND RETURN PROMPTLY IN THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE. PLEASE MARK YOUR VOTE IN BLUE OR BLACK INK AS SHOWN HERE

To change the address on your account, please check the box at right and indicate your new address in the address space above. Please note that changesamortization similar to the registered name(s)exclusion of depreciation and amortization from Normalized FFO.

Return on equity measures the account mayactual profitability we delivered related to the actual cost of the equity with which we have built our portfolio. Return on equity measured by Normalized FFO should not be submitted via this method.considered a substitute for return on equity measured by net income and does not reflect the overall profitability of our business. The following tables reconcile return on equity measured by net income and return on equity measured by Normalized FFO (dollars in thousands):

1. To elect seven directors

     For the years ended December 31, 

Return on equity measured by net income

     2022 

Numerator:

    

Net income attributable to MPT common stockholders

    $902,597 
    

 

 

 

Denominator:

    

Beginning total equity

    $8,445,671 

Ending total equity

     8,594,407 

Average total equity

    $8,520,039 
    

 

 

 

Return on equity measured by net income

     10.59
    

 

 

 
     For the years ended December 31, 

Return on equity measured by Normalized funds from operations

     2022 

Numerator:

    

Normalized funds from operations(1)

    $1,087,603 
    

 

 

 

Denominator:

    

Beginning total equity

    $8,445,671 

Accumulated depreciation and amortization

     993,100 

Accumulated depreciation and amortization (real estate held for sale)

     113,996 
    

 

 

 

Adjusted beginning total equity

     9,552,767 

Ending total equity

     8,594,407 

Accumulated depreciation and amortization

     1,193,312 

Accumulated depreciation and amortization (real estate held for sale)

     - 
    

 

 

 

Adjusted ending total equity

     9,787,719 

Average adjusted total equity

    $9,670,243 
    

 

 

 

Return on equity measured by Normalized funds from operations

     11.25
    

 

 

 

(1)

See reconciliation on page A-2

FOR AGAINST ABSTAIN

Edward K. Aldag, Jr.

Proxy Statement and Notice of 2023 Annual Meeting    A-5 



LOGO


G. Steven DawsonLOGO

R. Steven Hamner

Robert E. Holmes, Ph.D.

Sherry A. Kellett

William G. McKenzie

D. Paul Sparks, Jr.

2. To ratify the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2016.

3. Advisory approval of the Company’s executive compensation.

With respect to any other item of business that properly comes before the annual meeting and at any adjournments or postponements thereof, the proxy holders are authorized to vote the undersigned’s shares in their discretion.

THIS PROXY IS SOLICITED ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE COMPANY AND WILL BE VOTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE UNDERSIGNED’S INSTRUCTIONS SET FORTH HEREIN. UNLESS DIRECTION IS GIVEN TO THE CONTRARY, THIS PROXY WILL BE VOTED “FOR” ALL NOMINEES AND “FOR” EACH OF PROPOSAL 2 AND 3.

Signature of Stockholder Date: Signature of Stockholder Date:

Note: Please sign exactly as your name or names appear on this Proxy. When shares are held jointly, each holder should sign. When signing as executor, administrator, attorney, trustee or guardian, please give full title as such. If the signer is a corporation, please sign full corporate name by duly authorized officer, giving full title as such. If signer is a partnership, please sign in partnership name by authorized person.


LOGO

PROXY

MEDICAL PROPERTIES TRUST, INC.

2016 To change the address on your account, please check the box at right and indicate your new address in the address space above. Please note that changes to the registered name(s) on the account may not be submitted via this method. THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE “FOR” ALL NOMINEES AND “FOR” PROPOSALS 2, 3 AND FOR “1 YEAR” ON PROPOSAL 4. PLEASE SIGN, DATE AND RETURN PROMPTLY IN THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE. PLEASE MARK YOUR VOTE IN BLUE OR BLACK INK AS SHOWN HERE x Please detach along perforated line and mail in the envelope provided. 00033333333330340000 4 052523 ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS TO BE HELD ON MAY 19, 2016

OF MEDICAL PROPERTIES TRUST, INC. May 25, 2023 Important Notice Regarding Internet Availability of Proxy Materials for the Annual Meeting: The Notice and Proxy Statement, Annual Report and 2022 Form 10-K are available at www.medicalpropertiestrust.com Please sign, date and mail your proxy card in the envelope provided as soon as possible. GO GREEN e-Consent makes it easy to go paperless. With e-Consent, you can quickly access your proxy material, statements and other eligible documents online, while reducing costs, clutter and paper waste. Enroll today via www.astfinancial.com to enjoy online access. 1. To elect eight directors. O Edward K. Aldag, Jr. O G. Steven Dawson O R. Steven Hamner O Robert E. Holmes, Ph.D. O Sherry A. Kellett O William G. McKenzie O L. Glenn Orr, Jr. O D. Paul Sparks, Jr. FOR ALL NOMINEES WITHHOLD AUTHORITY FOR ALL NOMINEES FOR ALL EXCEPT (See instructions below) INSTRUCTIONS: To withhold authority to vote for any individual nominee(s), mark “FOR ALL EXCEPT” and fill in the circle next to each nominee you wish to withhold, as shown here: NOMINEES: THIS PROXY IS SOLICITED ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE COMPANY AND WILL BE VOTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE UNDERSIGNED’S INSTRUCTIONS SET FORTH HEREIN. UNLESS DIRECTION IS GIVEN TO THE CONTRARY, THIS PROXY WILL BE VOTED “FOR” ALL NOMINEES AND “FOR” EACH OF PROPOSALS 2 AND 3 AND FOR “1 YEAR” ON PROPOSAL 4. 1. To elect nine directors Edward K. Aldag, Jr. G. Steven Dawson R. Steven Hamner Caterina A. Mozingo Emily W. Murphy Elizabeth N. Pitman D. Paul Sparks, Jr. Michael G. Stewart C. Reynolds Thompson, III 2. To ratify the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2023. 3. To approve, on a non-binding, advisory basis, the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers. 4. To recommend, on a non-binding, advisory basis, the frequency of future advisory votes on executive compensation. With respect to any other item of business that properly comes before the annual meeting and at any adjournments or postponements thereof, the proxy holders are authorized to vote the undersigned’s shares in their discretion. FOR AGAINST ABSTAIN 2 1 YEAR YEARS 3 YEARS ABSTAIN


LOGO

0 ————————— 14475 PROXY MEDICAL PROPERTIES TRUST, INC. 2023 ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS TO BE HELD ON MAY 25, 2023 THIS PROXY IS SOLICITED ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS The 20162023 Annual Meeting of Stockholders of Medical Properties Trust, Inc. (the “Annual Meeting”) will be held at The Summit Club, 1901 6th Avenue North,UAB Collat School of Business, 710 13th Street South, Birmingham, Alabama 35233, on May 19, 2016,25, 2023, beginning at 10:30 a.m. Central Time. You can access directions to the Annual Meeting at www.medicalpropertiestrust.com. The undersigned hereby acknowledges receipt of the combined Notice of 20162023 Annual Meeting of Stockholders and Proxy Statement dated April 29, 2016,27, 2023, accompanying this proxy and to which reference is hereby made, for further information regarding the Annual Meeting and the matters to be considered and voted on by the stockholders at the Annual Meeting.

The undersigned hereby appoints Edward K. Aldag, Jr. and R. Steven Hamner, and each of them, attorneys and agents, with full power of substitution, to vote, as the undersigned’s proxy, all the shares of common stock owned of record by the undersigned as of the record date and otherwise to act on behalf of the undersigned at the meeting and any adjournment thereof, in accordance with the instructions set forth herein and with discretionary authority with respect to any other business, not known or determined at the time of the solicitation of this proxy, that properly comes before such meeting or any adjournment thereof.

The undersigned hereby revokes any proxy heretofore given and directs said attorneys and agents to vote or act as indicated on the reverse side hereof.

1.1 (Continued and to be signed on the reverse side) 144751.1